<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gphone launch delayed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: qsabe</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1206366</link>
		<dc:creator>qsabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1206366</guid>
		<description>Google is becoming to large.  They have stopped providing what I want and started pushing what they want on me.  Google Earth refusing to install where I want it was just the start.  I see the next Microsoft here.  Hang on Yahoo, you will win by default.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is becoming to large.  They have stopped providing what I want and started pushing what they want on me.  Google Earth refusing to install where I want it was just the start.  I see the next Microsoft here.  Hang on Yahoo, you will win by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmj3325</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1205970</link>
		<dc:creator>lmj3325</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1205970</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; # 10 chuck said,  on June 23rd, 2008 at 1:21 pm
&gt;&gt; That way they can charge everyone twice.

Not everyone..just sheep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; # 10 chuck said,  on June 23rd, 2008 at 1:21 pm<br />
&gt;&gt; That way they can charge everyone twice.</p>
<p>Not everyone..just sheep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1205359</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1205359</guid>
		<description>#12 you mean those mac made pocketpc phone knock-offs, or you mean the knock-offs from the mac knock-offs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#12 you mean those mac made pocketpc phone knock-offs, or you mean the knock-offs from the mac knock-offs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Jewdy</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1205071</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Jewdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1205071</guid>
		<description>#10 - Couldn&#039;t afford one, huh Chuck?

http://tinyurl.com/3rf9j3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10 &#8211; Couldn&#8217;t afford one, huh Chuck?</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3rf9j3" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/3rf9j3' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/3rf9j3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1205045</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1205045</guid>
		<description>Google should do what Apple did:
Come out with the gPhone now, but with a lousy connection and no support for 3rd-party apps.
Then in a year, come out with the 3G version and a proper SDK.
That way they can charge everyone twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google should do what Apple did:<br />
Come out with the gPhone now, but with a lousy connection and no support for 3rd-party apps.<br />
Then in a year, come out with the 3G version and a proper SDK.<br />
That way they can charge everyone twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204966</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204966</guid>
		<description>Vista&#039;s release was repeatedly delayed in order to make &quot;quality improvements&quot;.  That turned out pretty well. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vista&#8217;s release was repeatedly delayed in order to make &#8220;quality improvements&#8221;.  That turned out pretty well. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gsl</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204855</link>
		<dc:creator>Gsl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204855</guid>
		<description>Is this bad?
If I am understanding this correctly, they used to say that the gphone would be released in the second half of the year, which is a 6 month timespan.
Now they say it will be released in the 4th quarter of the year (and I assume they talk about 2008), so they&#039;re still within the first timeframe given, they have even narrowed it further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this bad?<br />
If I am understanding this correctly, they used to say that the gphone would be released in the second half of the year, which is a 6 month timespan.<br />
Now they say it will be released in the 4th quarter of the year (and I assume they talk about 2008), so they&#8217;re still within the first timeframe given, they have even narrowed it further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204827</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204827</guid>
		<description>My feeling is that Android is gonna have the same everlasting moniker as almost everything google does: Beta.

And there goes the public appeasement to not tolerate but like &quot;good enough&quot; products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feeling is that Android is gonna have the same everlasting moniker as almost everything google does: Beta.</p>
<p>And there goes the public appeasement to not tolerate but like &#8220;good enough&#8221; products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ah_Yea</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204805</link>
		<dc:creator>Ah_Yea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204805</guid>
		<description>I suspect Google realized that they need one Helluva slam dunk to make a dent in the mobile phone market and that their current Gphone didn&#039;t deliver.

Time to stop and rethink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Google realized that they need one Helluva slam dunk to make a dent in the mobile phone market and that their current Gphone didn&#8217;t deliver.</p>
<p>Time to stop and rethink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QB</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204798</link>
		<dc:creator>QB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204798</guid>
		<description>Fun platform to write code on - it&#039;s probably on high end of the scale with iPhone SDK for that. Nokia truly sucks, can&#039;t stand Carbide. Palm is Mac OS 7. And MS&#039;s mobile platform is a multi-pronged weird mishmash.

OK as a developer it would be most fun to do Android or iPhone. I just have no clue the Gphone strategy is. Is it just another handset platform? Is it about bringing Google to the mobile world (it&#039;s been done)? Is about a new delivery platform away from the traditional telcos? Has anyone physically used this platform outside of an emulator?

Technically interesting. No clue what it will look like in a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun platform to write code on &#8211; it&#8217;s probably on high end of the scale with iPhone SDK for that. Nokia truly sucks, can&#8217;t stand Carbide. Palm is Mac OS 7. And MS&#8217;s mobile platform is a multi-pronged weird mishmash.</p>
<p>OK as a developer it would be most fun to do Android or iPhone. I just have no clue the Gphone strategy is. Is it just another handset platform? Is it about bringing Google to the mobile world (it&#8217;s been done)? Is about a new delivery platform away from the traditional telcos? Has anyone physically used this platform outside of an emulator?</p>
<p>Technically interesting. No clue what it will look like in a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204786</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204786</guid>
		<description>That stinks. I was hoping to have the option for an Android phone by this fall. I probably need a newer phone before then. Sigh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That stinks. I was hoping to have the option for an Android phone by this fall. I probably need a newer phone before then. Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moss</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204773</link>
		<dc:creator>moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204773</guid>
		<description>#2 - answer 1, &quot;If you believe?&quot;

Answer 2, &quot;Uh, there are 3 months in a quarter.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 &#8211; answer 1, &#8220;If you believe?&#8221;</p>
<p>Answer 2, &#8220;Uh, there are 3 months in a quarter.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Personality</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204751</link>
		<dc:creator>Personality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204751</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only a 2 month delay, big whoop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only a 2 month delay, big whoop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deowll</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/06/23/gphone-launch-delayed/comment-page-1/#comment-1204729</link>
		<dc:creator>deowll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=18712#comment-1204729</guid>
		<description>I think they may be about to miss the boat on this one and this is something that can impact their bottom line. Apple for one looks to be interested in tieing users to their web sites directly which means less  google searching.

Mmmm....Things like  book marks in browsers most likely do cost google money as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they may be about to miss the boat on this one and this is something that can impact their bottom line. Apple for one looks to be interested in tieing users to their web sites directly which means less  google searching.</p>
<p>Mmmm&#8230;.Things like  book marks in browsers most likely do cost google money as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

