<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia to phase out traditional light bulbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-2/#comment-488702</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-488702</guid>
		<description>23,

I do believe there will be a long transition period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23,</p>
<p>I do believe there will be a long transition period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-2/#comment-488591</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-488591</guid>
		<description>I count 26 CFL, 15 40w tubes and about 35 incandescents at home.

Why? CFL don&#039;t work in dimmer circuits. They&#039;re light is often harsh. Floodlight versions are too expensive and burn out too fast. I think the heat buildup in conical fixtures is too much.

They&#039;re okay for hallways, kitchen, bath, garages and utility areas. They stink in most bedroom, livingroom and dining areas (unless you like to feel like you&#039;re in some cheap cafeteria while you eat.) 

So why I like to save money a mixture of the two seems more reasonable for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I count 26 CFL, 15 40w tubes and about 35 incandescents at home.</p>
<p>Why? CFL don&#8217;t work in dimmer circuits. They&#8217;re light is often harsh. Floodlight versions are too expensive and burn out too fast. I think the heat buildup in conical fixtures is too much.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re okay for hallways, kitchen, bath, garages and utility areas. They stink in most bedroom, livingroom and dining areas (unless you like to feel like you&#8217;re in some cheap cafeteria while you eat.) </p>
<p>So why I like to save money a mixture of the two seems more reasonable for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fik</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-2/#comment-488483</link>
		<dc:creator>Fik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-488483</guid>
		<description>Here in Venezuela our government is replacing free of charge incandescents for CFs (incidentally giving our hills a nice yellow and blue sparkle at night).
Problem is, the government insists to install the bulbs themselves, instead of simply distributing them; which rises suspicions when one takes into account the proposed laws intended to expropiate houses deemed &quot;too big&quot; for its owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Venezuela our government is replacing free of charge incandescents for CFs (incidentally giving our hills a nice yellow and blue sparkle at night).<br />
Problem is, the government insists to install the bulbs themselves, instead of simply distributing them; which rises suspicions when one takes into account the proposed laws intended to expropiate houses deemed &#8220;too big&#8221; for its owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-2/#comment-488088</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-488088</guid>
		<description>Generaly, I do see much longer life in the CF&#039;s in my house, as opposed to the incandesents.  
I have one 60 watt incandescent bulb which has one on the life extenders stuck to it which has been running about 12 hours a day for 4 years.  These life extenders are a diode which sticks to the bottom of the bulb, and cuts the  amount of electricity in half (have wave AC).  The bulb is dimmer of course.
My problem with this legistation is about possible exceptions like, photographers, people who are made ill by flourescent life, automotive bulbs and such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generaly, I do see much longer life in the CF&#8217;s in my house, as opposed to the incandesents.<br />
I have one 60 watt incandescent bulb which has one on the life extenders stuck to it which has been running about 12 hours a day for 4 years.  These life extenders are a diode which sticks to the bottom of the bulb, and cuts the  amount of electricity in half (have wave AC).  The bulb is dimmer of course.<br />
My problem with this legistation is about possible exceptions like, photographers, people who are made ill by flourescent life, automotive bulbs and such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeN</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-488024</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-488024</guid>
		<description>Why are they mandating anything?
What if in two years someone develops a light bulb that uses 10% of the energy of these new bulbs.  This won&#039;t get adopted because every has spent money on these 10-year bulbs.  
This looks to me like the equivalent of JDs calls for government broadband for everyone.  If we had heeded his advice, right now there&#039;d be 802.11a across the country, rival networks would be banned, and you would still be paying money for access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are they mandating anything?<br />
What if in two years someone develops a light bulb that uses 10% of the energy of these new bulbs.  This won&#8217;t get adopted because every has spent money on these 10-year bulbs.<br />
This looks to me like the equivalent of JDs calls for government broadband for everyone.  If we had heeded his advice, right now there&#8217;d be 802.11a across the country, rival networks would be banned, and you would still be paying money for access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487385</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487385</guid>
		<description>14,

There are sadly significant differences in quality between the latest Osram Sylvania CFL and Happy-Go Lamp Production products. I would love to see a quality complaint about a name-brand CFL. I&#039;ll even forward the comments to the right people for you personally. 

