<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBS quietly dumps Google&#8217;s video service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:37:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91331</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 19:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91331</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Update: According to Market Watch, CBS is in talks with Apple to distribute its shows on iTunes.&lt;/i&gt;

I was wondering why CBS would be wanting to invest in all the infrastructure needed to sell downloadable videos.

Like &#039;em or not, Apple has been beta-testing this concept for &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt; via their Quicktime movie trailer site, followed by the [use ta bee] free music videos on iTunes.

Now they are selling music videos and TV shows on the iTMS.

Why try and duplicate that effort/investment for an individual networks shows, when it is probably only profitable when a broader range of programing is offered on a given site?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Update: According to Market Watch, CBS is in talks with Apple to distribute its shows on iTunes.</i></p>
<p>I was wondering why CBS would be wanting to invest in all the infrastructure needed to sell downloadable videos.</p>
<p>Like &#8216;em or not, Apple has been beta-testing this concept for <i>years</i> via their Quicktime movie trailer site, followed by the [use ta bee] free music videos on iTunes.</p>
<p>Now they are selling music videos and TV shows on the iTMS.</p>
<p>Why try and duplicate that effort/investment for an individual networks shows, when it is probably only profitable when a broader range of programing is offered on a given site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91212</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91212</guid>
		<description>Any recording exec can tell you that not every record will be a hit. Any auto maker can tell you that not every car is a hit. Any software company can tell you that not all software is a hit. Maybe Google needs some fine tuning to make a market. Maybe people just aren&#039;t all that interested in buying last year&#039;s Survivor Guatemala. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any recording exec can tell you that not every record will be a hit. Any auto maker can tell you that not every car is a hit. Any software company can tell you that not all software is a hit. Maybe Google needs some fine tuning to make a market. Maybe people just aren&#8217;t all that interested in buying last year&#8217;s Survivor Guatemala.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raindog</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91158</link>
		<dc:creator>raindog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91158</guid>
		<description>My partner and I used Froogle extensively to do our xmas shopping this year.  I find it invaluable now that Pricewatch has become a largely useless advertisement for no-name non-English-speaking fly-by-night outfits who&#039;ve learned to spam Pricewatch&#039;s search.

Not only that, but Froogle covers non-tech products from non-tech vendors, and its price parsing is right on about 95% of the time now.

Anyway, it wouldn&#039;t be Web 2.0 if it didn&#039;t say &quot;Beta&quot; on it...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My partner and I used Froogle extensively to do our xmas shopping this year.  I find it invaluable now that Pricewatch has become a largely useless advertisement for no-name non-English-speaking fly-by-night outfits who&#8217;ve learned to spam Pricewatch&#8217;s search.</p>
<p>Not only that, but Froogle covers non-tech products from non-tech vendors, and its price parsing is right on about 95% of the time now.</p>
<p>Anyway, it wouldn&#8217;t be Web 2.0 if it didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Beta&#8221; on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incognito</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91154</link>
		<dc:creator>Incognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91154</guid>
		<description>People always crack me up talking about google is going to make a UI.  As if anything they&#039;ve designed that actually takes effort looked beautiful and was that complicated.

Google entered the world of business talking lots of smack about being the common man&#039;s business and had their lax rules. 

They got their ass kicked two days back on earnings and lost a lot of money on their stock.  Going from 430 to 380 once the news hit.

Seems they have some measuring up to do.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People always crack me up talking about google is going to make a UI.  As if anything they&#8217;ve designed that actually takes effort looked beautiful and was that complicated.</p>
<p>Google entered the world of business talking lots of smack about being the common man&#8217;s business and had their lax rules. </p>
<p>They got their ass kicked two days back on earnings and lost a lot of money on their stock.  Going from 430 to 380 once the news hit.</p>
<p>Seems they have some measuring up to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91133</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 18:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91133</guid>
		<description>I use Froogle to check out prices quite a lot actually. It&#039;s very useful.

Lost of people I know do as well. It&#039;s perfect for &quot;shopping around&quot; online.

Google Video will have it&#039;s day, it&#039;s just not today. They need a good UI designer working on it. Atm it&#039;s like a programmers fun project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Froogle to check out prices quite a lot actually. It&#8217;s very useful.</p>
<p>Lost of people I know do as well. It&#8217;s perfect for &#8220;shopping around&#8221; online.</p>
<p>Google Video will have it&#8217;s day, it&#8217;s just not today. They need a good UI designer working on it. Atm it&#8217;s like a programmers fun project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91116</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91116</guid>
		<description>Remember: the most successful are the ones that have failed the most. Babe Ruth was the homerun king, but he was also the strikeout queen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember: the most successful are the ones that have failed the most. Babe Ruth was the homerun king, but he was also the strikeout queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/03/cbs-dumps-googles-video-service/comment-page-1/#comment-91108</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4107#comment-91108</guid>
		<description>let&#039;s not forget google pack!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>let&#8217;s not forget google pack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

