<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPTV not yet a killer app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-126745</link>
		<dc:creator>Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 21:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3434#comment-126745</guid>
		<description>Germany is already ahead, tax-wise. From 2007-01-01 onwards they will charge a TV-set fee for each and every PC (even office PCs) with Internet access here, although no programs are offered.
Great scheme. As you may run truck simulations on a PC as well, why not charging truck taxes for each PC?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Germany is already ahead, tax-wise. From 2007-01-01 onwards they will charge a TV-set fee for each and every PC (even office PCs) with Internet access here, although no programs are offered.<br />
Great scheme. As you may run truck simulations on a PC as well, why not charging truck taxes for each PC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-80582</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3434#comment-80582</guid>
		<description>I agree on the gadget comment, alessandro, but believe the set-top box is more part of the solution than the problem. The idea of using an HTPC as your primary tuner for more than 5 channels, even with a CableCard, is folly.

I&#039;m a fan of devices that do their job well. A set-top box that had some sort of Slingbox type functionality along with a PVR would beat the hell out of anything one can build with Windows MCE or MythTV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on the gadget comment, alessandro, but believe the set-top box is more part of the solution than the problem. The idea of using an HTPC as your primary tuner for more than 5 channels, even with a CableCard, is folly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of devices that do their job well. A set-top box that had some sort of Slingbox type functionality along with a PVR would beat the hell out of anything one can build with Windows MCE or MythTV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-80559</link>
		<dc:creator>alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3434#comment-80559</guid>
		<description>the way i see it, too much importance is being put on set top boxes -- most living rooms are already  drowning in gadgets, do we need another one?

in my view, IPTV is best delivered to wifi&#039;d laptops. 

a screen on every bed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the way i see it, too much importance is being put on set top boxes &#8212; most living rooms are already  drowning in gadgets, do we need another one?</p>
<p>in my view, IPTV is best delivered to wifi&#8217;d laptops. </p>
<p>a screen on every bed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenFranske</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-80553</link>
		<dc:creator>BenFranske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3434#comment-80553</guid>
		<description>I saw the Microsoft demo of IPTV at CES last year. I think it looks wretched. If you have more than one TV/device on at a time it just uses way too much bandwidth for current connection speeds. There are workarounds such as PVR recording &quot;upstream&quot; at the provider to reduce bandwith but that&#039;s still a workaround. I think for this to take off we&#039;re either going to need really fat internet pipes (that aren&#039;t being locked down by ISPs) or move to a model that doesn&#039;t rely on broadcasting and appointment viewing, eg. shows download to a local box overnight and then you watch them at your convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the Microsoft demo of IPTV at CES last year. I think it looks wretched. If you have more than one TV/device on at a time it just uses way too much bandwidth for current connection speeds. There are workarounds such as PVR recording &#8220;upstream&#8221; at the provider to reduce bandwith but that&#8217;s still a workaround. I think for this to take off we&#8217;re either going to need really fat internet pipes (that aren&#8217;t being locked down by ISPs) or move to a model that doesn&#8217;t rely on broadcasting and appointment viewing, eg. shows download to a local box overnight and then you watch them at your convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/01/iptv-not-yet-a-killer-app/comment-page-1/#comment-80547</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3434#comment-80547</guid>
		<description>While I have hope for IPTV, especially in relation to the UTOPIA project here in Utah, I have yet to see a &quot;simple&quot; implementation of the technology. Will there come a day when IPTV isn&#039;t a royal pain to put in place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I have hope for IPTV, especially in relation to the UTOPIA project here in Utah, I have yet to see a &#8220;simple&#8221; implementation of the technology. Will there come a day when IPTV isn&#8217;t a royal pain to put in place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