As with anything, the quality of a CFL is directly related to who makes it and how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14,</p>
<p>There are sadly significant differences in quality between the latest Osram Sylvania CFL and Happy-Go Lamp Production products. I would love to see a quality complaint about a name-brand CFL. I&#8217;ll even forward the comments to the right people for you personally. </p>
<p>As with anything, the quality of a CFL is directly related to who makes it and how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonStatist</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487355</link>
		<dc:creator>nonStatist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 04:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487355</guid>
		<description>This is dumb beyond all means of measure. The nanny statists are at it again. There is no rational reason for this based on rights, therefore the law is unethical. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is dumb beyond all means of measure. The nanny statists are at it again. There is no rational reason for this based on rights, therefore the law is unethical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487326</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487326</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I simply HATE the light thrown off by the CFs I have bought.  I have become convinced that florescent lighting was developed by our Corporate and Governmental Overlords to break the spirits of cubicle inmates and outsiders who into their domains.

I still use the CFs, but only in combination with incandescents.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I simply HATE the light thrown off by the CFs I have bought.  I have become convinced that florescent lighting was developed by our Corporate and Governmental Overlords to break the spirits of cubicle inmates and outsiders who into their domains.</p>
<p>I still use the CFs, but only in combination with incandescents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487288</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487288</guid>
		<description>I also don&#039;t see the advantages of the CF.  Similar to mike-in-newark&#039;s experience, the CFs I&#039;ve used do not have the lifespan of an incandescent bulb.  I bought a new home 2 years ago, and it had a full complement of incandescent bulbs.  I replace approximately 1/2 of the bulbs (mixing CFs with incandescents on the same circuit).  Guess what?  I&#039;ve had maybe 3 incandescent bulbs burn out.  All of the &quot;bulb shaped&quot; CFs died in a year.  All but 2 (6 of 8) recessed 14w CF flood lights died within 2 years, and about 3/4 of the corkscrew lights have burned out.  I can&#039;t see how I saved any money on these devices given the high initial cost.

I&#039;m sold on saving energy, but CFs don&#039;t work well enough.  I&#039;m going to try out some LED bulbs next.  As mythbusters found, they are the only bulb technology that can stand up to repeated on-off cycles.

How I&#039;m saving money on lighting?  I found some value packs of 8 incandescents at Target on clearance for 34 cents.  I bought 5 packs.  I turn the lights on as I need them and off when I don&#039;t.  At less than a nickel a bulb, it doesn&#039;t matter if I stress them and burn them out sooner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#8217;t see the advantages of the CF.  Similar to mike-in-newark&#8217;s experience, the CFs I&#8217;ve used do not have the lifespan of an incandescent bulb.  I bought a new home 2 years ago, and it had a full complement of incandescent bulbs.  I replace approximately 1/2 of the bulbs (mixing CFs with incandescents on the same circuit).  Guess what?  I&#8217;ve had maybe 3 incandescent bulbs burn out.  All of the &#8220;bulb shaped&#8221; CFs died in a year.  All but 2 (6 of <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> recessed 14w CF flood lights died within 2 years, and about 3/4 of the corkscrew lights have burned out.  I can&#8217;t see how I saved any money on these devices given the high initial cost.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sold on saving energy, but CFs don&#8217;t work well enough.  I&#8217;m going to try out some LED bulbs next.  As mythbusters found, they are the only bulb technology that can stand up to repeated on-off cycles.</p>
<p>How I&#8217;m saving money on lighting?  I found some value packs of 8 incandescents at Target on clearance for 34 cents.  I bought 5 packs.  I turn the lights on as I need them and off when I don&#8217;t.  At less than a nickel a bulb, it doesn&#8217;t matter if I stress them and burn them out sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill R.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487163</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487163</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve recently seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbspot.com/Log/?module=Log&amp;function=browse&amp;id=841&quot; title=&quot;bbpot log&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;images of a CF light where the base of the light had started to melt.&lt;/a&gt;  Between the mercury and the burning, I&#039;m less inclined to purchase these buggers.

The url for the Livermore Pleasanton firehouse is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm&lt;/a&gt;.

