Ars Technica – 9/19/2007:

consumers in the US are legally allowed to unlock their mobile handsets after the US Register of Copyrights approved an exemption to the DMCA late last year, noting that “The underlying activity sought to be performed by the owner of the handset is to allow the handset to do what it was manufactured to do—lawfully connect to any carrier.” But don’t tell that to Apple and AT&T—unless the government bars them from locking out the unlocks, there’s virtually nothing stopping them from making sure that the unlocks mysteriously stop working.

But we have reason to believe that Apple may go much further than just “breaking” the SIM unlocks that have been released so far. One move that the cat (or is Apple the mouse?) could make in this game would be to permanently and irreparably brick unlocked iPhones when they run this month’s pending software update. It would serve as a warning shot to potential unlockers in the future—even if crafty hackers manage to rewrite their unlock apps to get around the changes made in the update, they could always be at risk of suddenly owning a shiny $400 chunk of metal and plastic.



  1. KagatoAMV says:

    Thats something I’ve been curious about. Is it illegal for Apple to brick an unlocked iPhone? Is Apple under any obligation whatsoever to make sure its future updates don’t “brick” a hacked phone?

    I suppose if you hack your iphone, you’d better be pretty damn careful about making software updates.

  2. lakelady says:

    Why would apple want to do that? Once they’ve sold the phone they’ve made their money. Why should they care if they’re unlocked or not. Turning them into bricks will only hurt their sales, not help them.

  3. Adrian says:

    That would be a very bad move if Apple goes that far.

    Fans unlocking the iPhone hurts AT&T more than it hurts Apple. The ability to unlock the iphone will increase iPhone sales and reflect positively to Apple’s bottom line.

    Don’t do it Apple.. if you know whats good for you.

  4. ethanol says:

    lakelady (#2),
    Why would apple want to do that? Once they’ve sold the phone they’ve made their money. Why should they care if they’re unlocked or not.
    Because they receive $15/month from AT&T for each iPhone user with an AT&T contract.

  5. shih tzu paradise says:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple pushes a software update that disabled unlocked iphones but still allows them to work as ipods.

    Don’t forget, Apple loses $$$ for every one that’s unlocked through loss of shared revenue from AT&T.

    That’s why they chose to lock customers to one provider…a share of the data revenue.

    What a great way to treat loyal customers!

  6. JJ says:

    Come on. I call BS. This is Apple, not Sony.

  7. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #5 – Don’t forget, Apple loses $$$ for every one that’s unlocked through loss of shared revenue from AT&T.

    They don’t “lose” money… They just don’t make more than they already have. To “lose” money, money would actually have to leave Apple.

    I hate it when a company earns 8 million in profit be projected 10 million in profit and portray it as a 2 million dollar loss.

  8. Froggmann says:

    Simply put if apple moves to brick iPhones they stand to lose potential millions of potential iPod, Mac and iVaporware customers. Who are the primary customers here? Kids and the younger generation, if this happens how many will become jaded agaist Apple, for life?

  9. your-name-here says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but does not the current set of DMCA exemptions allow for the unlocking of phones? If Apple bricks an iPhone, could they not possibly be running afoul the DMCA?

  10. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    #9 – Apple is a corporation. The only ones who can break laws in the United States are citizens. Corporations are immune to law.

  11. BlackCat40 says:

    This makes no sense to me. Once you buy hardware isn’t it yours? I know the RIAA has that thing about you don’t really own the music just because you bought the CD but this is different. How would Apple bricking the phone be different then me taking your phone and breaking it. Wouldn’t I owe you a new phone? I’m not trying to be stupid I just don’t see how legally they could make a piece of hardware that you wholly own not work.

  12. pedro says:

    But..but…mac is a good company. They don’t want to gouge their customers. Never!

    #8 No, they count on iSheeps, The were already burned with the price cut and they’re still there. Guess what they’ll do if mac bricks the oy!Phone.

    #11 it maybe yours, but if you want a software update…

  13. Mike Strong says:

    Add to that the raft of charges for software/hardware services. This guy got charged nearly $4,800 in data charges during a trip. The darn thing updates your emails (so friendly) so they will be there when you wake up, and more. But then they charge through the nose.
    http://www.blah3.com/article.php?story=200709080000479

    The following is copied from the page:
    Jay Levy and his family took their iPhones on a Mediterranean cruise. Now the Hewlett Harbor entrepreneur feels as if he got taken for a ride, receiving a 54-page monthly bill of nearly $4,800 from AT&T Wireless.

    While Levy, his wife and his daughter were enjoying the trip, and even while they were sleeping, their three iPhones were racking up a bill for data charges. The iPhone regularly updates e-mail, even while it’s off, so that all the messages will be available when the user turns it on.

    “They have periodic updates on their data files, and they translate into megabucks,” Levy said. “This is akin to your bank having automatic access to your ATM machine and is siphoning money out during all times of the day and night without your knowledge.”

  14. HighQHam says:

    This is Apple, not Microsoft.

    While they might upload firmware that will break some of the current hacks, they wouldn’t do anything that would destroy the iPhone. You might have to reset your firmware and go back to an ATT account, but they are smarter than to turn the iPhone into a brick – I think, I hope?

    Apple is not going to destroy its customer base over a few million dollars. Look at their iPhone rebate.

  15. Colonel Panic says:

    Bwahahahahahahahahahah! Suckers, didnt you have to sign a contract? And now your crying because they wont let you break it? My heart bleeds.

  16. gquaglia says:

    The only ones who can break laws in the United States are citizens. Corporations are immune to law

    Sad but true.

  17. JoaoPT says:

    I don’t think Apple would do such a blunder. Two reasons:
    1 – Very bad publicity. Even though fanboys would say “I deserved it”…
    2 – Bricking a phone would keep them from cashing in those $15 monthly AT&T gives them, and worse, keep AT&T from cashing from your two year contract with them where they expect to charge you a lot more than the cost of the iPhone.

  18. Lavi says:

    That would be sooo funny!!! A shiny Apple Brick.

    You can always trust Apple Design to make a brick look good!!!!!

  19. Angel H. Wong says:

    #17

    They can and they WILL brick the iPhones, then they will charge you a $200 fee to unbrick them.

  20. OhForTheLoveOf says:

    You guys talking about how Apple won’t do this because of publicity are forgetting that we are talking about American consumers here. They bought these dumb ass phones to watch Britney Spears videos and update their myspace accounts with drunken party photos. Do you really think anyone pays attention to nerd news other than nerds?

    We gave up. The US is run by a shadow government, the Corporate States of America, and the population is placated my Lindsey Lohan gossip and other celebrity news.

    We are all just slaves to the American Entertainial/Military Complex. The sheeple will never resist.

    This and other whacky paranoid loonbat rants will appear on my soon to be launched website: http://www.paranoid-loonbats.com



Bad Behavior has blocked 23850 access attempts in the last 7 days.