<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The MPAA wants to make ISPs their bitch and police the interwebitubes, AT&amp;T submits!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axtell</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-2/#comment-799785</link>
		<dc:creator>Axtell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-799785</guid>
		<description>Wow using the AT&amp;T logo as the death star...that&#039;s original.

gizmodo.com has been using that graphic for months now.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow using the AT&amp;T logo as the death star&#8230;that&#8217;s original.</p>
<p>gizmodo.com has been using that graphic for months now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-2/#comment-799549</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-799549</guid>
		<description>I appologize for the duplicate posting. But if you look closely I had to change it a few times, in minor ways. That was because D.U. kept refusing to confirm it. Only after omitting the &quot;standardnewswire&quot; link did it go thru. But then surprise, the earlier to attempts were also recorded. So John going to have to figure out why that happens. Can&#039;t have this &quot;blacklist&quot; notice popping up for no reason.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appologize for the duplicate posting. But if you look closely I had to change it a few times, in minor ways. That was because D.U. kept refusing to confirm it. Only after omitting the &#8220;standardnewswire&#8221; link did it go thru. But then surprise, the earlier to attempts were also recorded. So John going to have to figure out why that happens. Can&#8217;t have this &#8220;blacklist&#8221; notice popping up for no reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-2/#comment-799536</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-799536</guid>
		<description>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &quot;Protect America Act&quot; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#039;s specifications.

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php

And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &#8220;Protect America Act&#8221; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#8217;s specifications.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php</a></p>
<p>And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-799534</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-799534</guid>
		<description>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &quot;Protect America Act&quot; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#039;s specifications.

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php

And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.

http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html

Note the phrase: &quot;meaningful liability protection&quot;, eight paragraphs down. Trying to sneak a blanket exemption in for the telecoms.  now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &#8220;Protect America Act&#8221; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#8217;s specifications.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php</a></p>
<p>And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html</a></p>
<p>Note the phrase: &#8220;meaningful liability protection&#8221;, eight paragraphs down. Trying to sneak a blanket exemption in for the telecoms.  now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-799532</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-799532</guid>
		<description>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &quot;Protect America Act&quot; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#039;s specifications.

http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php

And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.

http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html

Note the phrase: &quot;meaningful liability protection&quot;, eight paragraphs down. Trying to sneak a blanket exemption in for the telecoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story is a smokescreen. It came out the very day that Prez Bush went to Congress to get the &#8220;Protect America Act&#8221; extended, perhaps made permanent. And get the Carriers (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc) exempt from any legal actions and law suits, concerning illegal wiretapping and monitoring of emails. AT&amp;T just happen to be the first one exposed as having created a facility for doing this, to the NSA&#8217;s specifications.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/307/spy-scandal.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Eavesdropping.php</a></p>
<p>And if  Bush wants to exempt all carriers from future law suits, then obvious others beside AT7T are either snooping in on the email, or soon will be.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/294761594.html</a></p>
<p>Note the phrase: &#8220;meaningful liability protection&#8221;, eight paragraphs down. Trying to sneak a blanket exemption in for the telecoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-798648</link>
		<dc:creator>James Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-798648</guid>
		<description>Makes sense. They&#039;re already looking at everything for Uncle Sam.  Could be a major source of new revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense. They&#8217;re already looking at everything for Uncle Sam.  Could be a major source of new revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hmeyers</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-798509</link>
		<dc:creator>hmeyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-798509</guid>
		<description>Yahoo is traded on NASDAQ.

They aren&#039;t owned by anyone.  AT&amp;T (formerly SBC) and Yahoo have a DSL promotion agreement.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo is traded on NASDAQ.</p>
<p>They aren&#8217;t owned by anyone.  AT&amp;T (formerly SBC) and Yahoo have a DSL promotion agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECA</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-798164</link>
		<dc:creator>ECA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-798164</guid>
		<description>11,
Yes they do...
do a search on google for SBC, watch the first few listings...
ATT
Yahoo internet, and SBC...
they used to have the SBC in their site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11,<br />
Yes they do&#8230;<br />
do a search on google for SBC, watch the first few listings&#8230;<br />
ATT<br />
Yahoo internet, and SBC&#8230;<br />
they used to have the SBC in their site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren the Ghoti</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797917</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren the Ghoti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797917</guid>
		<description>#13 - kdm

&quot;Don’t blame me; I voted for Kodos!&quot;

You&#039;re insane. Kang is our only hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 &#8211; kdm</p>
<p>&#8220;Don’t blame me; I voted for Kodos!&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re insane. Kang is our only hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbtins01@hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797824</link>
		<dc:creator>mbtins01@hotmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797824</guid>
		<description>Get used to it folks -- you are going to see more and more of this as they all realize there is money to be made or lawsuits to be avoided by doing it.

The Internet as we know it is dying.  Did you all really think that governments and big business would let something like it last that long?  Too much power to the common man and that is a very scary thing for business and government.

If they want to police the net, why don&#039;t they do a better job of cleaning up spam and porn?

