
Newest stars: Hicks and McPhee
Deconstructing American Idol
I was amused by the fact that the American Idol show wrapped up with over 60 million people actually voting for the finalists. People take more interest in this than they do politics. Maybe through this show we should pick our next President. You can have the three nasty panelists grill the candidates then make them give a speech.
While this show is a phenomenon, the concept is very old. In broadcasting it began in the 1930′s with the Original Amateur Hour. This was a kindler, gentler format that eventually used an applause meter to determine winners and losers. It did not take itself so seriously. This sort of format lasted until around 1970. There were variations on this theme that were eventually mocked by the popular Gong Show which was essentially a parody of all amateur hour type competitions. The parody essentially killed off the old model and in 1983 a new model emerged called Star Search. It introduced the single elimination one-to-one match-game tournament style of competition. In its original form it lasted 12 years and managed to discover an incredible array of talent from Dennis Miller to Britney Spears.
American Idol uses the same single-elimination tournament model but added elements of the Gong Show with three on-stage judges and scenes of humiliation. It also added a back room “behind the scenes” element taken from sports locker room interviews to add pathos and supposed insight as well as a human connection to the audience. This was topped with TV audience participation utilizing over-the-phone voting. The show also took only the most over-weighted aspect of amateur competitions: singing, and made it the specialty. Comics and dancers and jugglers could look elsewhere to be discovered. Whether Simon Cowles, the producer (and mean-spirited judge), actually knew what he was doing when this show was developed remains to be seen. His spin-off, American Inventor, seems to indicate otherwise. This show may actually be a case where network meddling resulted in a winner. A rare bird ifso.
Improving the model.
The only way to improve the current model would be to do the obvious, change the basic model from a single elimination tournament to a double elimination tournament. In double elimination you have to lose twice to be eliminated. The folks who lose the first time go into the losers rounds which are essentially death matches. This format would keep audience favorites in play to potentially win at the end in a showdown with a hated rival in the winners round. This sort of tournament style is underutilized in sports since it takes longer to complete, about twice as long in fact. But with a show like American Idol it could be added to increase the show frequency and network profits. It would add a new element of drama and the show ratings would go even higher. And the viewers would perceive it as “more fair and honest” and thus be more attracted for a longer time period.












Maybe if Bush took singing lessons people will actually like him.
I think Clinton on the Sax was bad enough.
Even though I used to delight in winning local contests of this sort [blush], it makes me wonder about universal suffrage sometimes.
That’s only sometimes.
The only thing I want Bush to sing is:
“Nana, na, na…Nana, na, na…Hey, Hey, Hey…Goodbye!”
Comics and dancers and jugglers could look elsewhere to be discovered.
Haven’t I seen ads for a new show to fill this void in our lives… [grin]
Seriously, if Idol had an electoral college, you can bet the participation would be as dismal as that for the presidential elections.
By the same token, if we could text-message multiple, speed-dialed votes to a presidential election – voter participation would go through the roof !!!
Last Comic Standing is close. You Think You Can Dance is another..
But I want the Juggler showdown!
It’s a tad bit more work to drive to a polling site and make a decision based upon candidates’ policy proposals (when most people don’t even know or care about the details), than it is to watch an hour long talent show and call the number for the one you liked the best.
And I’d be willing to bet that a majority of the people who do vote, simply vote along party lines anyway.
There were over 60 million votes, but people were able to vote as many times as they liked. Also, people under 18 could vote. So I think there was probably nowhere near 60 million unique voters and certainly not that many who would be eligible to vote in an election. It is an impressive number, if a little misleading.
I wouldn’t argue with the assertion that the attention this karaoke show receives is astounding.
If you saw him interviewed, Trent Lott said he voted “many times — and often”. His favorite show. Of course.
The 60 million number is misleading since the same person can vote multiple times from the same phoneline, not to mention the automatic dialers they have on the web.
Typical of the dumbing down of America. Where it is cool to be stupid, geeky to be smart. Stupid reality shows everywhere but a lack of interest in the real world. Majority of young people couldn’t identify Dick Chaney as the VP and don’t know were Iraq is on the map. Very sad indeed.
“…an incredible array of talent from Dennis Miller to Britney Spears.” A good enough reason to ban these things forever.
One thing about the number of votes: Its not that 60 million people voted because you have most people voting at least twice if not more. The comparison to presidential politics isn’t quite right. I just want to point out our democracy isn’t in that bad of trouble.
This show is a phenomenon because it touches the very core of what Americans hold as their highest virtues: hope and FAME. American idol is a rags-to-riches tale. Ordinary folks who make it to the top. And some of the winners have actually made millions of dollars selling CDs (the fat, black guy being one of the exceptions, although his runner-up made the most of all of them–something like 27 million dollars). I was on the nerve.com personals site where I could not compete with the other bachelors, mostly because I’m non-white and poor. The site has interesting feature where you could see who were the top profiles. When I looked (about two months ago) the top male profile was a FILM DIRECTOR. He had photos of himself behind a camera on a set. A film director. That says it all. American people just want to be famous, women in particular. Of course that guy would be the most popular profile, HE COULD MAKE THEM FAMOUS.
Sorry state of affairs if you ask me.
David, do what most people in Hollywood do..just SAY you are a film director.
Lying, John? I’m a sucker for being honest. And I tell you from experience, honesty gets you nowhere in life.
Prince was at the final episode. That guy hasn’t aged a bit and I was glad that he hasn’t lost that 80′s spunk. The rest of the show seemed stale compared to his performance with the exception of E. Yamin’s final song.
Personally I was blown away by the show last night. The group vocals outstanding, the combination of guest stars / contestants singing duals was great, guest appearances of some singing greats unexpected and delightful. I cheer this wholesome fun entertainment – well done! I thought the atmosphere electric. Considering it was live the two hours went very smoothly and was well orchestrated. Maybe it helps to be over 50…
Wow – is that Leo Laporte?
John,
I think the one I saw ads for was Simon Cowell’s new “America’s Got Talent” – with host Regis Philben – which starts June 21.
http://talkshows.about.com/b/a/253169.htm