It’s funny how much time the media spends trying to argue that they are not biased at all. The cause is very simple – they don’t consider themselves to be biased, just enlightened. It’s not as much about liberal or conservative to them as it is about right and wrong – they are right and conservatives are wrong. That’s not bias, that’s just commons sense right?

Of course there is no place for religion in a modern society.
Of course there should be government-funded medical insurance for all Americans.
Of course the war in Iraq was based on lies and serves no purpose other than making George Bush’s cronies rich.
Of course anyone who opposes gay marriage is a knuckle-dragging bigot.
Of course a fetus is not a person and is not entitled to protection under the law.
Of course the rich should be heavily taxed in order to improve the inequity of wealth in America.
Of course Hillary Clinton will be the next president.

It’s as plain as the nose on your face – right?

Anyway, as for this so called “forgone conclusion” that Senator Clinton will be the next President… I don’t buy it. We aren’t anywhere near knowing that. Too much can still happen, and there are still better candidates now.

For me, Richardson and Biden are far better choices, and like Bill Clinton in 92, they still have plenty of time to rise.

Maybe Hillary Clinton would be a good President, but I’m not behind her because I oppose her on several issues that are key to me, most notably First Amendment issues. But I do know that she is not a shoe in.

Sheesh. Just another example of the right-wing wackos trying to “work the refs”.

it’s called supply and demand — people only believe and will only pay for what they want to hear and are automatically skeptical of anything that differs from their personal beliefs.

#17 – (other than Ralph Nader, who suffers mightily from a combination of righteous indignation coupled with excessive dorkiness)

He also suffers from being right and from being the most successful citizen activist in the known universe… I can’t quite understand why Americans hate smart, honest, and successful candidates.

#18 – They needed to fund a study to figure this out? I could have told them this for free!

There was no “study” It’s just right wing blow hards doing what they do best… blowing hard… most likely in a men’s room at the airport.

I could accept what you say, if if weren’t that the right wingers are always telling us that THEY are the fair and balanced truthful counterpart to the “MSM”.

So I suppose if you ONLY count the +- 5% of right wing talk radio that is hard news, maybe this report might be possible.

Disagreeing with Rush does not = liberal bias. As much as he would like you to believe it.

Per Wikipedia,
“Elizabeth Dole ran for the Republican nomination in the US presidential election of 2000, but pulled out of the race in October 1999 before any of the primaries, largely due to inadequate fundraising.”

I think that the newsmedia of the time just realized that
they would look foolish giving much promotion to
a feeble and quixotic ambition.

She didn’t even last long enough to be interesting. And what
Wikipedia doesn’t seem to remember. but I do, she had her
campaign legs surgically and firmly removed by her own
party, which seemed to had gotten a case of the vapors
when it actually realized they might be nominating
a woman.

Steve Forbs tax plan was wacky. In fact for my entire life, all conservative/republican tax policy has been whack. There hasn’t been a time in my life where there was a balanced budget with a Republican president.

Considering American has been overwhelmingly conservative for the last 30 years and it is literally falling apart and bankrupt, don’t you think it is time for you people to stand down and let responsible adults take charge for a while?