<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frozen chip smokes at 500 GHz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-2/#comment-184353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-184353</guid>
		<description>think if you got one of these to multiplex quick enough, glued a couple of strands of fiber to it and youd probably be able to replace a good load of servers out there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>think if you got one of these to multiplex quick enough, glued a couple of strands of fiber to it and youd probably be able to replace a good load of servers out there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. H. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-183357</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. H. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 03:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-183357</guid>
		<description>#19, How much memory will be required?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19, How much memory will be required?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdgbill</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-182926</link>
		<dc:creator>bdgbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-182926</guid>
		<description>Windows 2015 &quot;Armageddon Edition&quot; System Requirements:

IBM compatible 1 THtz or better (2 THtz with liquid helium cooling for &quot;Aero Glass&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 2015 &#8220;Armageddon Edition&#8221; System Requirements:</p>
<p>IBM compatible 1 THtz or better (2 THtz with liquid helium cooling for &#8220;Aero Glass&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. H. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-182569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. H. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 15:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-182569</guid>
		<description>The closer one gets to absolute zero, the less friction and heat is produced. Running at -450 F would reduce electrical friction to near zero resulting in little heat. Maybe if they really over clocked the chip they could have achieved even higher ratings.

The good news is that at some point in the future, this breakthrough will influence our PC processors. When is anyone&#039;s guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The closer one gets to absolute zero, the less friction and heat is produced. Running at -450 F would reduce electrical friction to near zero resulting in little heat. Maybe if they really over clocked the chip they could have achieved even higher ratings.</p>
<p>The good news is that at some point in the future, this breakthrough will influence our PC processors. When is anyone&#8217;s guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-182493</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-182493</guid>
		<description>500Ghz is impressive.  But, when are computers going to work for people instead of the other way around?  &quot;Computer User&quot; is a misnomer.  We are all &quot;computer usees&quot;.  These boxes are still very stupid no matter how guickly they are stupid.  They&#039;re as tempermental as a barrel full of chiuauas with ADHD on crystal meth.  As one wag said, &quot;We don&#039;t need anymore Search engines, we only need a good Find engine.&quot;  The same holds true for all this &quot;grey goo&quot;.  We need computers that act on our behalf not on our command (or not).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>500Ghz is impressive.  But, when are computers going to work for people instead of the other way around?  &#8220;Computer User&#8221; is a misnomer.  We are all &#8220;computer usees&#8221;.  These boxes are still very stupid no matter how guickly they are stupid.  They&#8217;re as tempermental as a barrel full of chiuauas with ADHD on crystal meth.  As one wag said, &#8220;We don&#8217;t need anymore Search engines, we only need a good Find engine.&#8221;  The same holds true for all this &#8220;grey goo&#8221;.  We need computers that act on our behalf not on our command (or not).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wofford</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-182423</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wofford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-182423</guid>
		<description>Wall sized screens with interactive porno will be here soon, and that should spark a few comments, pro and con. And I can see that the thermal issues will spring from more than just CPU heat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wall sized screens with interactive porno will be here soon, and that should spark a few comments, pro and con. And I can see that the thermal issues will spring from more than just CPU heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181802</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181802</guid>
		<description>According to the article linked, it&#039;s a chip. It could be a chip with one or very few transistors, but that would not invalidate the technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to the article linked, it&#8217;s a chip. It could be a chip with one or very few transistors, but that would not invalidate the technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark T.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181790</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181790</guid>
		<description>Oops, 500 GHz is 1/2 terrahertz.  Sorry for the fau paux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, 500 GHz is 1/2 terrahertz.  Sorry for the fau paux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark T.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 02:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181784</guid>
		<description>The articles all state that it is an IBM microprocessor.  If this was just one transistor, than these news reports are pretty misleading or just simply uniformed.

