Click on the chart to go to an interactive version and select a state

It’s no wonder when you have wackos like this group getting the religious press. Who wants to be associated with that?

A Kansas church group that protests at military funerals across the nation filed suit in federal court Friday, claiming a Missouri law banning such picketing infringed on religious freedom and free speech.
[...]
The church and the Rev. Fred Phelps claim God is allowing soldiers, coal miners and others to be killed because the United States tolerates homosexuals.



  1. James says:

    I am all for free protest, but at funerals. I mean come on for a bunch of people supposed to be so full of morals deliberately protesting in a way that is bound to upset the grieving people, how hypocritical can you get.

  2. GregAllen says:

    Whoever did that graphic doesn’t seem to know much about religion.

    Christianity is a religion. Islam is a religion. Hinduism is a religion.

    Baptist is a sect (or denomination) of that religion, rarely considered a totally separate religion.

    (OK, some people might divide Catholics and Protestants into two religions. I don’t.)

    Anyway, the chart should more accurately put Christianity somewhere around 75% of Missouri, which I think is close to the national average.

    When you have that large of a majority, you wouldn’t expect huge short-term swings in numbers. The smaller groups are going to have bigger swings, percentage wise. (Obvious, right?)

    I did a quick Google. Can you guess the fastest growing group? It is Wicca!

    Anyway, clearly Christianity has been declining in the USA but I would expect the influx of predominately Romans Catholics from Latin America to slow that trend but probably not reverse it.

  3. Nirendra says:

    2: Exactly. I don’t think any Christian would say “I’m not Christian, I’m Protestant”.

    It looks like this poll was split to make the numbers look like they mean more than they really do. I mean, what if 5% of Catholics in Missouri became Methodist? The numbers for Christianity as a whole don’t change, but on this graph, suddenly ‘No Religion’ is number 2!

  4. Eideard says:

    Uh, Greg, religion is on the decline in the whole world. Just a bit more slowly in the US — partly because of the influx of the less educated. Partly because of an anti-science, anti-intellectual culture. Perfectly logical phenomenon.

    As for which group is separate from whom, ask a Southern Baptist if they’re just “part” of Christianity. Then, run as fast as you can.

  5. forrest says:

    I do agree somewhat with GregAllen, however different sects of Christianity have clearly different views and values. The break down of the different Christian faiths is reflective of it. Try talking to someone who is Catholic or Protestant, they define themselves as such first, before referring to themselves as Christians. It’s similar to how people first define themselves by a particular ethnic group before calling themselves human.

  6. Smartalix says:

    You guys need to read more about the Reformation, and you may have a different opinon on the difference between Catholic and Protestant. Or just read up on the Troubles in Northern Ireland.

    There are significant differences between the two religions at every level.

  7. Nirendra says:

    6: Kind of like sunni and shi’a Muslims?

  8. bac says:

    Considering the chart is based on a poll. The questioned asked might have been worded in such a way as to get the numerous responses. For example: what is your religion, if any? Just look at the title of the chart.

  9. GregAllen says:

    Even though what I said was pretty benign, I thought I’d get some flack from it.

    Eideard >>As for which group is separate from whom, ask a Southern Baptist if they’re just “part” of Christianity. Then, run as fast as you can.

    If you asked them if they were Christian, of course they’d say yes. They would have a narrower definition of what being a “real” Christian is, but it wouldn’t be exclusively Southern Baptist, or even Baptist.

    forrest >> It’s similar to how people first define themselves by a particular ethnic group before calling themselves human.

    Very good analogy. That one also frustrates me. People often talk about the white “race” or the back “race”. OK, fine. But ultimately we are from the “human race”

    Smartalix >> There are significant differences between the two religions at every level.

    I acknowledged that one because it is debatable. Similar: Are Shiites and Sunnis two different religions or just two sects of Islam? Most Muslims say sects but some scholars might say religions.

    Eideard >> Uh, Greg, religion is on the decline in the whole world. Just a bit more slowly in the US — partly because of the influx of the less educated.

