<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 13 countries in the &#8220;Coalition of the Willing&#8221; leaving Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:40:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434622</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434622</guid>
		<description>#24--Paddy-O==well done.  You actually referred to an objective source.

Chickenhawk:  [A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.]

Now, I still think Bushieboy is a chickenhawk and Clinton/Obama are not.  Doesn&#039;t seem to fit the definition by which I agree to be bound.

Well, perhaps the key word here is &quot;favors.&quot;   Did Clinton/will Obama, favor other action before resorting to military action?  I think so. 

Was Bush a chickenhawk?  Most certainly, on two levels.  One, the worst kind of chickenhawk is one who shirks military duty while enlisted and then goes on to send other military to their death.  A Super-Chicken Hypocrite-Hawk if  you will.

Second, we all know Bushieboy is just a meatpuppet for Cheney, who again, all agree is a Chickenhawk.

Ambiguity resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24&#8211;Paddy-O==well done.  You actually referred to an objective source.</p>
<p>Chickenhawk:  [A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.]</p>
<p>Now, I still think Bushieboy is a chickenhawk and Clinton/Obama are not.  Doesn&#8217;t seem to fit the definition by which I agree to be bound.</p>
<p>Well, perhaps the key word here is &#8220;favors.&#8221;   Did Clinton/will Obama, favor other action before resorting to military action?  I think so. </p>
<p>Was Bush a chickenhawk?  Most certainly, on two levels.  One, the worst kind of chickenhawk is one who shirks military duty while enlisted and then goes on to send other military to their death.  A Super-Chicken Hypocrite-Hawk if  you will.</p>
<p>Second, we all know Bushieboy is just a meatpuppet for Cheney, who again, all agree is a Chickenhawk.</p>
<p>Ambiguity resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434621</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434621</guid>
		<description># 29 Mister Mustard said, &quot;Of all the things President Clinton and President-Elect Obama might be called, “retarded” is not one of them.&quot;

I consider any chickedhawk as somewhat retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 29 Mister Mustard said, &#8220;Of all the things President Clinton and President-Elect Obama might be called, “retarded” is not one of them.&#8221;</p>
<p>I consider any chickedhawk as somewhat retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434603</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434603</guid>
		<description>#28 - Paddy-RAMBO

Now I KNOW yer jes&#039; funnin&#039; me.  Of all the things President Clinton and President-Elect Obama might be called, &quot;retarded&quot; is not one of them.

And a Bushbaby like yourself referring to ANYONE as &quot;retarded&quot;??  Now that&#039;s a big hearty belly-LOL!  &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;LOL!!!&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.

Give it up, Paddy-Rambo.  Go back to playing with the remote-controlled cars, and maybe the Repugs can dig up somebody who&#039;s not a felon or terminally stupid to run for office in 2016.  

And if not, hey, look at all the fun you will have had playing with those cars for 8 years.  They&#039;re kewl!  That will be a Mission Accomplished in and of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>Now I KNOW yer jes&#8217; funnin&#8217; me.  Of all the things President Clinton and President-Elect Obama might be called, &#8220;retarded&#8221; is not one of them.</p>
<p>And a Bushbaby like yourself referring to ANYONE as &#8220;retarded&#8221;??  Now that&#8217;s a big hearty belly-LOL!  <i><b>LOL!!!</b></i>.</p>
<p>Give it up, Paddy-Rambo.  Go back to playing with the remote-controlled cars, and maybe the Repugs can dig up somebody who&#8217;s not a felon or terminally stupid to run for office in 2016.  </p>
<p>And if not, hey, look at all the fun you will have had playing with those cars for 8 years.  They&#8217;re kewl!  That will be a Mission Accomplished in and of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434600</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434600</guid>
		<description># 27 Mister Mustard said,  &quot;Kind of ironic (LOL) that a guy named RAMBO would love chickenhawks (LOLOLOLOL), but you obviously do.&quot;

Hey, no matter how retarded, ya gotta like Clinton &amp; Omama.  Chickenhawks are people too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 27 Mister Mustard said,  &#8220;Kind of ironic (LOL) that a guy named RAMBO would love chickenhawks (LOLOLOLOL), but you obviously do.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, no matter how retarded, ya gotta like Clinton &amp; Omama.  Chickenhawks are people too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434594</guid>
		<description>#26 - Paddy-RAMBO

&gt;&gt;Got t love them chickenhawks. LOL

Kind of ironic (LOL) that a guy named RAMBO would love chickenhawks (LOLOLOLOL), but you obviously do.

