<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Record for LED Lumens-per-watt. The End is Near!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kw</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1519272</link>
		<dc:creator>kw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 20:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1519272</guid>
		<description>Lower the cost of LED technolgy in the US and it will evolve over night.

Why is the mark up in the states so high compaired to the overseas prices of LED components?

Because its new to the U.S., GREED inflaits the price and slows the progress as usual!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lower the cost of LED technolgy in the US and it will evolve over night.</p>
<p>Why is the mark up in the states so high compaired to the overseas prices of LED components?</p>
<p>Because its new to the U.S., GREED inflaits the price and slows the progress as usual!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nwimpney</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1416782</link>
		<dc:creator>nwimpney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1416782</guid>
		<description>#38 Yeah, The typical CRI listed for a Luxeon K2 cool white is 70.  I think that&#039;s probably in the ballpark of a poor quality fluorescent tube.  

Generally most white leds are blue with an orange-yellow phosphor.  They tend to do a mediocre job illuminating red and green objects.

I think the Red+Green+Blue method could work better, though it probably will be less efficient.

To be fair though, most high CRI tubes tend to have less light output than cheap ones.  This is mostly due to the fact that lumens are weighted to a model of the human eye, where yellow and green are picked up much brighter than red and blue.

This is the reason the orange sodium street lamps are so efficient.

I have to strongly disagree with everyone who thinks incandescent lamps should be banned, though.

1. Incandescent bulbs are very good in extreme conditions.  You can&#039;t use LED or fluorescent in an oven, and they respond very differently to cold temperatures.  A standard bulb is fine in the cold.  Fluorescents are hard to start, and give less light until they warm up.  LEDs generally get brighter, and white ones tend to give more blue light, while the yellow light from the phosphor doesn&#039;t increase to the same degree.  CFLs (and presumably leds) shouldn&#039;t be used in enclosed lights, because the heat build up kills the electrolytic caps that are usually in their switching circuits (in the power supply section)

2. Incandescent bulbs are a linear load, and can be built to operate at the correct voltage, without an additional power supply.  (Lots of loss in the supplies/regulators, generally)

3. Incandescent bulbs take much less energy to produce.  A typical bulb is about 1kWh to build IIRC, conservatively, a cfl is 10 times that.  LED&#039;s probably similar, due to supporting electronics.

4. CFLs are bad where they&#039;re frequently turned on/off for short durations. (Bathroom light, etc)  They often give poor light for a short time, and their lifespans are usually quite poor when they&#039;re used this way.

5. Mercury (for CFL)  I&#039;m not going to get all alarmist about this one..  The amount is small, but still worth keeping in mind.

6. LED, and Fluorescent tend to flicker. (Especially led)  The phosphors can be made slower which tends to help with fluorescent, but with LED there&#039;s still going to be some colour dependent flicker, since the blue light is flickering, even if the phosphor isn&#039;t.
A smoothed DC supply will give better light, but will add extra power loss, and noise.

