<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 year old boy exercises 2nd amendment right to bear arms, shoots himself in the head with an Uzi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whysomangry</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1562273</link>
		<dc:creator>Whysomangry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1562273</guid>
		<description>BOOM HEADSHOT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOOM HEADSHOT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ubik</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394689</link>
		<dc:creator>ubik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394689</guid>
		<description>It is a small detail, but is the picture used in illustration to the post really the picture of an Uzi ?
It looks more like an Ingram to me, the smaller version of the Ingram sub-machine gun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a small detail, but is the picture used in illustration to the post really the picture of an Uzi ?<br />
It looks more like an Ingram to me, the smaller version of the Ingram sub-machine gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394569</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394569</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah. When we all have automatic weapons strapped to our waists, we&#039;ll all be totally safe at last. Except for all the accidental discharges. There&#039;s a big difference between the right to bear arms, and the right bear arms that can spray lead all day. The founding fathers came up with this amendment, back when it took five minutes to reload a single shot. And there were no police forces then either. Most farmers were lucky to own a single flintlock, in their entire life. I&#039;m sure that if they had envisioned guns like the Uzi, they&#039;d have added some caveats to that right. And there certainly are already restrictions against citizens owning things like bazookas, rocket launchers, nuclear weapons, and yes many types of military automatic weapons. 

Considering how little a gun is actually of much use to most citizens. It&#039;s strange that this one amendment is fought over so much. While the right to own a car or a computer, isn&#039;t in the Constitution as yet. I guess those are still considered as a luxury. But urban sprawl has spread the population out so much, that the need for a gun is far behind having a car to get food or go to one&#039;s job. Or a computer to communicate with the world. Let&#039;s face it, there is a lot about the US Constitution that&#039;s way out of date. And the 2nd Amendment seems to be one that fanatics would kill over, to protect its obscure and outdated wordage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah. When we all have automatic weapons strapped to our waists, we&#8217;ll all be totally safe at last. Except for all the accidental discharges. There&#8217;s a big difference between the right to bear arms, and the right bear arms that can spray lead all day. The founding fathers came up with this amendment, back when it took five minutes to reload a single shot. And there were no police forces then either. Most farmers were lucky to own a single flintlock, in their entire life. I&#8217;m sure that if they had envisioned guns like the Uzi, they&#8217;d have added some caveats to that right. And there certainly are already restrictions against citizens owning things like bazookas, rocket launchers, nuclear weapons, and yes many types of military automatic weapons. </p>
<p>Considering how little a gun is actually of much use to most citizens. It&#8217;s strange that this one amendment is fought over so much. While the right to own a car or a computer, isn&#8217;t in the Constitution as yet. I guess those are still considered as a luxury. But urban sprawl has spread the population out so much, that the need for a gun is far behind having a car to get food or go to one&#8217;s job. Or a computer to communicate with the world. Let&#8217;s face it, there is a lot about the US Constitution that&#8217;s way out of date. And the 2nd Amendment seems to be one that fanatics would kill over, to protect its obscure and outdated wordage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394555</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394555</guid>
		<description>#68
&gt; guns are DESIGNED with 
&gt; the express purpose of 
&gt; killing people.

Not true. Looking past hunting and target shooting, have you heard of the phrase &quot;stopping power&quot;? Many guns are designed to halt your assailant&#039;s progress towards you. The 45 automatic comes to mind. In addition, many military weapons are actually designed to injure more than kill as caring for the wounded expends more resources than caring for the dead. 

One person generally cannot defend themselves against a rogue government bent on tyranny however millions of people can. Trying to pacify an armed populace that is dedicated to your destruction can be incredibly costly. See Iraq.

The child killing themselves was of course tragic. However, the root cause is education. I think we should mandate more gun ownership *in addition* to (much) more gun training.


#100
Actually, kids can splice genes now. It is called grafting (well and procreation of course ;-&gt;).

#104
&gt; Actually, they were just 
&gt; too cheap to keep much of 
&gt; a standing Army or Navy.

You were doing fine right up until that statement. Money was only a secondary issue. Many of the Founding Fathers, most especially Jefferson, opposed a standing Army on principle because of the temptation of leaders to use it to impose their will on the populace much as recent monarchies had done (and Napoleon would later do). The cost savings was a bonus consequence.