There&#039;s no other explanation for your continued fawning over the worst president in the history of the republic (apparently solely on the basis of his chickenhawkdom, which is all he&#039;s ever been successful at), and your desire to big-tent the chickenhawk category to include others that no one else ever thinks to include.

LOL. ROTFLMAO!  LOLOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#26 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Got t love them chickenhawks. LOL</p>
<p>Kind of ironic (LOL) that a guy named RAMBO would love chickenhawks (LOLOLOLOL), but you obviously do.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no other explanation for your continued fawning over the worst president in the history of the republic (apparently solely on the basis of his chickenhawkdom, which is all he&#8217;s ever been successful at), and your desire to big-tent the chickenhawk category to include others that no one else ever thinks to include.</p>
<p>LOL. ROTFLMAO!  LOLOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434591</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434591</guid>
		<description># 25 Mister Mustard said, &quot;You don’t have to be a card-carrying anti-war pacifist to escape the “chickenhawk” moniker. Sometimes war (or “bombing”) is the only option.&quot;

Yep, for chickenhawks with a hammer, every problem is a nail. 

I&#039;m glad we had NO choice but to bomb Yugoslavia.

[2000] &quot;About five hundred civilians died in ninety separate incidents as a result of NATO bombing in Yugoslavia last year.&quot; 

Got t love them chickenhawks.  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 25 Mister Mustard said, &#8220;You don’t have to be a card-carrying anti-war pacifist to escape the “chickenhawk” moniker. Sometimes war (or “bombing”) is the only option.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep, for chickenhawks with a hammer, every problem is a nail. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we had NO choice but to bomb Yugoslavia.</p>
<p>[2000] &#8220;About five hundred civilians died in ninety separate incidents as a result of NATO bombing in Yugoslavia last year.&#8221; </p>
<p>Got t love them chickenhawks.  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434585</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434585</guid>
		<description>#24 - Paddy-RAMBO

You don&#039;t have to be a card-carrying anti-war pacifist to escape the &quot;chickenhawk&quot; moniker.  Sometimes war (or &quot;bombing&quot;) is the only option.

In Dumbya&#039;s case, after his ignominious &quot;military&quot; serverice (which was servering his country to about the same degree as clearing brush from his Crawford &quot;ranch&quot; servers his country), he declared a unilateral &lt;i&gt;invasion&lt;/i&gt; of a sovereign nation on false pretenses; pretenses that he knew (or should have known, if he was sober more than half the time) were cooked up for the purpose of feeding his war-hunger.

As a result, 4000+ Americans have died, and somewhere between 500,000 and 1,000,000 other have died, all in the cause of nurturing his Oedipus complex.

Mission Accomplished?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to be a card-carrying anti-war pacifist to escape the &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221; moniker.  Sometimes war (or &#8220;bombing&#8221;) is the only option.</p>
<p>In Dumbya&#8217;s case, after his ignominious &#8220;military&#8221; serverice (which was servering his country to about the same degree as clearing brush from his Crawford &#8220;ranch&#8221; servers his country), he declared a unilateral <i>invasion</i> of a sovereign nation on false pretenses; pretenses that he knew (or should have known, if he was sober more than half the time) were cooked up for the purpose of feeding his war-hunger.</p>
<p>As a result, 4000+ Americans have died, and somewhere between 500,000 and 1,000,000 other have died, all in the cause of nurturing his Oedipus complex.</p>
<p>Mission Accomplished?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434570</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434570</guid>
		<description># 23 Mister Mustard said, &quot;They didn’t server in any branch&quot;

[A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.]

Okay.  Clinton used the military to attack countries who weren&#039;t at war with us.  Obama has stated he would bomb Pakistan &amp; increase the war in Afghanistan. 

Chickenhawks ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 23 Mister Mustard said, &#8220;They didn’t server in any branch&#8221;</p>
<p>[A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.]</p>
<p>Okay.  Clinton used the military to attack countries who weren&#8217;t at war with us.  Obama has stated he would bomb Pakistan &amp; increase the war in Afghanistan. </p>
<p>Chickenhawks &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434564</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434564</guid>
		<description>@22 - Paddy-RAMBO

&gt;&gt;So, what branch of the military did Clinton &amp; &gt;&gt;Obama server in?

