hillarywatch logo

Clinton adds staff, continues outreach on likely presidential bid — This should be an amusing two years.

WASHINGTON Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has begun reaching out to Democratic activists in New Hampshire as she prepares for her likely presidential bid.
Clinton has been calling Democratic activists in New Hampshire, including Governor John Lynch.

She’s also added several top staff members, including Karen Hicks, a veteran field organizer who served as New Hampshire director for Howard Dean’s 2004 campaign. Hicks will be Clinton’s national field director.



  1. ECA says:

    I REALLY wouldnt want to follow bush.
    For all he has done, many things wont come to fruitation until AFTER he is gone.
    Many presidents have seen this happen to them. What was done before takes years to have an impact, and then you are STUCK with it.

  2. Anonymous says:
  3. KB says:

    Hicks says Clinton is calling people to get advice on what her campaign should look like, if she runs.

    Not like this, hopefully….

  4. Andy Cactus says:

    #3 Where did you get that picture of Dvorak? I have never seen him with so much hair!

  5. Dallas says:

    Go Hillary ! I’ll vote for her unless Barak Obama goes for it.

    #3 That’s a degrading picture of Hillary above. Ouch. Mission accomplished.

  6. Proud Alien says:

    Just don’t do it! As much as I like the idea of a woman for President, Hilary is not the one I would vote for. She’s just not likable!

  7. JulieB says:

    I like her, but too many people hate her. If she gets the nomination she will be handing the republicans the white house. Only Barak Obama can save us.

  8. JimJammer says:

    I agree – Barak Obama is a once in a generation politician – he can undo all the harm Bush’s senior and junior have done to America’s reputation and credibility.

  9. Mucous says:

    Obama’s scary but It would be better for all life on Earth to end that Hillary get in.

  10. RTaylor says:

    Now is the time to build the war chest, and the Clintons are good at that. As long as she behaves, having money to burn more than anything will determine the early primaries. In the general election I think the country is too polarized to elect her, though it’s a long while off and a lot can happen.

  11. GregA says:

    As it looks right now, the only viable person the Republicans have is the manchurian candidate, and even he is at odds with most of America on most of the issues. So Hillary will be president not so much because she is a good candidate, but because the Republicans wont be able to even field a legitimate national candidate. Also given the Blueward shift of Arizona in the last few years, it is doubtful that the manchurian candidate can even win his home state.

    My other prediction is, Bush doesn’t get to speak at the Republican convention.

  12. Arbo Cide says:

    There seem to be too many warmongers among the frontrunners. I don’t mean like Pres Bush either. Hillary and McCain have a control freak nanny-state mentality. I can see any of them just getting angry and starting wars. McCain would have invaded Rwanda for sure, and would invade Sudan and probably reinvade Somalia as well as Iran if he could get the support . HIllary would probably invade any country that doesn’t sign on to her true universal health care agenda or because they aren’t wearing their seat belts. Giuliani isn’t as bad, but he is on the pro-war side and was known for grandstanding as a prosecutor, taking people on Wall Street off in handcuffs. His bogus imprisonment of Michael Milken makes me think he would make up cases for war as well.

  13. DBR says:

    Ferget Hils and Barak (Barak? What kind of name is that?
    Sounds like an ambassador from one of the Star Trek
    spinoffs), we need a fat-assed, overly opinionated
    IT parasite in the White House. Now. Let’s draw lots!

  14. Mucous says:

    I love it how people think it’s possible to get by in this world without wars.

    One thing I look for in a candidate is someone I can trust to actually bomb someone who needs it.

  15. Improbus says:

    Hillary may be the darling of the Democrats but she can not win a presidential election (to much baggage). I couldn’t stand her husband and that goes double for her. What we need is a smart and boring president. What is Al doing?

  16. SN says:

    14. “I love it how people think it’s possible to get by in this world without wars.”

    I had no idea that Sweden was violating some sort of physical law. How have they managed to do the impossible for so long?!

  17. ken says:

    republicans on this list should be supporting run for hillary — it’s the very best way to guarantee at least four more years of republican rule in the white house.

    my guess at numbers would be that she too left for 100% of the republican party and about 33% of the democratic party

    republicans won’t even have to rig the voting machines!

  18. Roc Rizzo says:

    Clinton/Obama in 2008!

  19. Mr. Fusion says:

    Hillary may well have burned out by 2008. Obama may also have worn out his welcome. The only way the two of them could avoid this would be by astute handling and no gaffes. Unfortunately, that would also tarnish much of the needed “rebel with a cause” they will need to win the nomination. My own very early prediction would be for a Clinton / Byah ticket against the both adulterously divorced, pro abortion McCain / Gulliani for the Republicans.

    My bigger question is why the hate for Clinton. Is it just because by screaming insults at her, the Republicans are deflecting people’s attention from their own screw-ups? Universal health care is a worse issue then 42 million Americans with NO health coverage?

  20. GregA says:

    But for the manchurian candidate, all the possible republican candidates have had to many wives to gain the support of the pro-marriage base of the republican party. Also Giuliani is bi-sexual, so im thinkin that just disqualifies him outright.



Bad Behavior has blocked 23817 access attempts in the last 7 days.