Comments on: Sarah Palin’s e-mail hack? There still isn’t any patch for stupidity!

By: Mister Mustard

Mister Mustard — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:51:55 +0000

#60 – O’Furniture

>>Looks like he is going down. 5-12 for this one.

I doubt it. We all know from Law & Order re-runs that a prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.

This is all smoke and mirrors to put attention on the whistleblower, rather than where it belongs: Why was Palin using unauthorized, clandestine, nonsecure email accounts to conduct state business??

The kid will have some kind of kangaroo court trial and get a $50 fine, or they’ll dismiss the charges.

The MSM will continue to follow the story about the kid, and will fail to investigate what Palin was hiding in her under-the-radar email communications.

After the election, when she’s not news any longer and goes back to her frozen tundra, the whole thing will just go away.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:32:39 +0000

#57 “Right now there is NOT ONE PIECE of verifiable evidence that this kid had anything to do with it.”

Looks like he is going down. 5-12 for this one.

By: Mister Mustard

Mister Mustard — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:01:02 +0000

#33 – J

>>Hell on this blog people pretend to be other
>>people all the time. Ask Mr. Mustard.

I hate it when they do that.

#25 – Pillory

>>No instead we get little or no news coverage >>…… Can the bias be more obvious?

Right. We get no coverage here, because the REAL story is Sarracuda’s illegal use of a freebie e-mail account to conduct business for the state of Alaska. Not this nonsense about who hacked into what.

And since most of the MainStream Media tilts to the right, the story gets no coverage.

By: J

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 16:10:46 +0000

Paddy-O

Here is a link that lays it all out for you. The logic and reason that a lot of you Republicans use is circular and this situation PROVES IT!!

http://tinyurl.com/42pp2n

Again this kid may be guilty but that doesn’t change the fact that the logic and evidence used to lynch him online are those of a hypocrite and hate monger.

As of right this minute he STILL is not a named suspect.

By: J

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 03:36:40 +0000

This kid may be guilty. I don’t know, but as it sits there is nothing more than rumor and lies spreading through the right wing blogosphere as fact. So much so that the family is receiving death threats. Right now there is NOT ONE PIECE of verifiable evidence that this kid had anything to do with it. Yet Michelle Malkin seems to think that because she got some email from someone claiming to know the person that did it and it agrees with her agenda it of course must be true. And since one right wing blogger says it that is enough proof for them. That is typical Republican logic.

By: J

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 03:27:47 +0000

“Can I suggest a duel?”

Sure. Can I suggest that paddy boy not wear a dress. I don’t hit girls or men that wear dresses.

“Midnight at the bullring.”

We are in the bullring because I smell a lot of the shit paddy boy has been dropping.

“Bring dayglo dart guns and whatever KoolAid you both drink.”

Bare knuckles! Scotch!

“Fusion and I will moderate.”

ok but I think Fusion might already agree with me.

“We’re fair and balanced. ”

LOL Fair? Well I don’t know. Balanced? No way in hell! You two are way off kilter. lol

By: Montanaguy

Montanaguy — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:33:47 +0000

Paddy-O and ‘J’
Can I suggest a duel? Midnight at the bullring. Bring dayglo dart guns and whatever KoolAid you both drink.
Fusion and I will moderate. We’re fair and balanced.

“Calmer than you are…”

By: J

Sat, 20 Sep 2008 02:24:56 +0000

# 52 Paddy-O

“Nothing about “right wing” anything.”

It originated from Michelle Malkin and like I said the only blogs talking about are the right wing ones and they all seem to point right back to Michelle Malkin.

Feel free to post a link to a liberal blog that discusses it as if it were fact or that don’t lead back to a right wing blog. I can post 25 or more that are Right Wing blogs.

You are one of the reasons I don’t like most Republicans. You lie and do deceitful things right out in the open. When confronted about it you either lie some more or you try to deny them as if it never happened.

By: Montanaguy

Montanaguy — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:39:45 +0000

Calmer than you are.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:36:12 +0000

#49 ““David, who is being widely named on Internet blogs …”

Nothing about “right wing” anything.

Fail

By: deowll

deowll — Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:33:56 +0000

To the person that said Tee Hee. I hope you get the same treatment.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:57:01 +0000

Cow-Paddy,

Instead of rebutting your obviously incorrect claim, I have to confess. “J” did an excellent job of destroying you. You just don’t know when to quit.

To add, my checking showed that only right wing blogs were carrying the story. The Washington Times, one of the most right wing nut newspapers in America called the story a hoax.

You claimed it, you were wrong, now please sit down and be quiet.

By: J

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:53:11 +0000

# 48 Paddy-O

“Sure do.”

No you don’t because you asked. “The two links I provided are from right wing blogs?”

What does that have to do with where the story originated from?

Why provide a duplicate link when I can just quote your link?

“David, who is being widely named on Internet blogs and chatrooms in connection with an unfolding story about Palin’s hacked e-mail ”

THAT IS THE SOLE SOURCE FOR THEIR STORY!!!

Hum I don’t know about you but I can’t find any liberal blogs that have named him as the suspect. Yet there are tons of Right wing blogs that have.

Now lets be clear. At this point, THE SECRET SERVICE AND FBI HAVE NOT NAMED ANYONE!!!!!!! nor have they spoken with either David or his father yet. They may but something tells me that it was all a Right Wing wet dream.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:23:14 +0000

#47 “Do you understand the meaning of the word “originates”?”

Sure do. Do you understand backing up your argument? Links?

LOL

By: J

Fri, 19 Sep 2008 21:20:29 +0000

# 46 Paddy-O

“The two links I provided are from right wing blogs? Are you illiterate, or do you just not read what is posted?”

Perhaps you you are the illiterate one. Do you understand the meaning of the word “originates”?

All the info they are using did not come from the FBI or Secret Service. It is directly traceable back to right wing bloggers website.