They didn&#039;t server in any branch, Paddy-RAMBO. Of course, they didn&#039;t get Poppy to get them a plum position flying geraniums from nursing home to nursing home during the Viet Nam war to take the place of their &quot;military&quot; serverice, go AWOL even from THAT cushy job, and then come into office breathing fire and pawing the floor in their eagerness to start a war that somebody ELSE would fight.

You DO know the definition of &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;chickenhawk&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, right?  Out of the three, only Dumbya (and many members of his administration) qualify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;So, what branch of the military did Clinton &amp; &gt;&gt;Obama server in?</p>
<p>They didn&#8217;t server in any branch, Paddy-RAMBO. Of course, they didn&#8217;t get Poppy to get them a plum position flying geraniums from nursing home to nursing home during the Viet Nam war to take the place of their &#8220;military&#8221; serverice, go AWOL even from THAT cushy job, and then come into office breathing fire and pawing the floor in their eagerness to start a war that somebody ELSE would fight.</p>
<p>You DO know the definition of <b><i>chickenhawk</i></b>, right?  Out of the three, only Dumbya (and many members of his administration) qualify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434556</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434556</guid>
		<description># 21 Mister Mustard said, &quot;Paddy-RAMBO, you must work really hard to come up with things as idiotic as the things you say.&quot;

So, what branch of the military did Clinton &amp; Obama server in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 21 Mister Mustard said, &#8220;Paddy-RAMBO, you must work really hard to come up with things as idiotic as the things you say.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, what branch of the military did Clinton &amp; Obama server in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-2/#comment-1434358</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434358</guid>
		<description>#19 - Paddy-RAMBO

&gt;&gt;So, come Jan 20, the only chickenhawks to 
&gt;&gt;occupy the White House in the last 50 years 
&gt;&gt;will have been Clinton &amp; Obama. Prior to that 
&gt;&gt;it was FDR.

Paddy-RAMBO, you must work really hard to come up with things as idiotic as the things you say. Clinton and Obama as chickenhawks. Sheesh. I can&#039;t believe that sort of moronic arrested development comes natural to ANYONE.  Do you have a staff of writers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;So, come Jan 20, the only chickenhawks to<br />
&gt;&gt;occupy the White House in the last 50 years<br />
&gt;&gt;will have been Clinton &amp; Obama. Prior to that<br />
&gt;&gt;it was FDR.</p>
<p>Paddy-RAMBO, you must work really hard to come up with things as idiotic as the things you say. Clinton and Obama as chickenhawks. Sheesh. I can&#8217;t believe that sort of moronic arrested development comes natural to ANYONE.  Do you have a staff of writers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-1434351</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434351</guid>
		<description>#18 - LL

I&#039;m familiar with the definition of &quot;chickenhawk&quot;.  There have been so many in Dumbya&#039;s administration, it&#039;s hard not to be.

And while draft dodging isn&#039;t a necessary prerequisite for chickenhawkdom, many of the supporters and members of Dumbya&#039;s administration have gone that &quot;extra mile&quot; my no only never having had been in combat, but by having gone to extreme lengths not to have done so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#18 &#8211; LL</p>
<p>I&#8217;m familiar with the definition of &#8220;chickenhawk&#8221;.  There have been so many in Dumbya&#8217;s administration, it&#8217;s hard not to be.</p>
<p>And while draft dodging isn&#8217;t a necessary prerequisite for chickenhawkdom, many of the supporters and members of Dumbya&#8217;s administration have gone that &#8220;extra mile&#8221; my no only never having had been in combat, but by having gone to extreme lengths not to have done so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-1434331</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434331</guid>
		<description># 18 LibertyLover said, &quot;the true definition of chickenhawk is

A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.&quot;

So, come Jan 20, the only chickenhawks to occupy the White House in the last 50 years will have been Clinton &amp; Obama.  Prior to that it was FDR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 18 LibertyLover said, &#8220;the true definition of chickenhawk is</p>
<p>A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, come Jan 20, the only chickenhawks to occupy the White House in the last 50 years will have been Clinton &amp; Obama.  Prior to that it was FDR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertyLover</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-1434302</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertyLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1434302</guid>
		<description>#17, But that&#039;s not what he said.  He said regardless of who is elected president.  Regardless.

btw . . . the true definition of chickenhawk is 

&lt;b&gt;A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.&lt;/b&gt;

Draft dodging has no bearing.

http://tinyurl.com/6quvfr

http://tinyurl.com/56ytwu

&lt;i&gt;continuing to spend us into bankruptcy”. WTF do you think we have right now?&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s why I said &quot;continuing,&quot; not &quot;starting.&quot;  He is going to continue the last administration&#039;s policy of foreign aggression and increasing the size of government.  