B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve recently seen <a href="http://www.bbspot.com/Log/?module=Log&amp;function=browse&amp;id=841" title="bbpot log" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">images of a CF light where the base of the light had started to melt.</a>  Between the mercury and the burning, I&#8217;m less inclined to purchase these buggers.</p>
<p>The url for the Livermore Pleasanton firehouse is <a href="http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm</a>.</p>
<p>B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_in_newark</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487149</link>
		<dc:creator>mike_in_newark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 01:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487149</guid>
		<description>13, Incandescents are durable?

    Actually they can be. There is a lightbulb in a Livemore Firestation which has been on continuously for over 70 years!

While I use some CF lightbulbs at home I have found that they certainly do not live up to their billing, nor do they work well in all applications. For example

1) I have yet to have a CF bulb last for more than a year (even the ones claiming 7 years), and I have kept track.

2) There are certain light sockets (I am not sure of the material) which react to the bottoms of the CF bulbs in a way such that &quot;pitting&quot; occurs on the bottom of the &quot;bulbs&quot; connector and it will no longer make good contact in the socket resulting in the bulb going out. I can rotate this particular &quot;CF&quot; bulb through several other light fixture until it will no lnoger work in any of them. I do not have this kind of problem with incandescents in these fixtures. (I am very interested in understanding what is causing this pitting if anybody knows).

3) CF&#039;s do not work very well for outdoor porchlights as on cold nights they take a while in starting up (taking a lot of energy) as well as achieving their final brightness level.

4) CF&#039;s seem to have more problems in unstable fixtures (like a hanging lamp). I think this is due to vibrations, but it could also be related to problem #2, since several (but not all) of my fixtures with problem #2 are also hanging.

5) CF&#039;s need to be on for a while to start &quot;saving&quot; power. Flouresecent lights (including CF&#039;s) take a lot of power to start up and need to stay on for at least 20 minutes (year 2000 number) before they start saving energy compared to comperable lumen output Incandescent light. This means that these could burn more power than an incandescent if used in say closets or bathrooms (unless you have kids that never turn off the lights or spend forever in the bathroom) since they will be turned &quot;on&quot; and &quot;off&quot; before they can start &quot;saving&quot; energy.

I should point out that power companies (like PG&amp;E) love CF&#039;s, not because they can save power, but because they can be turned off by the power company (without your control). This is because most CF&#039;s use an electronic ballast which by federal law is required to turn off when the line voltage drops beneath a certain voltage (I forget the actual level). In a low voltage situation incandescents will continue to give off light, though much dimmer, hence the term &quot;brown out&quot;. With CF&#039;s there are no &quot;brown outs&quot; (since the ballast is actually PWM circuit), just blackouts.

Using legislative means to force social compliance on any issue is often ill advised because it often ignores the other problems that it creates. This is just like the MBTE fiasco which occured in California (which is also thinking of mandating CF&#039;s), where people using bad science come up with a politically correct idea, which when implemented is both self defeating and destructive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13, Incandescents are durable?</p>
<p>    Actually they can be. There is a lightbulb in a Livemore Firestation which has been on continuously for over 70 years!</p>
<p>While I use some CF lightbulbs at home I have found that they certainly do not live up to their billing, nor do they work well in all applications. For example</p>
<p>1) I have yet to have a CF bulb last for more than a year (even the ones claiming 7 years), and I have kept track.</p>
<p>2) There are certain light sockets (I am not sure of the material) which react to the bottoms of the CF bulbs in a way such that &#8220;pitting&#8221; occurs on the bottom of the &#8220;bulbs&#8221; connector and it will no longer make good contact in the socket resulting in the bulb going out. I can rotate this particular &#8220;CF&#8221; bulb through several other light fixture until it will no lnoger work in any of them. I do not have this kind of problem with incandescents in these fixtures. (I am very interested in understanding what is causing this pitting if anybody knows).</p>
<p>3) CF&#8217;s do not work very well for outdoor porchlights as on cold nights they take a while in starting up (taking a lot of energy) as well as achieving their final brightness level.</p>
<p>4) CF&#8217;s seem to have more problems in unstable fixtures (like a hanging lamp). I think this is due to vibrations, but it could also be related to problem #2, since several (but not all) of my fixtures with problem #2 are also hanging.</p>
<p>5) CF&#8217;s need to be on for a while to start &#8220;saving&#8221; power. Flouresecent lights (including CF&#8217;s) take a lot of power to start up and need to stay on for at least 20 minutes (year 2000 number) before they start saving energy compared to comperable lumen output Incandescent light. This means that these could burn more power than an incandescent if used in say closets or bathrooms (unless you have kids that never turn off the lights or spend forever in the bathroom) since they will be turned &#8220;on&#8221; and &#8220;off&#8221; before they can start &#8220;saving&#8221; energy.</p>
<p>I should point out that power companies (like PG&amp;E) love CF&#8217;s, not because they can save power, but because they can be turned off by the power company (without your control). This is because most CF&#8217;s use an electronic ballast which by federal law is required to turn off when the line voltage drops beneath a certain voltage (I forget the actual level). In a low voltage situation incandescents will continue to give off light, though much dimmer, hence the term &#8220;brown out&#8221;. With CF&#8217;s there are no &#8220;brown outs&#8221; (since the ballast is actually PWM circuit), just blackouts.</p>
<p>Using legislative means to force social compliance on any issue is often ill advised because it often ignores the other problems that it creates. This is just like the MBTE fiasco which occured in California (which is also thinking of mandating CF&#8217;s), where people using bad science come up with a politically correct idea, which when implemented is both self defeating and destructive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smartalix</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-487026</link>
		<dc:creator>Smartalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-487026</guid>
		<description>9,

