Polish Porn Queen Teresa Orlowski
Today’s headlines are shouting RAPE IN DECLINE! Official figures just released show a plunge in the number of rapes per capita in the United States since the 1970s. Even when measured in different ways, including police reports and survey interviews, the results are in agreement: there has been an 85% reduction in sexual violence in the past 25 years.
[...]
Official explanations for the unexpected decline include (1) less lawlessness associated with crack cocaine; (b) women have been taught to avoid unsafe situations; (c) more would-be rapists already in prison for other crimes; (d) sex education classes telling boys that “no means no.” But these minor factors cannot begin to explain such a sharp decline in the incidence of rape.There is, however, one social factor that correlates almost exactly with the rape statitistics. The American public is probably not ready to believe it. My theory is that the sharp rise in access to pornography accounts for the decline in rape. The correlation is inverse: the more pornography, the less rape. It is like the inverse correlation: the more police officers on the street, the less crime.
Yeah and it’s a conspiracy run for the hills! because the rapists are in on it! OH PLEASE!!!
Yeah I have studied for years too. I have degrees in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, Physics, and Art History, BLA BLA BLA It doesn’t mean shit!
Just because you studied it doesn’t mean you understand it! Is your study peer reviewed? Unfortunately for you most of the research involving rape is peer reviewed. You know to get feedback and point out errors in the research. Unless of course they are all part of it and only agree because it is the PC thing to do.
I guess your study is more reliable than PhD research.
Your understanding of Zoology is not the end all of evidence. Did you ever think that your bias is clouding your view?
Before you pass judgment on what is in the book and how she conducted her research……..Shouldn’t you read it first? A good science student would!
If you work in the field of science using the methodology displayed in your posts I sure hope there is someone who has oversight.
Holy craperino. You really are insane. And maybe just a tad angry in your life? Maybe associated with certain power issues? See, look at me, I took a pyschology class too. You really sucked me in there. I bare my fragile little soul and find it smeared with self-important PC doo-doo. I salute you.
Yeah, I’m pretty sure sexual evolution has been peer reviewed. I’m pretty sure dangerously worked-up, weak-willed, completely selfish, moose-rutting individuals looking for all-consuming gratification has been peer-reviewed. Not to mention the sexual political movement. The one that is in complete denial about the fact that men eat, sleep and poop sex. Yes, how could that situation ever lead to abuse by a minority of people?
I’ll let you read all that literature first, I’m a bit busy.
RBG
“You really are insane”
That is slander but I forgive you. I like toying with the feeble minded.
“And maybe just a tad angry in your life?And maybe just a tad angry in your life? Maybe associated with certain power issues?”
Nope I am quite happy. I am a philanthropist. I enjoy helping others. How about you?
Power issues? Yeah. I have a few. It comes with the territory but they aren’t against women that’s for sure. They mostley deal with the tv remote.
Your second paragraph is the one that is really good. What you don’t realize is it show your true lack of understanding. Which make me doubt your claims of an education in science.
Sexual evolution nor any of the other topics you brought up has not been peer reviewed. Where as some research on sexual evolution has been peer reviewed. Do you see the difference. You cant peer review a topic. You can only peer review research.
You on the other hand do not quote or present any of that research you just quote your own view that are without any credible foundation other than what you say you know. Research has evidence. Evidence can be questioned and tested.
What you present is your perspective on what you think you learned as a student which is clearly governed by a bias against an entire field of science that has evidence that disproves your belief.
“I’ll let you read all that literature first, I’m a bit busy”
I have read the book. Why else would I recommend it?
I on the other hand have lots of free time to do as I wish ………The benefits of having a good education.! Sorry your lot in life has left you the way it has.
I suppose now you’re going to tell me the rest of the argument in that same paragraph hasn’t been peer reviewed either.
Sexual reproduction has been around for approx. 3 billion years. (Bernstein H et al., Am Nat 1981) http://www.dorak.info/evolution/sreprod.html
I had it in the post that got cut. There are plenty of peer reviewed research and conclusions supporting evolution and sexual evolution specifically. Your comment is pure sophistry and idle verbosity. ie: Give me a break.
Now let’s see how you put your education and philanthropy to use. Certainly not in your ideas. I’ve explicitly stated my case. So far, out of all your copious written diarrhea you’ve not given one stingy line how or why rape is the product of power. Did I miss something here?
So let me help you get started, because I am a generous guy too. Now as I understand the party line, men rape for reasons of power over women. They specifically choose rape because, out of the long list they can choose from, it is the most degrading humiliation that they can bestow. And that in turn makes them feel good. Am I close? You can do it. Give.
Aside the fact that this scenario seems to be so very sexist and stereotypical in our very PC and equal-ability society, it surely doesn’t explain – if the object is power – why hoards of radical feminists aren’t attempting to humiliate men in similar or in even more creatively digusting ways. Surely women are just as capable of wanting raw power. Surely women are just as capable of forcing power-giving humiliation upon others including their own sex – and in the same numbers as men. Or maybe women are concerned the men will like it? Or maybe women are just really, really nice. And power is such a man thing. It doesn’t even pass the smell test, less peer review.
And slander only applies if it can’t be proven to be true. ;^)
RBG
And, I don’t care what you think, I have to state the obvious again and say there is nothing funny about rape in spite of what might like to be read into my comments.
RBG
You really don’t get it do you?
“I had it in the post that got cut. There are plenty of peer reviewed research and conclusions supporting evolution and sexual evolution specifically”
I am not disputing sexual evolution so get off of it!!! I am disputing the connection that you make to rape. I won’t argue that there is plenty of peer reviewed research on sexual evolution I never did disagree with that.
