Comments on: Breasts Not Bombs protest — A Grim Sight in San Francisco

By: JoaoPT

JoaoPT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:19:31 +0000

what….

can´t a guy have a bad day?

By: Lauren the Ghoti

Lauren the Ghoti — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:35:12 +0000

[groan]

By: JoaoPT

JoaoPT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:07:00 +0000

Hi Lauren.

#23 continuing… Also they could moon everybody and have the slogan:

“Tush against Bush”

By: Lauren the Ghoti

Lauren the Ghoti — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:21:13 +0000

Exactly, Joao… self-adornment – and status – predates functionality in clothing.

By: JoaoPT

JoaoPT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:57:19 +0000

#24 yeah right…

Clothing is such a powerful symbol, that protection against the elements is the lesser use.
Ever since the first men started wearing hides from killed beasts, the one with the Leopard fur would be the king…

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 13:16:35 +0000

#22, tallwookie,

For protection from the elements and environment. Clothing used for vanity is a modern use and very recent application.

By: JoaoPT

JoaoPT — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:43:39 +0000

Sounds only fitting that if it is boobs against bombs it should be full frontal nudity against BUSH…

By: tallwookie

tallwookie — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:43:20 +0000

#20 – why do you think clothes were invented?

By: pedro

pedro — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:34:25 +0000

#12 yeah but, did they really had to do that? HTF are they making a stronger point by showing up…that?!

I can see myself getting in trouble for opening that page in the office, but I don’t think being labeled as a porn watcher will be my shame.

#20 You call that attention? If they wanted me to join the protest, they lost me when the shirt was about their waist on its way up.

Besides, taking ideas from a sitcom is not really a good way to seek for more people to protest. No Ma’am.

By: RTaylor

RTaylor — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:10:07 +0000

This wasn’t about voyeurism or pornography, it was about getting attention for their cause. They certainly got the attention. I always suspected that if everyone was required to be naked, there would be fewer wars. Hard to concentrate on battle with your delicate bits hanging about.

By: Spilt Milk

Spilt Milk — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:57:52 +0000

I watch all this and simply am glad that there is a president (and first lady) who can rise above it all…

George Bush Chacarron

By: Good

Good — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 08:49:20 +0000

That’s a good thing, what those women are doing. I have mixed feelings on the Iraq thing, but their Parliament/Congress/whatever voted that the USA/UN troops leave. So, now the USA is violating a sovereign entity, and is committing the crimes against humanity now.

As for pretty titties vs. un-pretty titties: they’re all good to me. Besides, if there were a buncha super-hotties wavin’ their knockers around, nobody would be looking at their clever signs…

Oh, and Lindsay Lohan got busted for cocaine now. It’s about time that she, Britney, and Paris take up the “legalize weed” movement. Perhaps they should hire chauffeurs as well, the dumb bitches.

By: John Paradox

John Paradox — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:05:50 +0000

Jugs’ Paradox. The women who are the most enthusiastic about whipping ‘em out in public are the very ones who should never do so.

Works for me

J/P=?

By: Kevitivity

Kevitivity — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:54:57 +0000

As previously mentioned, zombietime has all the gory details.

By: TIHZ_HO

TIHZ_HO — Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:40:23 +0000

Memo to terrorists:

It was typo – it was supposed to be Boobs not Bombs