&gt; Often it was proclaimed 
&gt; that for every German killed 
&gt; by the resistance, the Germans 
&gt; would kill 10, 20 or 100 civilians. 
&gt; Those pea shooters didn’t help them much.

I don&#039;t buy that statistic. That does not account for the numerous military operations that we made possible or substantially more successful by the efforts of the resistance. If anything Germany&#039;s victory over France in WW2 proves that they did not expend nearly enough effort in arming their population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#68<br />
&gt; guns are DESIGNED with<br />
&gt; the express purpose of<br />
&gt; killing people.</p>
<p>Not true. Looking past hunting and target shooting, have you heard of the phrase &#8220;stopping power&#8221;? Many guns are designed to halt your assailant&#8217;s progress towards you. The 45 automatic comes to mind. In addition, many military weapons are actually designed to injure more than kill as caring for the wounded expends more resources than caring for the dead. </p>
<p>One person generally cannot defend themselves against a rogue government bent on tyranny however millions of people can. Trying to pacify an armed populace that is dedicated to your destruction can be incredibly costly. See Iraq.</p>
<p>The child killing themselves was of course tragic. However, the root cause is education. I think we should mandate more gun ownership *in addition* to (much) more gun training.</p>
<p>#100<br />
Actually, kids can splice genes now. It is called grafting (well and procreation of course ;-&gt;).</p>
<p>#104<br />
&gt; Actually, they were just<br />
&gt; too cheap to keep much of<br />
&gt; a standing Army or Navy.</p>
<p>You were doing fine right up until that statement. Money was only a secondary issue. Many of the Founding Fathers, most especially Jefferson, opposed a standing Army on principle because of the temptation of leaders to use it to impose their will on the populace much as recent monarchies had done (and Napoleon would later do). The cost savings was a bonus consequence.</p>
<p>&gt; Often it was proclaimed<br />
&gt; that for every German killed<br />
&gt; by the resistance, the Germans<br />
&gt; would kill 10, 20 or 100 civilians.<br />
&gt; Those pea shooters didn’t help them much.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy that statistic. That does not account for the numerous military operations that we made possible or substantially more successful by the efforts of the resistance. If anything Germany&#8217;s victory over France in WW2 proves that they did not expend nearly enough effort in arming their population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRAGaLOT</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394462</link>
		<dc:creator>FRAGaLOT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394462</guid>
		<description>#6
The reason to have a powerful weapon like this is because all the criminals have them already. Banning a gun for whatever reason is stupid because criminals, by DEFINITION, do not obey banning laws, so what&#039;s the point?

Killing people is already against the law, dosen&#039;t matter if you use a uzi to kill the person, or a baseball bat.

Banning is just a knee-jerk reaction in response to some tragic event that could have been avoided if the people involved weren&#039;t fucking morons. Banning what they USED during that moment dosen&#039;t do jack shit, otherwise we wouldn&#039;t have so much crime anymore would we?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6<br />
The reason to have a powerful weapon like this is because all the criminals have them already. Banning a gun for whatever reason is stupid because criminals, by DEFINITION, do not obey banning laws, so what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>Killing people is already against the law, dosen&#8217;t matter if you use a uzi to kill the person, or a baseball bat.</p>
<p>Banning is just a knee-jerk reaction in response to some tragic event that could have been avoided if the people involved weren&#8217;t fucking morons. Banning what they USED during that moment dosen&#8217;t do jack shit, otherwise we wouldn&#8217;t have so much crime anymore would we?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ah_Yea</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ah_Yea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394451</guid>
		<description>#110 Mr. Fusion.

You got it!

I feel the same way.  I greatly admire your thoughts and enjoy our debates!

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#110 Mr. Fusion.</p>
<p>You got it!</p>
<p>I feel the same way.  I greatly admire your thoughts and enjoy our debates!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394386</link>
		<dc:creator>Buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394386</guid>
		<description>People don&#039;t kill people. People&#039;s tools kill people.

Except in extremely violent personal attacks by hand. Rare those, comparatively.

Of course guns kill people. Knives, screwdrivers and pencils do, too.