    Ouch! If we were all better educated, we’d all quit Praisin the Lord and start reading more of them thar learnin’ books. ;-)

    Well, we religious people have some room to decline since atheists make up only 2.5% of the world and, according to some, are dropping too.

    http://www.religioustolerance.org/worldrel.gif

    Atheist Decline in Recent Past and Near Future

    In the last few decades atheists and others who are radically anti-religious have been a rapidly declining percentage of world population. They are now 2.5% of world population. Agnostics and those who are indifferent to religion are also a somewhat more slowly declining percentage of the world’s population, they are now 11.5%.

  10. Matthew says:

    To #2 gregallen, it would be silly to ssume USA Today is defining Christian as a religion. They are simply charting responses to a poll; in which I’m sure some people didn’t quite fit in to any choice so they chose Christian.

    Much like our president doesn’t go to church or affiliate himself with one.

    Some people still claim to be christian but practice at home… on Sunday… in front of the television… with a beer….

  11. Manitoban says:

    You don’t need religion to believe in something. All organized religions are sects. And, when one group of people starts saying that it’s religion is better than another’s, holy wars ensue.

  12. Floyd says:

    11. gregallen: note that a lot of people in each state declare themselves as “no religion,” which means they’re agnostic, atheist, or really don’t care.

    I’m probably agnostic, which means that I think the question of the existence of a deity is by definition undecideable, and therefore not worth considering. I’m ethical however, because I feel that following one’s conscience is generally the way one should conduct one’s life. I don’t really worry about whether there’s a deity out there or not.

  13. Eideard says:

    Gee, Greg — In the US — the most recent study, by the Pew Foundation listed secular, atheist and agnostic as just under 11% of the US population. And I doubt if the US is ahead of Europe and most others on this one.

    Dude — I realize your personal ideological commitment is what you live on. But, if you look around and tell yourself the superstititious side of world ideologies is on the rise, you’re stuck with premises which are incorrect.

    Living on the materialist side of the quotient, belief system like that are only a problem for me when they try to become ruling systems, closing off inquiry and education. Otherwise — dream on!

    BTW — you might enjoy all the “fractions” wherein they divide Believers.

  14. Gary Marks says:

    One problem with religious surveys is that self-categorization will always yield anomalies that some researchers interpret as ignorance on the part of the survey respondents about their own faith. That said, I still think self-categorization is the best way for us to proceed with “the project.”

    I probably shouldn’t be telling you this, but we’re making RFID tags for all American citizens, for subdermal implantation in the not too distant future. We really do want to put everyone in the correct “faith category” that matches their beliefs. When you’re contacted, it’ll be a lot better for everyone if you cooperate fully, and don’t make any sudden moves ;-)

  15. Joshua says:

    12: I agree. You shouldn’t need the excuse of rules from a deity to act moral and good. It shouldn’t be hard to realize what is right or wrong. Humans are such strange animals. I sometimes take a step back after reading the news and just say out loud, “Silly humans.”

  16. Mr. H. Fusion says:

    #15, joshua, yes, I feel that way everyday when I look out upon the face of the world. How could the Plan go so awry.

  17. Mr. H. Fusion says:

    Another problem with self diagnosis is the inbuilt bias. Many people will state they are a member of XYZ Church, yet haven’t even been inside a church since the last wedding they attended.

    I don’t know if it would be a better metric, but counting the number of attendees could give a different picture of the true state of religions in America.

  18. Ida Know says:

    What I don’t understand about this is the ACLU doing filing a suit on behalf of this group? Aren’t they the ones that are usually against the religious groups? Aren’t they the ones that try to get religious symbols removed and religious (especially Christian) groups shut down? What am I missing here?

  19. Gary Marks says:

    #17 Another problem with self diagnosis is the inbuilt bias.

    Mr. Fusion I like your term “self diagnosis” much better than my use of “self categorization.” Your phrase makes all the right implications ;-)

    As for this survey, I belong to a sect believing that telephones should never be answered before the 17th ring. We have a lot of members in our church, but I see we’re not even mentioned in this survey. I also see that the Amish were passed over as well.

  20. Smartalix says:

    What am I missing here?

    You, and many others, miss that the ACLU defends EVERYONE. If you have a constitutional freedom issue, whatever your stripe, they will help defend you.



Bad Behavior has blocked 23677 access attempts in the last 7 days.