Incandescents are durable? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9,</p>
<p>Incandescents are durable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BryanP</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-486996</link>
		<dc:creator>BryanP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-486996</guid>
		<description>Why is it some people always look to the government to pass laws?  I swear, nanny state is becoming more and more of a reality.

I think CF bulbs are great.  I&#039;ve put them in all but a few fixtures in my home (there are a few places they&#039;re not suitable).  But you know what?  We don&#039;t need yet another stupid law on the books.  CF bulbs are taking over all by themselves.  Unlike when I first started buying them, they are now quite inexpensive.  That plus their reduced energy and long life is convincing people to buy them.  There is no need for the govt to involve themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it some people always look to the government to pass laws?  I swear, nanny state is becoming more and more of a reality.</p>
<p>I think CF bulbs are great.  I&#8217;ve put them in all but a few fixtures in my home (there are a few places they&#8217;re not suitable).  But you know what?  We don&#8217;t need yet another stupid law on the books.  CF bulbs are taking over all by themselves.  Unlike when I first started buying them, they are now quite inexpensive.  That plus their reduced energy and long life is convincing people to buy them.  There is no need for the govt to involve themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ballookey</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-486987</link>
		<dc:creator>ballookey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-486987</guid>
		<description>First of all, CF bulbs have mercury in them and while it&#039;s not technically illegal to throw them away, you&#039;re supposed to be recycling them. And hardly any place takes them. How big is the energy savings when you have to factor in the drive to a place that will take them? 

Secondly the color of the light is horrific.

Thirdly, the first several hours I had CF bulbs plugged in, they did indeed match the brilliance of the incandescent bulbs they were allegedly replacing. The next day however, they were immediately much dimmer in comparison. 

So for now, I have four of these little toxic disposal nightmares that I keep shuffling around in my closet, waiting for the day I have more closets or garages to light. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, CF bulbs have mercury in them and while it&#8217;s not technically illegal to throw them away, you&#8217;re supposed to be recycling them. And hardly any place takes them. How big is the energy savings when you have to factor in the drive to a place that will take them? </p>
<p>Secondly the color of the light is horrific.</p>
<p>Thirdly, the first several hours I had CF bulbs plugged in, they did indeed match the brilliance of the incandescent bulbs they were allegedly replacing. The next day however, they were immediately much dimmer in comparison. </p>
<p>So for now, I have four of these little toxic disposal nightmares that I keep shuffling around in my closet, waiting for the day I have more closets or garages to light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundog</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/02/20/australia-to-phase-out-traditional-light-bulbs/comment-page-1/#comment-486963</link>
		<dc:creator>Sundog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=9924#comment-486963</guid>
		<description>8. James, you probably wouldnt get off the Titanic if you had had an oppurtunity either, we wouldnt want you to be inconvenienced in any way. See you at the bottom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8. James, you probably wouldnt get off the Titanic if you had had an oppurtunity either, we wouldnt want you to be inconvenienced in any way. See you at the bottom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

