<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Browser Wars Are Back!  Microsoft Buys the Opera Browser?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:24:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SignOfZeta</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83890</link>
		<dc:creator>SignOfZeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 04:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83890</guid>
		<description>The fact that this story seems to be bugus is one thing, but &quot;Bring it on guys, competition is a good thing!&quot;...that&#039;s just amazingly...I don&#039;t know. Would &quot;stupid&quot; be too harsh?

My friend says logical consistency is over-rated. I&#039;m not so sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that this story seems to be bugus is one thing, but &#8220;Bring it on guys, competition is a good thing!&#8221;&#8230;that&#8217;s just amazingly&#8230;I don&#8217;t know. Would &#8220;stupid&#8221; be too harsh?</p>
<p>My friend says logical consistency is over-rated. I&#8217;m not so sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83881</guid>
		<description>Good grief amateurs, publicly-traded companies don&#039;t acquire each other without, uh, announcing the fact.  That&#039;s becuase, y&#039;know, the acquisition doesn&#039;t occur unless and until all those indiciduals who hold the shares exhange them for compensation. The process always takes a long time and must be approved by a majority of shareholders, etc etc.  

It&#039;s not like walking in to the store and buying a sixpack of beer.









</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief amateurs, publicly-traded companies don&#8217;t acquire each other without, uh, announcing the fact.  That&#8217;s becuase, y&#8217;know, the acquisition doesn&#8217;t occur unless and until all those indiciduals who hold the shares exhange them for compensation. The process always takes a long time and must be approved by a majority of shareholders, etc etc.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like walking in to the store and buying a sixpack of beer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83875</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83875</guid>
		<description>No argument from me that IE for MAC is a POS. What I&#039;m saying is that, if you&#039;re a software company and you have IE for MAC as a product you support and promote, do you try to improve or just can it?

When the market for your free product is less than 3% you dump it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument from me that IE for MAC is a POS. What I&#8217;m saying is that, if you&#8217;re a software company and you have IE for MAC as a product you support and promote, do you try to improve or just can it?</p>
<p>When the market for your free product is less than 3% you dump it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dvorak reader</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83813</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvorak reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83813</guid>
		<description>Another prediction.
Microsoft buying Technorati in 2006?
The Tag Wars.
Google tags?  2005 was the search year.  2006: Year of the Tag? 
Tag spam could be a big problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another prediction.<br />
Microsoft buying Technorati in 2006?<br />
The Tag Wars.<br />
Google tags?  2005 was the search year.  2006: Year of the Tag?<br />
Tag spam could be a big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady J. Frey</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83805</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady J. Frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83805</guid>
		<description>Um, no:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39243639,00.htm

I don&#039;t see MS bowing out -- again, activex. While their attempts at pitching Web 2.0 when they really don&#039;t have a browser to support that fully could be a good primer to buy Opera, that would be rare. Especially after Opera has openly slammed them about the Acid 2 test. 

Still though, this site shows little experience in the web design and development arena, much of the articles noticed in this regard are filled with little expertise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, no:<br />
<a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39243639,00.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39243639,00.htm' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/applications/0,39020384,39243639,00.htm</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see MS bowing out &#8212; again, activex. While their attempts at pitching Web 2.0 when they really don&#8217;t have a browser to support that fully could be a good primer to buy Opera, that would be rare. Especially after Opera has openly slammed them about the Acid 2 test. </p>
<p>Still though, this site shows little experience in the web design and development arena, much of the articles noticed in this regard are filled with little expertise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83802</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83802</guid>
		<description>Hey Bovine..learn how to read a blog, you idiot. Here:
http://www.dvorak.org/blog/primer/blogprimer1.htm this may be a good start for you.

My column in Marketwatch is based on the obvious, nothing more. It was originally written with the angle that I was recommending MIcrosoft buy Opera. But as I wrote out the details it became apparent to me that a deal might already be in the works (hence the Mac announcment) so I changed it to a speculative column. Not mentioned is that Board member of Opera, John Patrick, is an ex-IBMer who worked with Microsoft before. He may have been brought on to the board in the ifrst place for his contacts with the M&amp;A angle from the beginning.

If there was a deal brewing, as some gossip rags now suggest, it may have actually been queered or at least screwed up by the Marketwatch column.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bovine..learn how to read a blog, you idiot. Here:<br />
<a href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/primer/blogprimer1.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/primer/blogprimer1.htm' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/primer/blogprimer1.htm</a> this may be a good start for you.</p>
<p>My column in Marketwatch is based on the obvious, nothing more. It was originally written with the angle that I was recommending MIcrosoft buy Opera. But as I wrote out the details it became apparent to me that a deal might already be in the works (hence the Mac announcment) so I changed it to a speculative column. Not mentioned is that Board member of Opera, John Patrick, is an ex-IBMer who worked with Microsoft before. He may have been brought on to the board in the ifrst place for his contacts with the M&amp;A angle from the beginning.</p>
<p>If there was a deal brewing, as some gossip rags now suggest, it may have actually been queered or at least screwed up by the Marketwatch column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Newlin</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83801</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Newlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83801</guid>
		<description>JoAnn, the point of a headline is to grab your attention.  My posting was very clear that it was unconfirmed and merely a rumor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoAnn, the point of a headline is to grab your attention.  My posting was very clear that it was unconfirmed and merely a rumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83799</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83799</guid>
		<description>Strange . . .