I could go on forever, but I think the point is clear.  High efficiency lighting is awesome, and everyone should use it where it&#039;s appropriate, but banning incandescent is a really bad idea.  Also, my apartment has electric heat, so any energy &quot;savings&quot; in the winter is completely null.  My heating will go up an equivalent amount, and environmentally speaking, it&#039;s worse, since energy is required to produce the &quot;energy saving&quot; stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#38 Yeah, The typical CRI listed for a Luxeon K2 cool white is 70.  I think that&#8217;s probably in the ballpark of a poor quality fluorescent tube.  </p>
<p>Generally most white leds are blue with an orange-yellow phosphor.  They tend to do a mediocre job illuminating red and green objects.</p>
<p>I think the Red+Green+Blue method could work better, though it probably will be less efficient.</p>
<p>To be fair though, most high CRI tubes tend to have less light output than cheap ones.  This is mostly due to the fact that lumens are weighted to a model of the human eye, where yellow and green are picked up much brighter than red and blue.</p>
<p>This is the reason the orange sodium street lamps are so efficient.</p>
<p>I have to strongly disagree with everyone who thinks incandescent lamps should be banned, though.</p>
<p>1. Incandescent bulbs are very good in extreme conditions.  You can&#8217;t use LED or fluorescent in an oven, and they respond very differently to cold temperatures.  A standard bulb is fine in the cold.  Fluorescents are hard to start, and give less light until they warm up.  LEDs generally get brighter, and white ones tend to give more blue light, while the yellow light from the phosphor doesn&#8217;t increase to the same degree.  CFLs (and presumably leds) shouldn&#8217;t be used in enclosed lights, because the heat build up kills the electrolytic caps that are usually in their switching circuits (in the power supply section)</p>
<p>2. Incandescent bulbs are a linear load, and can be built to operate at the correct voltage, without an additional power supply.  (Lots of loss in the supplies/regulators, generally)</p>
<p>3. Incandescent bulbs take much less energy to produce.  A typical bulb is about 1kWh to build IIRC, conservatively, a cfl is 10 times that.  LED&#8217;s probably similar, due to supporting electronics.</p>
<p>4. CFLs are bad where they&#8217;re frequently turned on/off for short durations. (Bathroom light, etc)  They often give poor light for a short time, and their lifespans are usually quite poor when they&#8217;re used this way.</p>
<p>5. Mercury (for CFL)  I&#8217;m not going to get all alarmist about this one..  The amount is small, but still worth keeping in mind.</p>
<p>6. LED, and Fluorescent tend to flicker. (Especially led)  The phosphors can be made slower which tends to help with fluorescent, but with LED there&#8217;s still going to be some colour dependent flicker, since the blue light is flickering, even if the phosphor isn&#8217;t.<br />
A smoothed DC supply will give better light, but will add extra power loss, and noise.</p>
<p>I could go on forever, but I think the point is clear.  High efficiency lighting is awesome, and everyone should use it where it&#8217;s appropriate, but banning incandescent is a really bad idea.  Also, my apartment has electric heat, so any energy &#8220;savings&#8221; in the winter is completely null.  My heating will go up an equivalent amount, and environmentally speaking, it&#8217;s worse, since energy is required to produce the &#8220;energy saving&#8221; stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wetnap</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1213778</link>
		<dc:creator>wetnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1213778</guid>
		<description>still waiting for one of these super leds to show up at retail at a reasonable price!

damn press releases:(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>still waiting for one of these super leds to show up at retail at a reasonable price!</p>
<p>damn press releases:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1193659</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1193659</guid>
		<description>Everyone is all excited, but NO mention has been made about the Color Rendition Index of this &quot;super LED&quot;.  It hardly matters if it puts out 131 lpw, if the light is abominable.  LEDs still have a ways to go before they can compete with best linear fluorescents which can put out almost 90 lpw, AND have excellent color rendition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is all excited, but NO mention has been made about the Color Rendition Index of this &#8220;super LED&#8221;.  It hardly matters if it puts out 131 lpw, if the light is abominable.  LEDs still have a ways to go before they can compete with best linear fluorescents which can put out almost 90 lpw, AND have excellent color rendition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sérgio Santos</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1132682</link>
		<dc:creator>Sérgio Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1132682</guid>
		<description>If a separate circuit was made using car bateries or dc cells, with a electronic control system, then with a fotovoltage panel to charge de bateries, also with electronic control with alternate cells in service for a house ilumination system using Ultra light leds, i think ilumination would be very simply free, free. The downfall is only the convencional light to be substituted with a larger quantity of leds to obtain the same lumens per watt. Note that a led uses aproximately only 90mW but is necessary about 80 leds to obtain 800 lumens, witch is the same as a 40Watt convencional lamp. I think this has not yet happened due to be a revolution in the market, not good when money envolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a separate circuit was made using car bateries or dc cells, with a electronic control system, then with a fotovoltage panel to charge de bateries, also with electronic control with alternate cells in service for a house ilumination system using Ultra light leds, i think ilumination would be very simply free, free. The downfall is only the convencional light to be substituted with a larger quantity of leds to obtain the same lumens per watt. Note that a led uses aproximately only 90mW but is necessary about 80 leds to obtain 800 lumens, witch is the same as a 40Watt convencional lamp. I think this has not yet happened due to be a revolution in the market, not good when money envolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECA</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1044212</link>
		<dc:creator>ECA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 10:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1044212</guid>
		<description>35,
CORRECT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>35,<br />
CORRECT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lee</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1044117</link>
		<dc:creator>lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1044117</guid>
		<description>Well it all sounds great, but lets get real, do you think that us users who use less power would save money? If we all went energy saving we may help the planet but the energy company would then increase prices any how to make up their loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it all sounds great, but lets get real, do you think that us users who use less power would save money? If we all went energy saving we may help the planet but the energy company would then increase prices any how to make up their loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehuda Draiman, Energy Analyst</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-1002509</link>
		<dc:creator>Yehuda Draiman, Energy Analyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-1002509</guid>
		<description>LIGHTING ENERGY USE AUDIT