I still remember that AT&amp;T -- my isp -- pulled all or most of the MP3 binary groups off the servers, but they are more than willing to keep alt.binaries.erotica.teen or whatever else it is.

If we spent have as much time in this country going after stuff that is really illegal and or harmful as we do acting as thugs for the MPAA and RIAA, kiddie porn and crap like that would have been wiped out years ago.

Exploit a child -- oh that&#039;s too bad -- what a shame.  Take a nickel from the RIAA or the MPAA -- off with his head!!!!

Mike T
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get used to it folks &#8212; you are going to see more and more of this as they all realize there is money to be made or lawsuits to be avoided by doing it.</p>
<p>The Internet as we know it is dying.  Did you all really think that governments and big business would let something like it last that long?  Too much power to the common man and that is a very scary thing for business and government.</p>
<p>If they want to police the net, why don&#8217;t they do a better job of cleaning up spam and porn?</p>
<p>I still remember that AT&amp;T &#8212; my isp &#8212; pulled all or most of the MP3 binary groups off the servers, but they are more than willing to keep alt.binaries.erotica.teen or whatever else it is.</p>
<p>If we spent have as much time in this country going after stuff that is really illegal and or harmful as we do acting as thugs for the MPAA and RIAA, kiddie porn and crap like that would have been wiped out years ago.</p>
<p>Exploit a child &#8212; oh that&#8217;s too bad &#8212; what a shame.  Take a nickel from the RIAA or the MPAA &#8212; off with his head!!!!</p>
<p>Mike T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdm</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797738</link>
		<dc:creator>jdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797738</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t blame me; &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; voted for Kodos!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame me; <i>I</i> voted for Kodos!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRAGaLOT</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797582</link>
		<dc:creator>FRAGaLOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797582</guid>
		<description>thank god I switch back to cable from AT&amp;T DSL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank god I switch back to cable from AT&amp;T DSL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhForTheLoveOf</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797579</link>
		<dc:creator>OhForTheLoveOf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797579</guid>
		<description>#4 - &lt;i&gt;You forgot something…
SBC also owns Yahoo…&lt;/i&gt;

Ummm... No...  They don&#039;t...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8211; <i>You forgot something…<br />
SBC also owns Yahoo…</i></p>
<p>Ummm&#8230; No&#8230;  They don&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster's Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797558</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster's Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797558</guid>
		<description>I for one welcome our InterWebitube overlords.
All Hail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one welcome our InterWebitube overlords.<br />
All Hail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Price</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/09/21/the-mpaa-wants-to-make-isps-their-bitch-and-police-the-interwebitubes-att-submits/comment-page-1/#comment-797537</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=13726#comment-797537</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t that a nice hoot? :(

c:\&gt;tracert somewhere

Tracing route to lb1.www.ms.akadns.net [207.46.192.254]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  3    13 ms     *        7 ms  Comcast
  4     8 ms     *        9 ms  Comcast
  5     7 ms     *        7 ms  Comcast
  6    82 ms     *       23 ms  Comcast
  7     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  Comcast
  8    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  12.86.180.241 - Not reported, but AT&amp;T
  9    93 ms    93 ms    87 ms  tbr2.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.66]
 10   150 ms    88 ms    87 ms  tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.12.121]
 11    90 ms    88 ms    88 ms  tbr2.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.122.10.197]
 12    87 ms    88 ms    88 ms  tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.134]
 13   116 ms    88 ms   143 ms  tbr2.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.10.62]

This should work.

If I want to do anything on my Comcast account, it has to go through AT&amp;T.  And no, I don&#039;t believe that what AT&amp;T is talking about is just an end-point.  If it hit&#039;s their network, they are going to examine that packet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t that a nice hoot? <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>c:\&gt;tracert somewhere</p>
<p>Tracing route to lb1.www.ms.akadns.net [207.46.192.254]<br />
over a maximum of 30 hops:</p>
<p>  1    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms    &lt;1 ms  192.168.0.1<br />
  2     *        *        *     Request timed out.<br />
  3    13 ms     *        7 ms  Comcast<br />
  4     8 ms     *        9 ms  Comcast<br />
  5     7 ms     *        7 ms  Comcast<br />
  6    82 ms     *       23 ms  Comcast<br />
  7     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  Comcast<br />
  8    12 ms    11 ms    11 ms  12.86.180.241 &#8211; Not reported, but AT&amp;T<br />
  9    93 ms    93 ms    87 ms  tbr2.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.66]<br />
 10   150 ms    88 ms    87 ms  tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.12.121]<br />
 11    90 ms    88 ms    88 ms  tbr2.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.122.10.197]<br />
 12    87 ms    88 ms    88 ms  tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.134]<br />
 13   116 ms    88 ms   143 ms  tbr2.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.10.62]</p>
<p>This should work.</p>
<p>If I want to do anything on my Comcast account, it has to go through AT&amp;T.  And no, I don&#8217;t believe that what AT&amp;T is talking about is just an end-point.  If it hit&#8217;s their network, they are going to examine that packet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