He could save the country how much money by pulling us out of Irag?  The Iragi government just recently got hammered by our state dept into accepting an ongoing presence when they really didn&#039;t want us there anymore.  He should pull us out.

But I guess it&#039;s ok because we&#039;ve doubled our money supply so we should have plenty of money to spend on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#17, But that&#8217;s not what he said.  He said regardless of who is elected president.  Regardless.</p>
<p>btw . . . the true definition of chickenhawk is </p>
<p><b>A person who favors military force or action to carry out a foreign policy but has never served in the military.</b></p>
<p>Draft dodging has no bearing.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6quvfr" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/6quvfr' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/6quvfr</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/56ytwu" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/56ytwu' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/56ytwu</a></p>
<p><i>continuing to spend us into bankruptcy”. WTF do you think we have right now?</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I said &#8220;continuing,&#8221; not &#8220;starting.&#8221;  He is going to continue the last administration&#8217;s policy of foreign aggression and increasing the size of government.  </p>
<p>He could save the country how much money by pulling us out of Irag?  The Iragi government just recently got hammered by our state dept into accepting an ongoing presence when they really didn&#8217;t want us there anymore.  He should pull us out.</p>
<p>But I guess it&#8217;s ok because we&#8217;ve doubled our money supply so we should have plenty of money to spend on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/11/30/13-countries-in-the-coalition-of-the-willing-leaving-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-1433954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=32504#comment-1433954</guid>
		<description>#16 - LL

&gt;&gt;Methinks Gates has started touting the party 
&gt;&gt;line to keep his job. 

Not likely.  He said before he didn&#039;t expect to keep his job and didn&#039;t want to keep his job.  He&#039;s got enough other irons in the fire, and there&#039;s just no way Dumbya&#039;s abortion-war is going to end well, I don&#039;t know why he even wants the job.

&gt;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/4gemb6

He said that back when (at least some people thought) McBush had a chance to win the election.  If he HAD won, we&#039;d be there for 100 years.

&gt;&gt;This is going to turn out to be a 
&gt;&gt;chickenhawk administration continuing to 
&gt;&gt;spend us into bankruptcy.

Uh, you have to be a warmonger (AND a draft dodger) to be a chickenhawk.  Dumbya (and most of his administration) qualifies in spades; Obama does not.

And oh, the bitter irony of you calling Obama&#039;s administration &quot;chickenhawk, continuing to spend us into bankruptcy&quot;.  WTF do you think we have right now?  Obama is CHANGE, man!  

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Si, ¡¡se puede!!&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16 &#8211; LL</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;Methinks Gates has started touting the party<br />
&gt;&gt;line to keep his job. </p>
<p>Not likely.  He said before he didn&#8217;t expect to keep his job and didn&#8217;t want to keep his job.  He&#8217;s got enough other irons in the fire, and there&#8217;s just no way Dumbya&#8217;s abortion-war is going to end well, I don&#8217;t know why he even wants the job.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;<a href="http://tinyurl.com/4gemb6" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://tinyurl.com/4gemb6' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://tinyurl.com/4gemb6</a></p>
<p>He said that back when (at least some people thought) McBush had a chance to win the election.  If he HAD won, we&#8217;d be there for 100 years.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;This is going to turn out to be a<br />
&gt;&gt;chickenhawk administration continuing to<br />
&gt;&gt;spend us into bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Uh, you have to be a warmonger (AND a draft dodger) to be a chickenhawk.  Dumbya (and most of his administration) qualifies in spades; Obama does not.</p>
<p>And oh, the bitter irony of you calling Obama&#8217;s administration &#8220;chickenhawk, continuing to spend us into bankruptcy&#8221;.  WTF do you think we have right now?  Obama is CHANGE, man!  </p>
<p><b><i>Si, ¡¡se puede!!</i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