ENERGY SAVERS lighting upgrade audits provide an in-depth look at your current lighting system.  We 
•	Count and identify the type of fixtures that are 
currently in every room and area of the facility. 
•	Provide wattage information and light level 
data showing over or under illumination in 
every area of the facility. 
•	Identify areas that need new fixture design or simple retrofits. 
•	Provide before and after wattage per fixture type, and the annual savings of each type. 
Our energy audits determine what lighting fixtures will best suit your needs. We provide a comprehensive break down of current lighting fixtures, the lighting fixtures we recommend, and the expected savings on energy costs to you after implementation of new energy efficient lighting fixtures.

By doing a thorough audit of the facility it is not unusual to estimate energy savings at well over 50% of the kW used and give you a much brighter and healthier facility.
 
•	Obtain an accurate representation of the existing ballast &amp; lamp types; room, fixture and fixture placement measurements; light levels; and an accounting of other related existing conditions such as wall, floor and ceiling colors (to establish reflectance estimates where an increase or decrease in existing light levels may be recommended) and any pre-existing damage to surfaces, rugs, lenses, etc. 
•	Recommend appropriate preliminary &quot;go to&quot; measures. This information provides a baseline for the project design work. 
•	Define baselines for existing and proposed annual hours of use. This includes interviews with building managers, maintenance people and users. It often results in engineered improvements that would not be obvious with a simple audit. 
•	Reconcile the lighting annual usage with the facility’s total electricity usage. ES has established guidelines for most building types. 
•	Measure the actual RMS watts of a fair sample of the existing circuits. 
•	ES&#039;s experienced sales people, engineers and project managers are available to discuss your specific lighting needs. Request a lighting audit. We will show you how to cut costs, boost profits and enhance your working environment. 
Audit Cost
 
A complete audit costs 3 cents a square foot, plus travel expenses. The cost for an audit will be quickly made up in energy cost savings if the suggestions are implemented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LIGHTING ENERGY USE AUDIT</p>
<p>ENERGY SAVERS lighting upgrade audits provide an in-depth look at your current lighting system.  We<br />
•	Count and identify the type of fixtures that are<br />
currently in every room and area of the facility.<br />
•	Provide wattage information and light level<br />
data showing over or under illumination in<br />
every area of the facility.<br />
•	Identify areas that need new fixture design or simple retrofits.<br />
•	Provide before and after wattage per fixture type, and the annual savings of each type.<br />
Our energy audits determine what lighting fixtures will best suit your needs. We provide a comprehensive break down of current lighting fixtures, the lighting fixtures we recommend, and the expected savings on energy costs to you after implementation of new energy efficient lighting fixtures.</p>
<p>By doing a thorough audit of the facility it is not unusual to estimate energy savings at well over 50% of the kW used and give you a much brighter and healthier facility.</p>
<p>•	Obtain an accurate representation of the existing ballast &amp; lamp types; room, fixture and fixture placement measurements; light levels; and an accounting of other related existing conditions such as wall, floor and ceiling colors (to establish reflectance estimates where an increase or decrease in existing light levels may be recommended) and any pre-existing damage to surfaces, rugs, lenses, etc.<br />
•	Recommend appropriate preliminary &#8220;go to&#8221; measures. This information provides a baseline for the project design work.<br />
•	Define baselines for existing and proposed annual hours of use. This includes interviews with building managers, maintenance people and users. It often results in engineered improvements that would not be obvious with a simple audit.<br />
•	Reconcile the lighting annual usage with the facility’s total electricity usage. ES has established guidelines for most building types.<br />
•	Measure the actual RMS watts of a fair sample of the existing circuits.<br />
•	ES&#8217;s experienced sales people, engineers and project managers are available to discuss your specific lighting needs. Request a lighting audit. We will show you how to cut costs, boost profits and enhance your working environment.<br />
Audit Cost</p>
<p>A complete audit costs 3 cents a square foot, plus travel expenses. The cost for an audit will be quickly made up in energy cost savings if the suggestions are implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voice_of_Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-934314</link>
		<dc:creator>Voice_of_Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-934314</guid>
		<description>I read #5 and i had to reply.