“Sexual reproduction has been around for approx. 3 billion years. (Bernstein H et al., Am Nat 1981) ”
That is your evidence that rape is about sex? Where in that document does it even come close to saying that? Oh I see I have to put on your glasses to see it.
“Now let’s see how you put your education and philanthropy to use” Is there a cause you would like me to donate too? lol
“I’ve explicitly stated my case.” Yes you have! Good for you! You just haven’t given any proof!
“I understand the party line” Is that a toll call? lol
“They specifically choose rape because, out of the long list they can choose from, it is the most degrading humiliation that they can bestow. And that in turn makes them feel good Am I close? ”
You should read the book. The rapists are really the best people to ask.
“it surely doesn’t explain – if the object is power – why hoards of radical feminists aren’t attempting to humiliate men in similar or in even more creatively digusting ways. ”
From the “Daily Olympian” Sunday, June 29, 1997 – Section C page 3
The first woman in Spokane County to be convicted of raping a man could face up to 30 years in prison. A seven-woman; five-man Superior Court jury on Friday found Theresa S. guilty of first-degree rape and second degree assault. Theresa S., 36, was accused of torturing the 42 year old man at her east Spokane apartment from September to January. The victim was punched, chained, burned, raped, and threatened with a knife. He finally escaped and called police on January 17.
NEED I GO ON?
Actually, I can’t because it would get clipped like your endless post.
[editor: And you have. This area is for comments, not articles. Post articles on your own website]
No more ultra long postings. This area is for comments, not feature length articles. If you want to post articles, do so on your own website and post a link to it.
Sorry Uncle Dave
I got away with myself but you really edited that in a strange way.
RBG
I went and looked this up for you. It has many cases of women and young girls committing rape.
http://tinyurl.com/ofjxh
It seems to me you clearly have issues with women. Don’t attempt to use your distorted, ill informed view of science to back up your argument. It is insulting for those of us that are scientists.
It is people like you that give science a bad name. You spout nonsense and claim science defends you and provide NO proof. PLEASE STOP It is insulting!
I find your argument lacking in intellect therefore tiresome for me. I retire from this debate because you refuse to provide evidence that backs up your argument. Your opinion is not evidence. Your understanding of science is not evidence.
Got it clear, Uncle Dave. And this will be my last post on the subject. Thanks for your patience.
In statitistics, your example is called an “outlier.” (The word sounds especially appropriate here if you break it down.) I read the same thing, reported because it was so odd. No one has any doubt there are examples to be found about anything. Is it general? Hardly.
Let me leave you with a thought maybe we both can agree on, that if you are completely right and I am completely, utterly wrong; someone has done a terrible disservice in getting its convincing message out.
Cheers,
RBG
Once again you show your lack of understanding.
The definition for an outliner is subjective
It takes into account specific experimental paradigms and general research experience in the respective area. None of which you demonstrate.
You forget I have a PhD in mathematics.
Wait! Did you go to the link or are you basing that on the one example I put in my post? Maybe you should go to the link. it is hardly an “outliner” judging by the number of cases.
“someone has done a terrible disservice in getting its convincing message out.”
They have put the message out you just haven’t been listening! You have been busy convincing yourself you are right based on your bias.
Oh and you are wrong! LOL
Here endith the lesson!
It’s actually called an “outlier”. The concept is nevertheless valid and used, especially with respect to the point I made: general case vs rare if you plotted all rapes on a graph. Way out on that end would you find all the female-dominant rapes. They are extremely rare. Extraordinary like man-on-animal “power” encounters, I’m sure far more so. They sure appear not to be a public concern. No amount of mathematical knowledge or wishful thinking can dance around that.
And I’ll even say you’re right if it will stop this thing.
Signed,
Someone who is not really RBG
Oh you got me there I allowed my spell check to correct a misspelling and it used the wrong word. Zing! lol
I could list many words you have misspelled in your posts but I chalk it up to……..IT IS A BLOG!
That doesn’t change the fact that you don’t understand the concept of how an outlier applies.
ONCE AGAIN
“It takes into account specific experimental paradigms and general research experience in the respective area.”
It isn’t just about collecting data and ignoring anomalies. Was my sentence too confusing for you? or, did you just decide to go with what you believe instead of what is a fact!?
It applies to a single observation. Not a huge group of observations. Anyone who would disregard a large set of anomalies would be practicing poor science.
“And I’ll even say you’re right if it will stop this thing.”
Show me the evidence! Not your interpretation of what you think you learned. “The first sign of an un-provable case is to resign with contempt.” GUESS WHO SAID THAT!
“Signed,
Someone who is not really RBG”
Was you other personality typing before?
When I was writing the first draft of BLUES DELUXE, I got to talking with a con man & criminal who had spent a couple of years in various jails & prisons. He had some great stories to tell about his time behind bars. In fact, his tales were so good that they changed the direction of my novel.
I’m sure I was getting some exaggeration, because the guy was a great storyteller, but it was also clear that there was a large element of Truth to what he was telling me. One of the things he said that stuck with me, was that when the guards would crack down on pornography and drugs, that violence and assaults and rapes and riots always increased. But that when the guards would relax the restrictions, and let the baddies have their Bondage Babe porn & heroin & whatever, that everything quieted right down behind bars, and the boys behaved themselves.
One of McLuhan’s main points was that Media Are Tranquilizers. That when you watch TV, the minor effect on you is the content of the show, the major effect on you is that you sit there for hours drinking beer & eating chips. Effectively, you are tranquilized. Similarly, with porn; the major effect is that you sit there and jerk off. hg47
#93 Harvey Griffin, that is certainly a relevant comment and seems to confirm the original paper.
But, your comment seems bring up another question.
Is sedating a prison population a form of rehabilitation, or does it perpetuate a criminal’s inability to cope?