Comments on: Popping A Pill To Pop A Woody? Might Lose Your Hearing.

By: Glenn E

Glenn E — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 06:19:33 +0000

They found some old heart medication (that was probably going generic) that caused erections. So they jumped on remarketting it for a new purpose. Ignoring, of course, these possible side effects. They did that same thing with with the older medication than regrew hair. And even though these were developed from scratch, as they originally were. They once more charge thru the nose for their merely redefined use. No new costly research necessary (to have paid for). Also… Smoking tobacco leads to impotence. Which is what the Viagra is correcting for. But the government never require that warning on the cigarette packages. “Warning: Smoke can permanently screw up your sex life.” Now that would have stopped far more people than the cancer warning has. And they probably knew about this side effect for tobacco, a long time ago. But still there’s no warning about it. If they ever get around to doing that, it will probably say “Warning: Smoking will lead to Viagra.”

By: Mike Voice

Mike Voice — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:19:43 +0000

Rush Limbaugh and 28 others??

By: Joshua

Joshua — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:10:12 +0000

29 cases huh? Now, how many doses of Viagra and it’s knock off’s have been sold and popped since 1996? I think the last figure I saw was just for Viagra alone and was something like 40 million doses a year sold world wide.
Maybe someone has a more up to date figure.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:04:45 +0000

#9, hopper,

Could he?

Should he?

Would he?

By: hhopper

hhopper — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:26:58 +0000

How many woodies would a woody popper pop if a woody popper would pop woodies?

By: Angel H. Wong

Angel H. Wong — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:18:49 +0000

Quote from Family Guy

“Kids nowadays are having ear sex and you know what they say: Once you go black, you go deaf.”

By: Nelson

Nelson — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:43:44 +0000

Maybe they are just doing it wrong!

By: paddler

paddler — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:18:16 +0000

What’s better? Losing your hearing so you don’t have to listen to the old bats that you are f**king or losing your vision so you don’t have to look at them?

By: GigG

GigG — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:14:22 +0000

First your vision now hearing. Sounds like a fair trade.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:47:51 +0000

I’ll be deaf by the time I’m 50 from blasting my iPod in my ears – so yeah – I’ll pop a pill to pop a woody…

By: Cinaedh

Cinaedh — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:39:22 +0000

Maybe the deafness is a feature and not a bug?

By: tallwookie

tallwookie — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 14:01:13 +0000

yeah, watch out old people

By: NappyHeadedHo

NappyHeadedHo — Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:54:35 +0000

What?