Comments on: Fox parent cancels O.J. Simpson interview, book — Where’s the Money? http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/ General interest observations and true web-log. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:46:40 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: daddy http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-377228 daddy Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:42:11 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-377228 Speaking hypothetically of course, somebody needs to take action on this mother fucker. Where are the extremists when we actually need one. This mother fucker is making a fuckin' mockery of our legal system. One of the fundamental aspects of our society. He's a fuckin' killer, everybody knows it, and he's walking around free. If that's not enough, now he's shovin' that shit into the faces of the victim's families and the rest of the nation. It is damn well time a vigilante steps up and takes care of this shit. All we need is one good crazy mother fuckin ex-marine style mother fucker. In my opinion the best way to hypothetically do it would be public execution style assassination. Find out where this fucker plays golf. Find a clear line of site to one of the driving areas. Wait for him to tee up. And take his fuck ass out with a high powered sniper rifle. It will take the police at least twenty minutes to figure what direction the shot came from. And that's if our ex-marine isn't using a silencer. Plenty of time to escape. And as far as prosecution goes. I think the entire country has a motive for killing his ass right now. So if he got out of killing two people when he was basically caught red handed, I think our man could get off as well, if he's caught. I am hypothetically begging for someone to stand up and take action on this man. I think it would be a patriotic act. Don't let this man continue to mock our society so openly. I'd stand up and do it myself, but I have neither the proper training nor the nerve for this sort of job. But someone out there does. And I hypothetically hope that someone does. Daddy Speaking hypothetically of course, somebody needs to take action on this mother fucker. Where are the extremists when we actually need one. This mother fucker is making a fuckin’ mockery of our legal system. One of the fundamental aspects of our society. He’s a fuckin’ killer, everybody knows it, and he’s walking around free. If that’s not enough, now he’s shovin’ that shit into the faces of the victim’s families and the rest of the nation.

It is damn well time a vigilante steps up and takes care of this shit. All we need is one good crazy mother fuckin ex-marine style mother fucker.

In my opinion the best way to hypothetically do it would be public execution style assassination. Find out where this fucker plays golf. Find a clear line of site to one of the driving areas. Wait for him to tee up. And take his fuck ass out with a high powered sniper rifle. It will take the police at least twenty minutes to figure what direction the shot came from. And that’s if our ex-marine isn’t using a silencer. Plenty of time to escape.

And as far as prosecution goes. I think the entire country has a motive for killing his ass right now. So if he got out of killing two people when he was basically caught red handed, I think our man could get off as well, if he’s caught.

I am hypothetically begging for someone to stand up and take action on this man. I think it would be a patriotic act. Don’t let this man continue to mock our society so openly.

I’d stand up and do it myself, but I have neither the proper training nor the nerve for this sort of job. But someone out there does.

And I hypothetically hope that someone does.

Daddy

]]> By: James Hill http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-375284 James Hill Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:24:34 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-375284 Pretty neat trick how Fox News gets all sort of good non-partisan press during sweeps by standing up to this and all Fox did was not air one show. Good thing the liberals didn't notice, too. Pretty neat trick how Fox News gets all sort of good non-partisan press during sweeps by standing up to this and all Fox did was not air one show.

Good thing the liberals didn’t notice, too.

]]> By: @$tr0Gh0$t http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374731 @$tr0Gh0$t Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:09:45 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374731 I wonder if a network like Al-Jazeera would air something like this. I wonder if a network like Al-Jazeera would air something like this.

]]> By: ChrisMac http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374473 ChrisMac Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:34:56 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374473 All I got (and still get) from this whole OJ thing is.. What happens in Cali is none of my business.... Florida too All I got (and still get) from this whole OJ thing is..

What happens in Cali is none of my business….
Florida too

]]> By: John Henri Allyn http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374463 John Henri Allyn Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:24:27 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374463 Here is the legal definition in case Fusion confused ya http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d075.htm Here is the legal definition in case Fusion confused ya

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d075.htm

]]> By: Mr. Fusion http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374438 Mr. Fusion Tue, 21 Nov 2006 04:03:27 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374438 #23, you are correct that a new trial <i>may</i> be granted or that you <i>may</i> be tried more then once for the same crime. Not as you outlined though. In the US, once you have been found Not Guilty of a crime, you may not be tried again of an offense under the same circumstance with the same evidence. There are two exceptions though. For example, if you are found not guilty of shooting your neighbor, then you can't be later charged with discharging the gun if the evidence was used in the first trial. First, if the first trial was tainted then a new trial may be granted. That means if a juror was convinced to vote a certain way or a Judge was bribed, there would be a mistrial. Of if evidence or testimony was obviously perjured then it could also mean a new trial. Second is the difference between the Federal and state courts. For example, there were cases during the Civil Rights days where offenders were let off in state courts but later found guilty in Federal courts on the same evidence. The reverse is also possible. #23, you are correct that a new trial may be granted or that you may be tried more then once for the same crime. Not as you outlined though. In the US, once you have been found Not Guilty of a crime, you may not be tried again of an offense under the same circumstance with the same evidence. There are two exceptions though. For example, if you are found not guilty of shooting your neighbor, then you can’t be later charged with discharging the gun if the evidence was used in the first trial.

