
Video Is a Window Into a Terror Suspect’s Isolation”>
One spring day during his three and a half years as an enemy combatant, Jose Padilla experienced a break from the monotony of his solitary confinement in a bare cell in the brig at the Naval Weapons Station in Charleston, S.C. That day, Mr. Padilla, a Brooklyn-born Muslim convert whom the Bush administration had accused of plotting a dirty bomb attack and had detained without charges, got to go to the dentist.
“Today is May 21,” a naval official declared to a camera videotaping the event. “Right now we’re ready to do a root canal treatment on Jose Padilla, our enemy combatant.”
Several guards in camouflage and riot gear approached cell No. 103. They unlocked a rectangular panel at the bottom of the door and Mr. Padilla’s bare feet slid through, eerily disembodied. As one guard held down a foot with his black boot, the others shackled Mr. Padilla’s legs. Next, his hands emerged through another hole to be manacled.
Wordlessly, the guards, pushing into the cell, chained Mr. Padilla’s cuffed hands to a metal belt. Briefly, his expressionless eyes met the camera before he lowered his head submissively in expectation of what came next: noise-blocking headphones over his ears and blacked-out goggles over his eyes. Then the guards, whose faces were hidden behind plastic visors, marched their masked, clanking prisoner down the hall to his root canal.
Now lawyers for Mr. Padilla, 36, suggest that he is unfit to stand trial. They argue that he has been so damaged by his interrogations and prolonged isolation that he suffers post-traumatic stress disorder and is unable to assist in his own defense. His interrogations, they say, included hooding, stress positions, assaults, threats of imminent execution and the administration of “truth serums.”
In his affidavit, Mr. Patel said, “I was told by members of the brig staff that Mr. Padilla’s temperament was so docile and inactive that his behavior was like that of ‘a piece of furniture.’ ”












#10, #3
The question is not whether the person responsible should be punished. The question has always been whether they got the right guy. Where is the evidence that supports the claim that Padilla did what he said he did? The core issue is that this US citizen was denied his Constitutional rights requiring his accusers to establish the veracity of their claim in a court of law. How many times have the police been caught making up evidence? How many times have the police mistakenly gotten the wrong guy? Look at the case of the Duke lacrosse kids. Even after DNA evidence established that they did not rape that girl, the government still wanted to put them away.
I didn’t read all the comments.
Basically I’m sick and fucking tired of a country that STARTS A FUCKING WAR, then justifies torture, loss of freedoms etc by citing THAT VERY SAME WAR.
YOU STARTED (OR BUSH ADMIN DID)THE FUCKING WAR. DO YOU NOT SEE THE HYPOCRISY IN USING THAT VERY SAME WAR TO JUSTIFY THE GOVT ACTION.
Personnally I think the US has lost it’s way, corporate greed has taken over your country and is affecting your policies. The current situation is going to take decades to repair. You can not kill someones family, call it “collateral damage” and not expect them to respond now or in the future.
Individually I’ve found Americans to be pleasant, but your(current) govt is a hateful greedy beast eerily similar to the puritans that helped settle America. Which is not a good thing.
All I can say is Good Luck, you’ll need it
Muhammad Ali once beat up his opponent for calling him Cassius Clay. Why do you all keep saying Jose Padilla? His name is Abdullah al-Muhajir.