The folks at Opera know NOTHING about this, they are LTAO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange . . .</p>
<p>The folks at Opera know NOTHING about this, they are LTAO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dvorak reader</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83798</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvorak reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83798</guid>
		<description>Mopod 2.0 with RFID rootkit technology will mean that you don&#039;t need keys.  No more lost keys to search for with no more keys.  Do everything in the mop browser with digital rights management.  Where do you want to go today?  We already know.  With Chip in a Kid 2.0, finding the little ones is just a search box away.  Now ported to Xbox 360&#124;2.0.  Because life is a game.

Mopera-A Web 2.0 Inc. company.
PS: Clean up with Mopera.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mopod 2.0 with RFID rootkit technology will mean that you don&#8217;t need keys.  No more lost keys to search for with no more keys.  Do everything in the mop browser with digital rights management.  Where do you want to go today?  We already know.  With Chip in a Kid 2.0, finding the little ones is just a search box away.  Now ported to Xbox 360|2.0.  Because life is a game.</p>
<p>Mopera-A Web 2.0 Inc. company.<br />
PS: Clean up with Mopera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dvorak reader</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83795</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvorak reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83795</guid>
		<description>We better wait for John to offer an analysis of this whole thing.
I&#039;m sure he know a good deal about it.  Please John, give us the facts here.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We better wait for John to offer an analysis of this whole thing.<br />
I&#8217;m sure he know a good deal about it.  Please John, give us the facts here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dvorak reader</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83792</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvorak reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 16:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83792</guid>
		<description>Mopera mobile from Mod Squad
2005 was the year of the ipod.  

For 2006 it&#039;s all about the moPod
It&#039;s a browser, it&#039;s a TV, it&#039;s a Voiphone, it&#039;s a Mp3 player, it&#039;s a game, it&#039;s a GPS, it&#039;s a wifi coffee shop finder, it&#039;s a ewallet, it&#039;s a passport and it&#039;s all of this and more.  One company, one device unlimited uses.  Works without Google-Totally ad free!  $399.99 CHEAP!
The last device you will ever need.   

AM Stereo BETA testers wanted.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mopera mobile from Mod Squad<br />
2005 was the year of the ipod.  </p>
<p>For 2006 it&#8217;s all about the moPod<br />
It&#8217;s a browser, it&#8217;s a TV, it&#8217;s a Voiphone, it&#8217;s a Mp3 player, it&#8217;s a game, it&#8217;s a GPS, it&#8217;s a wifi coffee shop finder, it&#8217;s a ewallet, it&#8217;s a passport and it&#8217;s all of this and more.  One company, one device unlimited uses.  Works without Google-Totally ad free!  $399.99 CHEAP!<br />
The last device you will ever need.   </p>
<p>AM Stereo BETA testers wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eideard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83788</link>
		<dc:creator>Eideard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83788</guid>
		<description>James -- have you ever tried wandering anywhere on the Web with the IE version for Mac?  It always was a piece of useless crap.  You couldn&#039;t get a readable page most places.  Especially if the page came up to design spec.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8212; have you ever tried wandering anywhere on the Web with the IE version for Mac?  It always was a piece of useless crap.  You couldn&#8217;t get a readable page most places.  Especially if the page came up to design spec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AB CD</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83785</link>
		<dc:creator>AB CD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83785</guid>
		<description>Why would they need Opera?  IE already has tabbed browsing, and didn&#039;t Opera&#039;s workspace start with MS Word?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would they need Opera?  IE already has tabbed browsing, and didn&#8217;t Opera&#8217;s workspace start with MS Word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83782</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83782</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty hard to be wrong twice on a subject, but you&#039;ve done well.

Could it be that this is bull, and M$ only dropped Apple support because a sub-3% closed platform isn&#039;t worth working on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty hard to be wrong twice on a subject, but you&#8217;ve done well.</p>
<p>Could it be that this is bull, and M$ only dropped Apple support because a sub-3% closed platform isn&#8217;t worth working on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dvorak reader</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2005/12/23/microsoft-buys-the-opera-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-83779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dvorak reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=3641#comment-83779</guid>
		<description>Microsoft and Opera introduce
Mopera-The new browser for all your Web 2.0 needs.
Potential for BUZZ
It&#039;s a messy world.  You need Mopera! (Mopera 2.0 Coming Soon)
Visit the Mopera Blog-Used by the janitor at Googleplex!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft and Opera introduce<br />
Mopera-The new browser for all your Web 2.0 needs.<br />
Potential for BUZZ<br />
It&#8217;s a messy world.  You need Mopera! (Mopera 2.0 Coming Soon)<br />
Visit the Mopera Blog-Used by the janitor at Googleplex!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
