Furthermore, Ron Suskind has revealed that Bush directed the forgery of a letter connecting Iraq to the 9/11 attacks. Bush is beyond help.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA

Horse shit? Nice ad hominem attack, but do you have any comment to disprove or rebut it?

Not quite.

Misleading Congress is at least impeachable. It is also a criminal exercise as Contempt of Congress.

Contempt of Congress is not pardonable by the President.

Journalist Seymour Hersh stated that Cheney wanted to build and paint up boats that looked like Iranian PT boats. Then put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. What were the other 10 plans Cheney cooked up to get us into a war with Iran that were NOT told?

We are ruled by criminal nutcases.

Have you been following this presidency at all?

There has been book-after-book describing how out-of-touch Bush as been with the workings of his administration.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares

and reportedly never broadcast in the USA!

One of the very few acts that is undisputably criminal for a sitting President is lying under oath (not just any old form of lying). Bush deftly sidestepped this possibility when he agreed to talk to the 9-11 Commission only under the conditions that he would not be under oath to tell the truth, no transcript or recording would be made, and his trusty Vice-President would be at his side (separate interviews could show dangerous contradictions).

Not knowing the questions in advance, he may not have gone into the interview intending to lie in his responses, but he certainly didn’t want to preclude that possibility, and he especially didn’t want any such lying to constitute an impeachable offense.

The biggest problem with prosecuting Bush’s lies is that he has never been under oath. Nonetheless, knowingly raising a false case for war and deceiving many Americans leaves Bush’s hands drenched with the blood of the innocent.

OK, I could agree with that. I just hope that President Cheney and his puppet are held accountable for their transgressions.

While I understand your sentiments, I don’t agree. Bush, Cheney, and company are common criminals and should be treated as such. The refusal of a fair trial for detainees is their crime, not their punishment.

During the Nuremberg trials of former Nazis, Herman Goering wanted to be executed, as a soldier, by firing squad. The court said no. His crimes were criminal, his punishment would be accordingly and he was to be hung.

Remember, when we stoop to their level, we become no better than them. But having said that, it would be nice. Can you picture Cheney trying to convince someone he deserved to die wrapped in the American flag?

Because I disagree with you, I’m throwing BS?

No. I claim you are throwing bullshit because that is exactly what you did. Here is a claim from a reputable, investigative reporter that claims Cheney ordered a devious fraud. Your response is to downplay that and turn the topic by saying they all do it. They all don’t break the law.

Also, see my last point.

But in reality they are different sides of the same coin. If you take an objective look at both parties (and some of the minor parties as well.) you will find criminal acts that have been thoroughly prosecuted and punished.

More FUD. If you take an objective look at ANY group you will find criminal activity. Red Cross, Catholic Church, Evangelical churches, Wing nut universities, whomever, the greater the power the position holds, the greater the potential for criminal acts. The position does not need to be political.

Having said that, over the past few years there have been far more Republicans charged with Felony crimes than have Democrats.

I am only saying that if there were, as stated in this and many other blog entries, true proof of criminal acts they would be put in jail.

What hole in the sand has your head been in ??? The White House has blocked every attempt to investigate these crimes. Even though there is proof of illegalities, the Justice Department won’t prosecute because of White House interference.

Dan Rather was a credited journalist who produced fake news, BTW.

What the fuck has that to do with anything ??? Oh ya, just more FUD because his “story” was about the President. Well guess what. There are no records he completed his service. That means he didn’t complete his service. Rather is correct and has not been disproved.

This is the wing nut attitude of throwing bullshit and hoping it sticks. All you really wanted to do is turn the attention from the damage being done to your boy.

Quality post. Thanks for sharing. Steam thanks you too.

Yeah, now we just toss their ass in Gitmo, or send ‘em out for extreme rendition.

I hope President Cheney gets a taste of his own medicine.

what ever happened to inocent untill proven guilty?

A concept the Republicans have done away with.