Comments on: Cute Obama Ad

By: Ruffian

Ruffian — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 22:07:00 +0000

MikeN, don’t look now, but Obama is WINNING the popular vote count too.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:15:30 +0000

Either way Obama will end up leading in the delegate count while losing the popular vote and the electoral vote, as well as the winner-take-all delegate count.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:14:08 +0000

She wasn’t engaged in very much, mostly because they told her to get lost. Where she was engaged, it was the opposite of what she claims now. She helped push for NAFTA. NOw she claims that health care was all Bill’s fault.

By: gregallen

gregallen — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:27:59 +0000

Sorry. Not buying the ad.

Politics isn’t surgery. Totally invalid analogy.

Hillary was a FRONT ROW, engaged first lady.

She was not a LAURA BUSH, she was an Eleanor Roosevelt.

I, personally think Eleanor could have stepped into the presidency and done a great job.

By: Mr. Catshit

Mr. Catshit — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:17:35 +0000

#20, Mark,

Maybe. There is so little difference between Clinton and Obama. The differences are so small we are now arguing over “tastes great” and “less filling”. Yet this is what they must define if they are to win the nomination.

After the dust settles and we have a single nominee, look for a substantial change in the rhetoric and much more focus on McCain’s bungling.

By: Chris Mac

Chris Mac — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:16:47 +0000

The credits must be part of the joke

By: Hmeyers

Hmeyers — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:09:05 +0000

@17 … LOL!

By: Kemal

Kemal — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:45:33 +0000

Yeah me too like Hussein Obama! Love from Turkey!

By: Mark Derail

Mark Derail — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:11:57 +0000

hand raised

I don’t get it.

Is it because I’m Canadian?

By: Sea Lawyer

Sea Lawyer — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:55:08 +0000

I’ve never really understood this debate about presidential qualifications anyway. Yes, I would like the person who will be President to have a good level of knowledge about current events and situations in the world, a good understanding of history and knows something about how economics really works. Being able to effectively communicate with people and get them to work together is a necessity too. But what “qualifications” does one really need to be President?

I don’t see Obama as being any less or more “qualified” than either Clinton or McCain. The only real qualifications required are those that are outlined in the Constitution. Hell, most of our past presidents have either been lawyers, soldiers or both, and it seems to me that all three candidates fall into one of those groups. This does not mean that I view their proposals and ideas as being of equal merit.

By: pat

pat — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:54:47 +0000

#17 – That would have been great.

By: Mr. Catshit

Mr. Catshit — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:28:36 +0000

I thought it was cute. A nice touch would have been to have McCain on the table.

By: Ah_Yea

Ah_Yea — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:44:05 +0000

The only thing that would have made this video better would have been the Obama girls standing in for the surgeons.

By: chuck

chuck — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:21:03 +0000

It took 6 people (including 3 “executive” producers) to produce that steaming pile.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:41:08 +0000

Obama should drop out while he’s ahead. He looks good for a future run. Just imagine how it’ll look if he said,’I don’t have the experience to be president. I endorse Gore.’