Ever wonder where the name for 1000 Island dressing comes from? One theory is that it originated in this area of New York at the Ontario border. Here is the Wikipedia entry on the area.

Lot more pictures to see here.



  1. DeLeMa says:

    Great Gobs of Hornie Toads !! You guys sure know how to throw out a philosophical diatribe over a few pictures !
    I’m sticking with my own phallacies…all puns intently thought out but, delivered in spite of that.

  2. Angel H. Wong says:

    #13

    “If you hate yourself so much, go shoot yourself. The rest of us, some of whom actually understand that humans are 100% completely, utterly as natural and as much an integral part of the biosphere as anything else, will not miss you.”

    Apart from the French, where else have you seen men fuck up virgin landscape to build the castle of their dreams?

  3. Lauren the Ghoti says:

    “fuck up”
    Building beautiful, purposeful structures to improve the human experience of life? To refer back to my previous examples – do you eradicate spiderwebs everywhere you see them? Because, by your definition, they “fuck up” the “virgin landscape” they’re built in.

    You children are apparently incapable of grasping the concept that we evolved on this planet. It is ours. We are not invaders.

    “virgin landscape”
    Last time I looked, uncountable millions upon millions of square miles – in a fabulous variety of settings – exist for your enjoyment, free of any sign of the existence of those evil humans.

    Uninformed as you obviously are, you apparently never noticed that, in the U.S., f’rinstance, 98% + of the land is unoccupied.

    “to build the castle of their dreams”
    Living in mud huts – or better, caves – is more “noble”, right? Humans shouldn’t utilize human intelligence to improve their quality of life, is that it?

    We have not only every bit as much right to this planet as any species – we also have the right, by virtue of our preëminent intelligence and self-awareness, to responsibly, intelligently modify it to our purposes.

    We are the dominant species. Being the dominant species bestows upon us the right to be what we already are – the dominant species.

    And please spare all of us the red herrings. Wanton misappropriation, abuse and destruction of resources which belong to humanity as a whole does NOT constitute responsible, intelligent modification of the environment, and is NOT to our species’ long-term collective benefit – so please don’t bother trying to insinuate that anyone here (except iGW) condones it.

  4. #23 – Lauren,

    We have not only every bit as much right to this planet as any species – we also have the right, by virtue of our preëminent intelligence and self-awareness, to responsibly, intelligently modify it to our purposes.

    This argument is exactly the argument behind Eminent Domain with the religion removed. Your glorification of humanity well beyond what it deserves has almost a religious fervor without the dogma to make it a true religion.

    Being the dominant species does not convey rights. It conveys moral responsibility, especially in light of the intelligence you love to cite.

    Get over yourself. Humans aren’t special, unless it’s especially bad. We do not have a right to dominate the biosphere. We have a responsibility to protect it. There are other sentiences on this planet as well. Do we, by virtue of our thumbs, have the right to eradicate them? Do we, by virtue of our advanced weaponry, have a right to destroy that upon which we depend for our lives? Do we, by virtue of our thumbs, have the right to decimate everything in our paths? Though you do not advocate such behavior, you do seem to think it is within our right.

    I disagree.

    That does not make me a child. It makes me moral.



Bad Behavior has blocked 23865 access attempts in the last 7 days.