Comments on: A few Dems with backbone – very few – halt immunity for Telcoms http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/ General interest observations and true web-log. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:53:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: MichelleM http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-933704 MichelleM Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:23:54 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-933704 Totally busted, your behaviour in this case is unacceptable. I am and have been reposting this story on more than 40 blogs by end of day today seeing as you are censoring it here and will not apologize. Totally busted, your behaviour in this case is unacceptable. I am and have been reposting this story on more than 40 blogs by end of day today seeing as you are censoring it here and will not apologize.

]]> By: Greg Allen http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924615 Greg Allen Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:14:12 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924615 # 10 Barister said <i> Good God! It was three days after 9/11 and the government came to these companies and ask them to help look for a larger conspiracy. They did it and now you want to sue them!! </i> We get attacked by some crazies and their first reaction is to flush the constitution down the crapper. But here's the creepy thing: Bush authorized secret vast spying on Americans BEFORE 9.11. http://tinyurl.com/p5n8p # 10 Barister said Good God! It was three days after 9/11 and the government came to these companies and ask them to help look for a larger conspiracy. They did it and now you want to sue them!!

We get attacked by some crazies and their first reaction is to flush the constitution down the crapper.

But here’s the creepy thing: Bush authorized secret vast spying on Americans BEFORE 9.11.

http://tinyurl.com/p5n8p

]]> By: RealityCheck http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924592 RealityCheck Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:01:23 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924592 <strong>[edit: see comments guide]</strong> [edit: see comments guide]

]]> By: god http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924393 god Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:05:15 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924393 Dvorak is cranky. Eideard is often irascible. I could give a shit. Dvorak is cranky. Eideard is often irascible. I could give a shit.

]]> By: Disappointed http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924385 Disappointed Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:59:15 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924385 god - your sarcasm is hilarious. well done. really. Oh I know proles like us will be rude in these comments, my point was more that Eidard appeared to work here for Dvorak so I was hoping, incorrectly, for him to be above such behavior and possibly professional. Oh well... god – your sarcasm is hilarious. well done. really.

Oh I know proles like us will be rude in these comments, my point was more that Eidard appeared to work here for Dvorak so I was hoping, incorrectly, for him to be above such behavior and possibly professional. Oh well…

]]> By: god http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924363 god Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:52:10 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924363 Oh golly, oh gosh. Someone at Dvorak Uncensored said something that was rude and offended. The whole fracking world of blogs is founded on hotlinks - and the occasional dweeb whines about it. Let's turn the whole Web into a tea party discussion club. Oh golly, oh gosh. Someone at Dvorak Uncensored said something that was rude and offended.

The whole fracking world of blogs is founded on hotlinks – and the occasional dweeb whines about it. Let’s turn the whole Web into a tea party discussion club.

]]> By: Disappointed http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924354 Disappointed Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:40:48 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924354 Eidard - Do you think its reasonable to link to someone else's images/content without attribution? Does Mr Dvorak? Its disheartening to see this couldn't be dealt with in a reasonable manner and that even your response to Mike's latest comment was rude and intended to needlessly offend. Eidard – Do you think its reasonable to link to someone else’s images/content without attribution? Does Mr Dvorak?

Its disheartening to see this couldn’t be dealt with in a reasonable manner and that even your response to Mike’s latest comment was rude and intended to needlessly offend.

]]> By: Eideard http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-924290 Eideard Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:51:11 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-924290 Mike - if you read our comments guide [you do read things like that, right?], you'd see that we edit a lot of crap from our comments. One of which is personal agendas which do not contribute to the discussion topic. Which is where your comment #12 fits. And all previous. Your state of denial over essential web functions - like linking - are <i>your</i> problem, not mine. John has emailed you with his position on your behavior. That's the end of it as far as I'm concerned. This is his blog and I try to comply with his standards - not yours. btw - I replaced your image with a copyrighted image from the Associated Press. I don't expect to be whined at by <i>them</i>. Mike – if you read our comments guide [you do read things like that, right?], you’d see that we edit a lot of crap from our comments. One of which is personal agendas which do not contribute to the discussion topic. Which is where your comment #12 fits. And all previous.

Your state of denial over essential web functions – like linking – are your problem, not mine.

John has emailed you with his position on your behavior. That’s the end of it as far as I’m concerned. This is his blog and I try to comply with his standards – not yours.

btw – I replaced your image with a copyrighted image from the Associated Press. I don’t expect to be whined at by them.

]]> By: Mike Harding http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923748 Mike Harding Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:17:55 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923748 Thank you for taking down the image you appropriated. That is responsible. What is irresponsible is now erasing all trace that it has happened. I would like an apology and an entry on why this happened, why my entirely reasonable comments have been deleted, and what the standard will be going forward. Patiently waiting, and chronicling the event here: montaraventures.com/blog/2007/12/18/dvorak-steals-copyrighted-work/ Thank you for taking down the image you appropriated. That is responsible. What is irresponsible is now erasing all trace that it has happened. I would like an apology and an entry on why this happened, why my entirely reasonable comments have been deleted, and what the standard will be going forward.

Patiently waiting, and chronicling the event here:

montaraventures.com/blog/2007/12/18/dvorak-steals-copyrighted-work/

]]> By: god http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923666 god Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:37:15 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923666 "You people, you people". Yup. Us silly people who think the Constitution is in place 24/7, good, bad or indifferent. On the other hand, there are candyass opportunists who are willing to drop the rule of law for the rule of some dork in a white hat - I guess because they're in charge. Right? Pathetic. “You people, you people”. Yup. Us silly people who think the Constitution is in place 24/7, good, bad or indifferent.

On the other hand, there are candyass opportunists who are willing to drop the rule of law for the rule of some dork in a white hat – I guess because they’re in charge. Right?

Pathetic.

]]> By: Barister http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923630 Barister Wed, 19 Dec 2007 01:02:29 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923630 Good God! It was three days after 9/11 and the government came to these companies and ask them to help look for a larger conspiracy. They did it and now you want to sue them!! You people are probably the same ones who were screaming that the Bush administration should have connected all the dots! Good God! It was three days after 9/11 and the government came to these companies and ask them to help look for a larger conspiracy. They did it and now you want to sue them!! You people are probably the same ones who were screaming that the Bush administration should have connected all the dots!

]]> By: Greg Allen http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923591 Greg Allen Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:13:58 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923591 Parroting the conservative talking points again, I see: This isn't the fault of constitution-hating conservative Republicans. The REAL problem is the Dems who haven't stopped them yet. Parroting the conservative talking points again, I see:

This isn’t the fault of constitution-hating conservative Republicans.

The REAL problem is the Dems who haven’t stopped them yet.

]]> By: MikeN http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923479 MikeN Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:25:53 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923479 Well in that case, go after the President. Well in that case, go after the President.

]]> By: Improbus http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923392 Improbus Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:52:11 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923392 @MikeN [sarcasm on] You are right Mike. This has nothing to do with a President running roughshod over the Constitution and protecting his "buddies". [sarcasm off] @MikeN

[sarcasm on]
You are right Mike. This has nothing to do with a President running roughshod over the Constitution and protecting his “buddies”.
[sarcasm off]

]]> By: MikeN http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2007/12/18/a-few-dems-with-backbone-very-few-halt-immunity-for-telcos/comment-page-1/#comment-923365 MikeN Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:24:58 +0000 http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=15143#comment-923365 Oh boy, go after the telecom companies for helping the military. This is all about protecting lawyers' fees. Oh boy, go after the telecom companies for helping the military. This is all about protecting lawyers’ fees.

]]>