Court upholds man’s conviction for having sex with dead deer
A state appeals court has upheld a Superior’s man conviction for having sex with a dead deer.
The 3rd District Court of Appeals rejected Bryan Hathaway’s argument that the charge should be dismissed because the law against committing an act of sexual gratification with animals does not apply if they are dead.
“He rather convincingly contends that animal means a living creature,” Judge Gregory Peterson wrote. “However, Peterson pled no contest to the charge. A plea of guilty or no contest waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses.”
[...]
Hathaway told investigators that he saw a dead deer in a ditch near Superior in fall 2006 as he rode a bicycle by it. He then dragged it into the woods and had sex with it.
No more sex on the bear rug in front of the fireplace!
From the article about this guy: “Hathaway was found guilty in April 2005 of felony mistreatment of an animal after he killed a horse with the intention of having sex with it.” Come on, pick a species and stick with it.
#4 bobbo. “pretty soon we won’t be allowed to have sex with three pound packages of hamburger meat either”
Maybe you could close the door and no one would know?
RBG
#20
Thats what I’m saying! we deserved a dvorak banner. And don’t forget the Parteeville woman that was playing show and tell with a dildo and her twelve year old kids.
This adds a new twist on the old “not in it for the hunt joke”. If some parties in the Wisconsin outback are getting their groove on with the Bambi Family, you have to cringe thinking about what might be happening in the wee hours with all those milking machines. Doh! (Pun Intended) If this keeps happening, maybe they should bring in Elmer Fudd for major “What Not To Boink” Campaign. Such as a “West and Waxation Wiff WIMMIN in Wondufful Wiffconson” Week. Or “Wuv YOUR Wife Not Ouwah Whilwife”. I kid the perverts, but it must be tough going through life with a possible dates short list of moose, elk, caribou or antelope instead of Becky, Alice or Gwen. The real victims(other than the wildlife)here are the therapist who will have to put carpet tacks in their chairs to avoid a ROFL fit, while they sit straight-faced and listen to the perv-in-rehab stories about how it all happened.
#4 “Where does that put our value on life and the natural joys of sex?”
Key Word – Natural. This isn’t natural. Good law. If we let everyone do this, it would alter “natural” evolution. On the other hand, we would be able to run faster.
#22–RBG==well, thats kinda the point==if its not against the law why can’t you have this sex “outside” and enjoy it and the great outdoors as well? Vestiges of sexual repression. Where are my PRIVACY RIGHT WHEN OUTDOORS?—OFTLO?
#25–Hillary–there is Darwinian selection at play here but evolution does not work when mating with dead animals==but I take your point. My thought (validly?) is that the impulse to mate with dead things ought to breed out fairly quickly? But maybe what will change is a narrow definition of “natural?” Given evolution proceeds on random events, I think mating with any thing available will over time provide our greatest chance for success as an evolving species?
Is having sex while wearing a natural lambskin condom allowed? How much of the dead animal has to be present for it to be creepy?
#28–Gary==I once had a 100% alive drunk babe pass out on me during foreplay. Was it creepy thereafter? A gentleman would never say—so, yes it was.
I bet you really regretted that last drink you bought her, eh bobbo? One yard to go and there’s a flag on the play.
Doh!!
Doe??
@29–Gary==to tell the truth, I didn’t think we had been drinking THAT much.
To be actually truthful for a change–this lady had actually dated a guy I knew at work for a few months. I told him what had happened and he laughed saying that the same thing had happened on his first date with her==”but” he ignored that flag. Upshot was they kept dating. Seems it was her MO for not taking responsibility.
Yes, there are all types out there. Happiness is finding your own type sometime before you die and hopefully, everything remains legal?
Maybe he could blame his mom’s punctuation. Claim it was a semantic antic due to his hearing her say, “Not tonight. Deer.”
I had a girlfriend once who was allergic to latex, so we had to use those nasty-ass sheep bladders. I suppose this means I had sex with her, and also part of a dead animal . . . at the same time. Ew. Or, should I say . . ewe?
Wisconsin > Where you live.
#26 bobbo – “..impulse to mate with dead things ought to breed out fairly quickly?..”
Possibly
“natural?” – I believe in general we as mankind know deep inside ourselves when something is right or wrong to do (In some things). In my opinion this is a God given discernment, though not all things are “naturally” discerned – I also believe many things are learned.
“..Given evolution proceeds on random events, I think mating with any thing available will over time provide our greatest chance for success as an evolving species?”
Can you theorize here? Trying to honestly understand your point here.
#35–Hillary==you say “In my opinion this is a God given discernment”–if true, then it becomes obvious that that god does not give this discernment to all people in equal measure.
The “mating with everything” was mostly humorous but with a point==its not obvious that joining organs of excrement will produce a child 9 months later. Who is to say that mating with a deer would not produce something as well?==Only the scientific method will reveal what gods plan is. Although, I do think being dead is kinda a clear line to stay on this side of==but cheers to the brave experimenters.
Who or what is the victim in this crime?