Street lamps switched to LED would cost MORE energy. Street lamps are mostly sodium lamps (yellowish) and they are more efficient than LEDs.

And the idea of switching the whole house to 12vdc is also not particularly smart. It would decrease the efficiency of appliances, and increase the internal wire losses (there is a reason why overhead high voltage lines are in fact very high voltage).

And the idea to legally mandate the end of the incandescent is also stupid. LEDs wont work as oven lights, wont work in high quality photography, and other specialty situations.

Using Red-Green-Blue LEDs to simulate white light is also not as efficient as using &quot;white&quot; LEDs. Case in point, the 130 lumens/watt at the top of this article is for a &quot;white&quot; LED, not a Red, not a Green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read #5 and i had to reply.</p>
<p>Street lamps switched to LED would cost MORE energy. Street lamps are mostly sodium lamps (yellowish) and they are more efficient than LEDs.</p>
<p>And the idea of switching the whole house to 12vdc is also not particularly smart. It would decrease the efficiency of appliances, and increase the internal wire losses (there is a reason why overhead high voltage lines are in fact very high voltage).</p>
<p>And the idea to legally mandate the end of the incandescent is also stupid. LEDs wont work as oven lights, wont work in high quality photography, and other specialty situations.</p>
<p>Using Red-Green-Blue LEDs to simulate white light is also not as efficient as using &#8220;white&#8221; LEDs. Case in point, the 130 lumens/watt at the top of this article is for a &#8220;white&#8221; LED, not a Red, not a Green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swaroop Bhushan</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-853341</link>
		<dc:creator>Swaroop Bhushan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-853341</guid>
		<description>City of Ann Arbor, MI has already retrofitted 1600 downtown streetlights with LED lamps. Ann Arbor will be saving $100,000 per year and more importantly reducing annual greenhouse gas emissions by 267 tonnes CO2e.

Their cost analysis shows that each LED replacement lamps pays for itself in approx 3.3 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>City of Ann Arbor, MI has already retrofitted 1600 downtown streetlights with LED lamps. Ann Arbor will be saving $100,000 per year and more importantly reducing annual greenhouse gas emissions by 267 tonnes CO2e.</p>
<p>Their cost analysis shows that each LED replacement lamps pays for itself in approx 3.3 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Ladd</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-720033</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Ladd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-720033</guid>
		<description>1 - New Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) circuitry is making it possible to provide controlled current from much larger voltages with very low losses in the controller circuit.  Series regulators and resistors add losses.   It kills the overall efficiency of the fixture no matter how efficient the lamp is if the regulator is hot.

2- These PWM devices can very efficiently provide dimming funcionality.

3 - Lighting companies are mixing LEDs to get the color temperature they want.  Add in some amber, blue, red, even UV for effect.

4 - Hey, LED means much less mercury.  Compact Flours contain Hg.  Incands introduce about the same (studies show) from the additional coal burn required to power them.  

LEDs last longer use less energy and introduce considerably less Hg into the soil/atmosphere.  