First, if the first trial was tainted then a new trial may be granted. That means if a juror was convinced to vote a certain way or a Judge was bribed, there would be a mistrial. Of if evidence or testimony was obviously perjured then it could also mean a new trial.

Second is the difference between the Federal and state courts. For example, there were cases during the Civil Rights days where offenders were let off in state courts but later found guilty in Federal courts on the same evidence. The reverse is also possible.

]]> By: Gregory http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374336 Gregory Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:58:53 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374336 <em>The US Constitution forbids double jeopardy. In other words, once you’re found not guilty, you can never be charged on the same or the same underlying charge again by the same governmental agency.</em> Actually that's wrong, and a common misconception. You can be tried again <strong>if there is new evidence</strong> to support the accusation. However it better be some damn good evidence, because otherwise the case will be dismissed damn quick. The US Constitution forbids double jeopardy. In other words, once you’re found not guilty, you can never be charged on the same or the same underlying charge again by the same governmental agency.

Actually that’s wrong, and a common misconception. You can be tried again if there is new evidence to support the accusation.

However it better be some damn good evidence, because otherwise the case will be dismissed damn quick.

]]> By: kballweg http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374319 kballweg Tue, 21 Nov 2006 02:43:59 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374319 All this pontificating aside, I still wonder what his kids think of all this. Seriously. All this pontificating aside, I still wonder what his kids think of all this. Seriously.

]]> By: John Henri Allyn http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374224 John Henri Allyn Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:45:13 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374224 Check the last o.j blog post and say that again 19. I don't particularly care about stirring your memory nor your mental acumen assessment. If he can rant and rave a few times so can I . :) I do apologize for the personal nature of the post though Ascii, just wish you would think the whole "Everything was tained and he was framed" argument. Check the last o.j blog post and say that again 19. I don’t particularly care about stirring your memory nor your mental acumen assessment.

If he can rant and rave a few times so can I .

:)

I do apologize for the personal nature of the post though Ascii, just wish you would think the whole “Everything was tained and he was framed” argument.

]]> By: RBG http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374223 RBG Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:44:51 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374223 19. I stand corrected. We’re supposed to acquiesce to the spirit of a trial finding OJ not guilty because it is the right thing to do. RBG 19. I stand corrected.

We’re supposed to acquiesce to the spirit of a trial finding OJ not guilty because it is the right thing to do.

RBG

]]> By: Mr. Fusion http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374208 Mr. Fusion Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:30:53 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374208 #18, I have tangled with Ascii several times from the other side. His opinions are always thought out and rational even if I don't agree. Then, looking at your posts I don't ever recall any post with thought behind it. You're ranting, ...<i>a message for you and your psycho bitch Judith Reagan……. </i> shows the level of intelligence you bring to the debate. #14, RBG, BTW, There is no finding of “innocence” in a criminal trial. You are either guilty or not guilty. Being not guilty, while implying innocence, is not absolute and really means there was not enough evidence to convict. As many here think, OJ might be not guilty, but they don't believe he is innocent. #18,
I have tangled with Ascii several times from the other side. His opinions are always thought out and rational even if I don’t agree. Then, looking at your posts I don’t ever recall any post with thought behind it. You’re ranting,
…a message for you and your psycho bitch Judith Reagan……. shows the level of intelligence you bring to the debate.

#14, RBG,
BTW, There is no finding of “innocence” in a criminal trial. You are either guilty or not guilty. Being not guilty, while implying innocence, is not absolute and really means there was not enough evidence to convict. As many here think, OJ might be not guilty, but they don’t believe he is innocent.

]]> By: John Henri Allyn http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374188 John Henri Allyn Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:11:53 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374188 Quick Ascii get in here and rant and rave about how everything is tainted and make massive generalizations and offer no support for your statements! Bwahahahaha Quick Ascii get in here and rant and rave about how everything is tainted and make massive generalizations and offer no support for your statements!

Bwahahahaha

]]> By: John Henri Allyn http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374181 John Henri Allyn Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:03:20 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374181 Congratulations O.J, we the American people have a message for you and your psycho bitch Judith Reagan....... Go home and die. Congratulations O.J, we the American people have a message for you and your psycho bitch Judith Reagan…….

Go home and die.

]]> By: MisterRustic http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374103 MisterRustic Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:59:43 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374103 OJ causes Global Warming. OJ causes Global Warming.

]]> By: rctaylor http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2006/11/20/fox-parent-cancels-oj-simpson-interview-book-wheres-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-374098 rctaylor Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:57:51 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=8092#comment-374098 I can guarantee this advance was sheltered so none of it could be attached by previous judgments. It would be pointless to accept it otherwise. Only in LA could you be allowed to sit enough nut jobs on a jury to acquit this SOB. I can guarantee this advance was sheltered so none of it could be attached by previous judgments. It would be pointless to accept it otherwise. Only in LA could you be allowed to sit enough nut jobs on a jury to acquit this SOB.

]]>