There is probably a case already in which somebody bludgeoned someone to death with an iPhone. One of the metal ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don&#8217;t kill people. People&#8217;s tools kill people.</p>
<p>Except in extremely violent personal attacks by hand. Rare those, comparatively.</p>
<p>Of course guns kill people. Knives, screwdrivers and pencils do, too.</p>
<p>There is probably a case already in which somebody bludgeoned someone to death with an iPhone. One of the metal ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394381</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394381</guid>
		<description>I know almost nothing about firearms but I know lots/most people get &quot;scope eye&quot; shooting a high powered rifle the first time.

A competent instructor would guard against scope eye for the very first time shooter.

Seems to me that this uzi was set to automatic fire (thought that was illegal as on this blog it has been reported people have been arrested for automatic firing weapons at ranges?) which any  expert should know would &quot;walk the weapon up&quot;  ((or are uzi&#039;s known for firing straight?)).  

Anyhow, seems like the range instructor if not the parent should have known about weapon creep and guarded against it for the first time user==ADULT OR CHILD.

What kind of &quot;expertise&quot; do you have if you act just like an idiot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know almost nothing about firearms but I know lots/most people get &#8220;scope eye&#8221; shooting a high powered rifle the first time.</p>
<p>A competent instructor would guard against scope eye for the very first time shooter.</p>
<p>Seems to me that this uzi was set to automatic fire (thought that was illegal as on this blog it has been reported people have been arrested for automatic firing weapons at ranges?) which any  expert should know would &#8220;walk the weapon up&#8221;  ((or are uzi&#8217;s known for firing straight?)).  </p>
<p>Anyhow, seems like the range instructor if not the parent should have known about weapon creep and guarded against it for the first time user==ADULT OR CHILD.</p>
<p>What kind of &#8220;expertise&#8221; do you have if you act just like an idiot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394378</guid>
		<description>#105, Ah Yea,

I think you and I disagree over some small points and have gotten way off track. Could we save this for another day?

You are one of the few I can disagree with and still feel clean. The problem is tonight I am just up to a serious mental battle. And damn it, you always make me think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#105, Ah Yea,</p>
<p>I think you and I disagree over some small points and have gotten way off track. Could we save this for another day?</p>
<p>You are one of the few I can disagree with and still feel clean. The problem is tonight I am just up to a serious mental battle. And damn it, you always make me think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clancys_daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394376</link>
		<dc:creator>clancys_daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394376</guid>
		<description>Not to discuss the legality of gun ownership.  
The purpose of a fire arm of any type is to fire a projectile.  The direction that it is pointed and the intent of the person firing it determines its secondary purpose.  Point it at an animal and its for hunting, point it at a piece of paper and its target shooting, at a person its purpose becomes to deter, intimidate, wound or kill that person. This took place at a legal shooting event, with a certified firearms instructor.  The father was behind his son bracing  and supporting him.  basic point it was an accident.  Would I let my kids at that age fire an automatic? nope but that&#039;s me and I cannot speak for some one else. Sympathy yes pity no, teaching tool definitely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to discuss the legality of gun ownership.<br />
The purpose of a fire arm of any type is to fire a projectile.  The direction that it is pointed and the intent of the person firing it determines its secondary purpose.  Point it at an animal and its for hunting, point it at a piece of paper and its target shooting, at a person its purpose becomes to deter, intimidate, wound or kill that person. This took place at a legal shooting event, with a certified firearms instructor.  The father was behind his son bracing  and supporting him.  basic point it was an accident.  Would I let my kids at that age fire an automatic? nope but that&#8217;s me and I cannot speak for some one else. Sympathy yes pity no, teaching tool definitely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sargasso</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394372</link>
		<dc:creator>sargasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394372</guid>
		<description>Plenty of Palestinian 8 year old kids get shot in the head with Uzis, but not as unintended victims of target practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plenty of Palestinian 8 year old kids get shot in the head with Uzis, but not as unintended victims of target practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394274</link>
		<dc:creator>No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394274</guid>
		<description>Go USA!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go USA!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Monster's Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394268</link>
		<dc:creator>The Monster's Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394268</guid>
		<description>#104 Fusion - But they always have a happy ending. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#104 Fusion &#8211; But they always have a happy ending. <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ah_Yea</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ah_Yea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394264</guid>
		<description>Fusion,

Another hint: Look up the foundation of the PLO, and observe that it was in fact an extension of the Husseini clan.  That in fact the PLO was one of the many &quot;Palestinian nationalist groups&quot; that the Husseini clan founded, and grew to prominence under Arafat, a Husseini.