Sign me up! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; New Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) circuitry is making it possible to provide controlled current from much larger voltages with very low losses in the controller circuit.  Series regulators and resistors add losses.   It kills the overall efficiency of the fixture no matter how efficient the lamp is if the regulator is hot.</p>
<p>2- These PWM devices can very efficiently provide dimming funcionality.</p>
<p>3 &#8211; Lighting companies are mixing LEDs to get the color temperature they want.  Add in some amber, blue, red, even UV for effect.</p>
<p>4 &#8211; Hey, LED means much less mercury.  Compact Flours contain Hg.  Incands introduce about the same (studies show) from the additional coal burn required to power them.  </p>
<p>LEDs last longer use less energy and introduce considerably less Hg into the soil/atmosphere.  </p>
<p>Sign me up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael mueller-luetgenau</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-460651</link>
		<dc:creator>michael mueller-luetgenau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-460651</guid>
		<description>I am missing one crucial figure: Was the record-breaking 131 lm/W  131 lm per input Watt (=consumed Wat)t or was it 131lm per Watt converted to light? It does make a difference, as the efficiency used to be about 27%!
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am missing one crucial figure: Was the record-breaking 131 lm/W  131 lm per input Watt (=consumed Wat)t or was it 131lm per Watt converted to light? It does make a difference, as the efficiency used to be about 27%!<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-448027</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 04:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-448027</guid>
		<description>133 lumens per watt is GREAT, and I know it will only get better as more research money is poured into LEDs. Lighting is said to be a $12 BILLION dollar business in the US alone, so with that much money on  the table GE, Phillips, and others will be butting heads to see who can get their products on store shelves first. Unforfunatly it will be several years until we see any of these in a store. If you want to try some LED replacement bulbs now about the best prices I have found were at www.shop.donsgreenstore.com  and they were even offering free shipping. So while we wait to pay homage to the big corporate lighing companies there are a lot of small sellers with LED bulbs right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>133 lumens per watt is GREAT, and I know it will only get better as more research money is poured into LEDs. Lighting is said to be a $12 BILLION dollar business in the US alone, so with that much money on  the table GE, Phillips, and others will be butting heads to see who can get their products on store shelves first. Unforfunatly it will be several years until we see any of these in a store. If you want to try some LED replacement bulbs now about the best prices I have found were at <a href="http://www.shop.donsgreenstore.com" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.shop.donsgreenstore.com' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.shop.donsgreenstore.com</a>  and they were even offering free shipping. So while we wait to pay homage to the big corporate lighing companies there are a lot of small sellers with LED bulbs right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-348186</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-348186</guid>
		<description>Instead of trying to get  AC changed to DC in households why not just add a circuit in the base of the &quot;light bulb&quot;. Since LEDs operate at voltages well below 12vdc and draw a known current, a simple voltage regulator circuit is not only elegant but cheep, it would be a resister (or voltage divider - suggest design for 130 vAC) full wave bridge rectifier for DC and a filter cap, or a diac/triac circuit  to feed the LED and should work even with a conventional incandescent dimmers - in mass maybe 25 to 50 cents per &quot;lamp&quot; or a custom chip at say 5 cents per in very large quantities.  Since LEDs have a life of 100,000+ hours and because of the low current there is very low heat in the base, the base (i.e. medium, candela etc) containing this circuit becomes a through away part of the light.  Note that these lites could also contain multiple LEDs as designated for high intensity lighting, three-way lights, soft reading, full spectrum daylight, amber bug lites, etc; and packaged in shapes that consumers are accustomed to using.  Additionally offer a version to run from 12v for RV / boating / camping as well as converted household wiring.

Regards,
Michael Dick
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of trying to get  AC changed to DC in households why not just add a circuit in the base of the &#8220;light bulb&#8221;. Since LEDs operate at voltages well below 12vdc and draw a known current, a simple voltage regulator circuit is not only elegant but cheep, it would be a resister (or voltage divider &#8211; suggest design for 130 vAC) full wave bridge rectifier for DC and a filter cap, or a diac/triac circuit  to feed the LED and should work even with a conventional incandescent dimmers &#8211; in mass maybe 25 to 50 cents per &#8220;lamp&#8221; or a custom chip at say 5 cents per in very large quantities.  Since LEDs have a life of 100,000+ hours and because of the low current there is very low heat in the base, the base (i.e. medium, candela etc) containing this circuit becomes a through away part of the light.  Note that these lites could also contain multiple LEDs as designated for high intensity lighting, three-way lights, soft reading, full spectrum daylight, amber bug lites, etc; and packaged in shapes that consumers are accustomed to using.  Additionally offer a version to run from 12v for RV / boating / camping as well as converted household wiring.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Michael Dick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRM</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/06/21/new-record-for-led-lumens-per-watt-the-end-is-near/comment-page-1/#comment-190554</link>
		<dc:creator>BRM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 08:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=5822#comment-190554</guid>
		<description>Just now found this site.
#14 and #20: AC works just as well as DC if  a pair of LEDs are connected reverse-parallel ( head to tail).
(each lights up twice as bright half the time, so they don&#039;t overheat.)
#15 and #17: Like the stack of batteries in a flashlight, LEDs can be stacked in series to match whatever voltage is available. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just now found this site.<br />
#14 and #20: AC works just as well as DC if  a pair of LEDs are connected reverse-parallel ( head to tail).<br />
(each lights up twice as bright half the time, so they don&#8217;t overheat.)<br />
#15 and #17: Like the stack of batteries in a flashlight, LEDs can be stacked in series to match whatever voltage is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