So, if a CPU is designed with this technology, what can be expected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The articles all state that it is an IBM microprocessor.  If this was just one transistor, than these news reports are pretty misleading or just simply uniformed.</p>
<p>So, if a CPU is designed with this technology, what can be expected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedFox</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181740</link>
		<dc:creator>TedFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181740</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re looking at 500 GHz for a single transistor, 350 GHz at room temperature.

an actual processor chip would be much slower.

the 2 GHz refers to carrier frequency, not any form of processing power, as it&#039;s only a single transistor

http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/ibm-git-overclock-cpu-to-500ghz/#c1632262</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re looking at 500 GHz for a single transistor, 350 GHz at room temperature.</p>
<p>an actual processor chip would be much slower.</p>
<p>the 2 GHz refers to carrier frequency, not any form of processing power, as it&#8217;s only a single transistor</p>
<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/ibm-git-overclock-cpu-to-500ghz/#c1632262" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/ibm-git-overclock-cpu-to-500ghz/#c1632262' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/20/ibm-git-overclock-cpu-to-500ghz/#c1632262</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181731</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181731</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a cool related tech:

High-K tech uses less power while operating faster
http://www.eebeat.com/?p=266
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a cool related tech:</p>
<p>High-K tech uses less power while operating faster<br />
<a href="http://www.eebeat.com/?p=266" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.eebeat.com/?p=266' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.eebeat.com/?p=266</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark T.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181676</guid>
		<description>If it runs at 350 GHz at room temp then I would have guessed it would run  much faster than 500 GHz at absolute zero.  Why such a (relatively) small increase?  The article states that they pushed it to 500 GHz.  I bet it will go much higher with a little tinkering.

Has anyone found any more details on this new silicon/germanium chip technology?  Details on the news reports are dumbed down for the layman.

Update.  I just found this site:

http://tinyurl.com/m5d63

IBM has simulations that indicate that the technology could go as high as 1000 GHz.  What would that be?  A picahertz?  Awesome stuff.  Imagine a PS4 with one of those babies!

This article says that it could result in 160 GHz wireless technology:

http://tinyurl.com/rqdhu

Another article said that it would likely mean 60 GHz wireless capability in the near term:

http://tinyurl.com/m5d63

The future looks bright!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it runs at 350 GHz at room temp then I would have guessed it would run  much faster than 500 GHz at absolute zero.  Why such a (relatively) small increase?  The article states that they pushed it to 500 GHz.  I bet it will go much higher with a little tinkering.</p>
<p>Has anyone found any more details on this new silicon/germanium chip technology?  Details on the news reports are dumbed down for the layman.</p>
<p>Update.  I just found this site:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/m5d63" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/m5d63' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/m5d63</a></p>
<p>IBM has simulations that indicate that the technology could go as high as 1000 GHz.  What would that be?  A picahertz?  Awesome stuff.  Imagine a PS4 with one of those babies!</p>
<p>This article says that it could result in 160 GHz wireless technology:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/rqdhu" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/rqdhu' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/rqdhu</a></p>
<p>Another article said that it would likely mean 60 GHz wireless capability in the near term:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/m5d63" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/m5d63' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/m5d63</a></p>
<p>The future looks bright!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181530</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181530</guid>
		<description>How much waste heat would be created at 350 GHz? Methinks one would still need some radical cooling even if using this chip at &quot;room temperature&quot;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much waste heat would be created at 350 GHz? Methinks one would still need some radical cooling even if using this chip at &#8220;room temperature&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidtheDuke</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181425</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidtheDuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181425</guid>
		<description>The only is your electric bill might be 2k a month running this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only is your electric bill might be 2k a month running this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce IV</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/20/frozen-chip-smokes-at-500-ghz/comment-page-1/#comment-181421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5811#comment-181421</guid>
		<description>Gregory (3) has the right point - 350 GHz at room temperature -&gt; that&#039;s the insane part ... when can they do that large-scale?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory (3) has the right point &#8211; 350 GHz at room temperature -&gt; that&#8217;s the insane part &#8230; when can they do that large-scale?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

