<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LED lamp lit by gravity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kintaar</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1009363</link>
		<dc:creator>Kintaar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 09:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1009363</guid>
		<description>If the white LEDs are perfectly efficient (250 lumens / watt), and the generator is perfectly efficient, and the light fixture is one meter tall...

The weight has to be 3526.5 kilos.  That&#039;s a heavy desk lamp!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the white LEDs are perfectly efficient (250 lumens / watt), and the generator is perfectly efficient, and the light fixture is one meter tall&#8230;</p>
<p>The weight has to be 3526.5 kilos.  That&#8217;s a heavy desk lamp!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004556</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004556</guid>
		<description>That would be the Atmos Clock -- not sure they&#039;re still around, but they were in the 50&#039;s. As for the light, I like the idea of a wind up mechanism. Some competent engineer could easily figure how to wind it for 8 days of power....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be the Atmos Clock &#8212; not sure they&#8217;re still around, but they were in the 50&#8242;s. As for the light, I like the idea of a wind up mechanism. Some competent engineer could easily figure how to wind it for 8 days of power&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rodwell</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004502</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rodwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004502</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;When researching perpetual motion some time back, I read about a clock made in 1760 by James Cox (Cox’s timepiece) which was powered by changing atmospheric pressure.&lt;/i&gt;

I believe these are still made by somebody somewhere (although I just did a quick Google search and couldn&#039;t find one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>When researching perpetual motion some time back, I read about a clock made in 1760 by James Cox (Cox’s timepiece) which was powered by changing atmospheric pressure.</i></p>
<p>I believe these are still made by somebody somewhere (although I just did a quick Google search and couldn&#8217;t find one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004418</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004418</guid>
		<description>So really it’s powered not by gravity but by the user’s muscle power.

When researching perpetual motion some time back, I read about a clock made in 1760 by James Cox (Cox&#039;s timepiece) which was powered by changing atmospheric pressure.  One of his clocks ran for hundreds of years until recently moved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So really it’s powered not by gravity but by the user’s muscle power.</p>
<p>When researching perpetual motion some time back, I read about a clock made in 1760 by James Cox (Cox&#8217;s timepiece) which was powered by changing atmospheric pressure.  One of his clocks ran for hundreds of years until recently moved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004358</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004358</guid>
		<description>This thing has 50 pounds of weight.  Turning it upside down is no small feat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This thing has 50 pounds of weight.  Turning it upside down is no small feat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calin</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004336</link>
		<dc:creator>Calin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004336</guid>
		<description>This is only useful on the small scale.  If you want more time of output, you need a higher tower.  Eventually for more output or more time you will spend too much energy moving the device back to the top of the tower than it&#039;s worth.

However, I do like the bedside lamp idea...or lights for power outages.  I live in the country and have rechargeable lanterns for outages and storms.  This would be much nicer.  And 600-800 lumens is great for night time reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only useful on the small scale.  If you want more time of output, you need a higher tower.  Eventually for more output or more time you will spend too much energy moving the device back to the top of the tower than it&#8217;s worth.</p>
<p>However, I do like the bedside lamp idea&#8230;or lights for power outages.  I live in the country and have rechargeable lanterns for outages and storms.  This would be much nicer.  And 600-800 lumens is great for night time reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004194</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004194</guid>
		<description>I want one.  It will look nice next to my Galileo thermometer.

You know though, this could replace a lot of battery driven devices with a smaller tower?  I&#039;m thinking of my &quot;life time&quot; weight scales that go out every 2 years with a non-replaceable battery.  Why not just flip it upside down and get it powered for 3 minutes to get weighted?==No, maybe a wind-up mechanism would be better for that.  

A little retro technology would be good for our future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want one.  It will look nice next to my Galileo thermometer.</p>
<p>You know though, this could replace a lot of battery driven devices with a smaller tower?  I&#8217;m thinking of my &#8220;life time&#8221; weight scales that go out every 2 years with a non-replaceable battery.  Why not just flip it upside down and get it powered for 3 minutes to get weighted?==No, maybe a wind-up mechanism would be better for that.  </p>
<p>A little retro technology would be good for our future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004103</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004103</guid>
		<description>Very clever and 4hours of continuous light output is surprisingly long for this many lumen. Wow.

This would make a great desk, chair or bedside reading lamp - not to mention one for power outage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very clever and 4hours of continuous light output is surprisingly long for this many lumen. Wow.</p>
<p>This would make a great desk, chair or bedside reading lamp &#8211; not to mention one for power outage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OmegaMan</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1004029</link>
		<dc:creator>OmegaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1004029</guid>
		<description>The next winner is the plug the electrodes in the lemon to power your lamp idea....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next winner is the plug the electrodes in the lemon to power your lamp idea&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Rodwell</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/02/19/led-lamp-lit-by-gravity/comment-page-1/#comment-1003916</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Rodwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=16157#comment-1003916</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;To “turn on” the lamp, the user moves weights from the bottom to the top of the lamp&lt;/i&gt;

So really it&#039;s powered not by gravity but by the user&#039;s muscle power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>To “turn on” the lamp, the user moves weights from the bottom to the top of the lamp</i></p>
<p>So really it&#8217;s powered not by gravity but by the user&#8217;s muscle power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

