Comments on: 80-year-old man puts intruder in hospital

By: waffle

waffle — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 05:21:02 +0000

Also he was a ww2 vet that enuff to make him a hero (expecaly in texas)but a fire fighter to!!! Wow I solute him so lay off once uve fought a war and fire lived to be 80 and are about to be robed then u can bitch all you want. But in texas we suport ower forces expecoly world war
In a single battle 600 young men stormed a beach 12 made it alive I remember that story not cause I know one of the 12 but because a ex spec ops told me that he fought desert sheld and for those of you fucktards that don’t know what that is that was the start of iraq 1000s of troops were deployed he was already there watch the movie jar head he foght that war and was already experienced
Whene that happend. So i urge you to watch that movie only cause whene he watches that movie then steps out for a smoke I go out with him not to smoke but to hear him tell me a story that would make you so shocked that that you arnt shure if u got struck by lightning
Or …. I think every time of that freind of mine walking down memory lane from hell and telling me those storysthat tv can’t show you or the enternet I didn’t believe it mostly cause I wanted to supress the truth then these story kept coming and coming and I wanted to wish that they wernt true now I’m no wimp I can gut any thing from a fish to a deer without a problem and so can my freind

By: waffles

waffles — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:58:11 +0000

Ohh and in texas tresspasing is reson enuff to pull out a gun think gran torino with clint eastwood (another great actor) now don’t get me wrong
We don’t shoot girl scout selling cookies or boy scout selling popcorn………….. Mabey cock the gun to get rid of the door to door guy(just joking by the way) be sides we have chuck norris any way you don’t hear on the news “another count of 15 people were killed for walking on some guys lawn ” no cause. Its texas and. If you post study texas law first please I’m reading post from californicators and new yorkers and I’m cracken up

By: waffles

waffles — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:44:45 +0000

I’m just gonna say I’m 16 and iv shot plenty of shotgun and rifle its only a good idea if you know what your doing iv never missed with a rifle EVER and my granny said when she was a student in highschool they had gun racks for students in the class there wasn’t any crazy school shootings or.heavy crime rate then now look more control more crime I know a guy who’s sons car was heavaly searched looking for a bomb cause his dad left a few EMPTY shotgun rounds in the bed of the truck again 16 never missed my mark I’m from texas

By: cancan18

cancan18 — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 06:10:39 +0000

You know those boys are not bad boys if you looked into more in there life you would know they where under some stuff that they stole from there mother an that old man il a lier.

By: Shirley Johnson

Shirley Johnson — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:36:28 +0000

Did John Wayne shoot anyone in their back as Mr. Pickett did? Two Major Wars never did create in my Dad nor any other Veteran of the United States Armed Forces that I have known throughout my lifetime, a desire to shoot anyone… How could anyone in his position shoot a young man in the back?

The news Media needs to learn ALL of the FACTS before condemning these two young men to Hell.
How will they ever get a fair trial anywhere in the State of Texas.

Curious Lady

By: marti

marti — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:26:58 +0000

From my personal observation I feel that the Press nor the Media should not have made Public THEIR OPINIONS regarding these two young men… Incidently… Wasn’t one of the brothers shot in the back IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET AWAY FROM HIS ATTAKER! Unfortunately Mr. Pickett does not know that “John Wayne” never did shoot ANYONE IN THEIR BACK!

My Father was a WWII Veteran, as well as he fought in the Korean War, but despite the disposition he maintained, I never, under any circumstances saw him resort to guns being in our home.

I simply do not understand why the News Media and the arresting Officer Rose has continued to Pre-judge and condemn these two young men to Hell without knowing the truth from their perspective! How will they ever get a fair trial in Hood County or in fact anywhere in Texas since their purported crimes have been condoned by the ivestigators of the case, as well as the News Media?

Signed,

Curious Lady

By: Mister Catshit

Mister Catshit — Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:13:00 +0000

#51, Savantish,

I don’t waste too much time trying to prove the obvious.

Obviously you have wasted your time ignoring the obvious.

Lott is supported in his research by members of the gun lobby. The largest contributer is also tied to America’s largest manufacturer of ammunition which benefits from more ammo sales.

His “actual survey” is flawed beyond redemption. For example, at least nine studies found defenders shoot back 21 to 67% of the time. Lott claimed only 2%.

Lott used a sample of 2 of 28 cases shot back. That is 7%, not the 2% he wrote in his book.

There is no evidence of a survey Lott claimed he made. The eight students Lott claimed did the work are unknown and can’t be found.

Lott has cited his sources for the 98% as either national surveys or polls. These other statistics and surveys are unknown.

Lott assumed an pseudonym, Mary Rosh, to push his agenda and toot his own horn. He never fully explained this. As a former student though, Rosh claimed he was a wonderful teacher.

Even though Lott’s work can’t be verified, he claims it was all lost in a hard drive failure, what is published has been shown to be blatantly false, and he has resorted to fraud, he remains a “resident scholar” at the American Enterprise Institute and is still widely quoted in conservative circles.

Yup. Sometimes the obvious isn’t worth looking up when it doesn’t suit the right wing nut agenda.

By: Savantish

Savantish — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:12:09 +0000

#49, Mr. Catshit,

I don’t waste too much time trying to prove the obvious. If you’re truly interested in taking an objective look, the book in the first link provides all the citations you need. Otherwise, just believe whatever you want.

By: Mister Catshit

Mister Catshit — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:32:38 +0000

#48, Philleep,

Here we go again.

Instead of backing up an untenable position, you scream for your opponent to produce evidence. Lott is a hack who published poorly researched, bad statistics, and preconcieved answers as a way to gain favor with his pre-stated position.

You don’t like that? Too bad. Prove it wrong for once. No, don’t cite some opinion piece. Cite some facts that demonstrate that Lott’s gun statistics are correct. If he was so right, that shouldn’t be difficult.

By: Mister Catshit

Mister Catshit — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:21:37 +0000

#38, Savantish,

Where are these studies? Your links point to two opinion pieces. If I wanted opinion, I can just listen to all the ill informed wing nuts here.

By: Phillep

Phillep — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:47:36 +0000

Nate, cite on Lott being discredited. The actual work, not the second hand stuff.

By: the Three-Headed Cat™

the Three-Headed Cat™ — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:41:43 +0000

#40 – savantish

“Have you experienced the relative peace and tranquility of Liverpool?”

That is truly rich; I wish I had said it…

By: Steve S

Steve S — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:39:50 +0000

#44
Heck in Texas, you can even defend someone else’s home, with deadly force, after the crime has taken place, and still not worry too much about it. Just ask Joe Horn.
http://tinyurl.com/2e69lf

By: natefrog

natefrog — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:24:21 +0000

#38, savantish;

Stop trotting Lott about as your savior of gun stats. His work has been roundly discredited in academic circles.

By: patrick

patrick — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:36:14 +0000

“You just know that the two robbers are going to sue Mr. Pickett for assault and attempted murder… and more than likely win their case. This is the litigious USA, remember.”

Luckily, in Texas you can defend your home without worrying too much about this..