<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gendarmes dump IE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-92184</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 20:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-92184</guid>
		<description>Is this part of the back lash because M$ won&#039;t share the source code for Windows? 

Maybe the French Police don&#039;t want to be held hostage to M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this part of the back lash because M$ won&#8217;t share the source code for Windows? </p>
<p>Maybe the French Police don&#8217;t want to be held hostage to M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-91822</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 21:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-91822</guid>
		<description>Its one thing for a website to be slightly buggy on Firefox, Opera, ect, buts its quite another when the website is designed to work with IE and only IE leaving other users high and dry.  Now this wouldn&#039;t be so much a problem for Windows users, but for mac and linux users, there is no IE and no way to view the page.  M$ is doing the same thing with Media Player, dropping suport for all except is Windows platform  while at the same time forcing its WMV on everyone as the defacto web standard (Bill Gate&#039;s vision anyway) that only plays well on Media Player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its one thing for a website to be slightly buggy on Firefox, Opera, ect, buts its quite another when the website is designed to work with IE and only IE leaving other users high and dry.  Now this wouldn&#8217;t be so much a problem for Windows users, but for mac and linux users, there is no IE and no way to view the page.  M$ is doing the same thing with Media Player, dropping suport for all except is Windows platform  while at the same time forcing its WMV on everyone as the defacto web standard (Bill Gate&#8217;s vision anyway) that only plays well on Media Player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-91788</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 19:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-91788</guid>
		<description>For the love of God...

I&#039;m a standards advocate, and I strong believe in the whole &quot;web professional&quot; thing... but bitching about some minor validation errors (especially the &amp; thing) is counter productive.

I agree that it is easy to validate, but every browser displays those little errors fine. Lets start with the big stuff that actually breaks browsers first? Both IE and FF (and Opera &amp; Safari for that matter) still have bugs that make web design very annoying. IE7 seems to be heading the right way.. or at least catching up a bit. 

Lets pick our battles and not come across as arrogant, irelevant, zealots huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the love of God&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a standards advocate, and I strong believe in the whole &#8220;web professional&#8221; thing&#8230; but bitching about some minor validation errors (especially the &amp; thing) is counter productive.</p>
<p>I agree that it is easy to validate, but every browser displays those little errors fine. Lets start with the big stuff that actually breaks browsers first? Both IE and FF (and Opera &amp; Safari for that matter) still have bugs that make web design very annoying. IE7 seems to be heading the right way.. or at least catching up a bit. </p>
<p>Lets pick our battles and not come across as arrogant, irelevant, zealots huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-91761</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Flowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-91761</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time the &quot;mainstream&quot; world is figuring out how great FireFox is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time the &#8220;mainstream&#8221; world is figuring out how great FireFox is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady J. Frey</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-91760</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady J. Frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-91760</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re not building for standards, you&#039;ve lost your edge in our business, and you aren&#039;t a web professional. Mine, and other industry designers, growing client redesign list from other firms is very telling of this.

Does this mean that dvorak.org will hire a professional to fix their lame bugs, and outdated use of the break tag:)? You&#039;ve got 292 errors in this page alone -- half of them because you need to properly use closed tags in xhtml or, if you&#039;re not experienced enough, just start using html (for the love of god, code an ampersand properly):
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvorak.org%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D4149

Until that time, i&#039;m not so sure why you&#039;re happy posting about firefox&#039;s adoption? Your site is part of the problem.

And no crying that it&#039;s near impossible to validate -- there are many, more complex sites, that do it with ease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not building for standards, you&#8217;ve lost your edge in our business, and you aren&#8217;t a web professional. Mine, and other industry designers, growing client redesign list from other firms is very telling of this.</p>
<p>Does this mean that dvorak.org will hire a professional to fix their lame bugs, and outdated use of the break tag:)? You&#8217;ve got 292 errors in this page alone &#8212; half of them because you need to properly use closed tags in xhtml or, if you&#8217;re not experienced enough, just start using html (for the love of god, code an ampersand properly):<br />
<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvorak.org%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D4149" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvorak.org%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D4149' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvorak.org%2Fblog%2F%3Fp%3D4149</a></p>
<p>Until that time, i&#8217;m not so sure why you&#8217;re happy posting about firefox&#8217;s adoption? Your site is part of the problem.</p>
<p>And no crying that it&#8217;s near impossible to validate &#8212; there are many, more complex sites, that do it with ease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/02/06/gendarmes-dump-ie/comment-page-1/#comment-91753</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=4149#comment-91753</guid>
		<description>Great, now you just have to get all the bone head webmasters to stop making their website hostile to anything other then IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now you just have to get all the bone head webmasters to stop making their website hostile to anything other then IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