I know it wouldn&#039;t surprise you to discover the PLO was mostly an organization devoted to empowering the Husseini Clan.  They were cut out of the goods when the Ottoman Empire was divided and are still trying to get their piece, and they are willing to sacrifice anyone to get what they want.

Therefore the intifada&#039;s, etc.  

No surprise here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fusion,</p>
<p>Another hint: Look up the foundation of the PLO, and observe that it was in fact an extension of the Husseini clan.  That in fact the PLO was one of the many &#8220;Palestinian nationalist groups&#8221; that the Husseini clan founded, and grew to prominence under Arafat, a Husseini.</p>
<p>I know it wouldn&#8217;t surprise you to discover the PLO was mostly an organization devoted to empowering the Husseini Clan.  They were cut out of the goods when the Ottoman Empire was divided and are still trying to get their piece, and they are willing to sacrifice anyone to get what they want.</p>
<p>Therefore the intifada&#8217;s, etc.  </p>
<p>No surprise here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/10/27/8-year-old-boy-exercises-2nd-amendment-right-to-bear-arms-shoots-himself-in-the-head-with-an-uzi/comment-page-6/#comment-1394262</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=29253#comment-1394262</guid>
		<description>#70, Derik,

Another ignorant idiot who got their history watching the Disney Channel.

&lt;i&gt;Remember, America was founded by ordinary citizens resisting their government. &lt;/i&gt;

No it wasn&#039;t. It was fought by the gentry who didn&#039;t like being oppressed by the British. That includes Land Owners, trades people, merchants, speculators, and slave owners. Ordinary farmers were better off under the British and had little issue. Only about 1/3 of the colonists supported the revolution. When the Constitution was written, it was written by those who controlled the legislatures, the rich, not the people.

&lt;i&gt;Our founders wisely knew this would be needed again and made provisions for it. &lt;/i&gt;

Actually, they were just too cheap to keep much of a standing Army or Navy.

&lt;i&gt;Europeans who think that military arms have no business in the hands of citizens are naive. Does Hitler ring a bell? How about the Soviets? The French citizenry fighting the occupiers in WWII were sure glad they had arms, weren’t they? &lt;/i&gt;

The German armies over ran every army and country that got in it&#039;s face until 1943. I guess you haven&#039;t heard of the “partisans”, underground, or resistance fighters. Often it was proclaimed that for every German killed by the resistance, the Germans would kill 10, 20 or 100 civilians. Those pea shooters didn&#039;t help them much.

&lt;i&gt;You’d think the British could’ve warned them. They have experience with those sorts of things (India). &lt;/i&gt;

The US had its own little experience with guerrilla warfare. Maybe you&#039;ve heard of a place called the Philippines, or Lebanon, or Israel. Damn I wish you people would stop getting your history from Old Disney cartoons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#70, Derik,</p>
<p>Another ignorant idiot who got their history watching the Disney Channel.</p>
<p><i>Remember, America was founded by ordinary citizens resisting their government. </i></p>
<p>No it wasn&#8217;t. It was fought by the gentry who didn&#8217;t like being oppressed by the British. That includes Land Owners, trades people, merchants, speculators, and slave owners. Ordinary farmers were better off under the British and had little issue. Only about 1/3 of the colonists supported the revolution. When the Constitution was written, it was written by those who controlled the legislatures, the rich, not the people.</p>
<p><i>Our founders wisely knew this would be needed again and made provisions for it. </i></p>
<p>Actually, they were just too cheap to keep much of a standing Army or Navy.</p>
<p><i>Europeans who think that military arms have no business in the hands of citizens are naive. Does Hitler ring a bell? How about the Soviets? The French citizenry fighting the occupiers in WWII were sure glad they had arms, weren’t they? </i></p>
<p>The German armies over ran every army and country that got in it&#8217;s face until 1943. I guess you haven&#8217;t heard of the “partisans”, underground, or resistance fighters. Often it was proclaimed that for every German killed by the resistance, the Germans would kill 10, 20 or 100 civilians. Those pea shooters didn&#8217;t help them much.</p>
<p><i>You’d think the British could’ve warned them. They have experience with those sorts of things (India). </i></p>
<p>The US had its own little experience with guerrilla warfare. Maybe you&#8217;ve heard of a place called the Philippines, or Lebanon, or Israel. Damn I wish you people would stop getting your history from Old Disney cartoons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

