Thanks Mr Mustard for making my point. Always great to hear from the tolerant, free speech crowd that is todays liberal. You can go back to spewing your hate.
That you have a fixation on old lesbians and little “straight” boys?
That you have an unhealthy obsession with World “News” Daily, the most laughable piece of yellow journalism to ever desecrate the First Amendment?
That like so many guys who bellow the loudest and most angrily about crimes against nature committed by the ass bandits and carpet munchers, you walk a very fine line with your own sexuality yourself?
The whole idea of those questions were to get the students to think. Anyone who with an education has experienced the process.
To castigate the thinking process because you disagree with the points you need to argue only demonstrates the intelligence of those complainer. The benefit of this process is that it will usually enlighten the person to some salient point that had not occurred before.
On the other hand, how can you denigrate a position if you don’t even understand it? Why criticize Marxism if you don’t even know what it is about? Or homosexuality, caviar, or Ford Fusions?
FuckUp might not know anything about caviar or Ford Fusions, but I have a sneaking suspicion that he knows a whole heck of a lot more about homosexuality than he’s letting on.
Nobody bellows that loud unless they have some intimate (heh heh) knowledge of the topic. Marxism, I’m not sure about.
#46, Mustard,
… Paddy-RAMBO is concerned that if civil rights are extended to same-sex couples, his wife will run away and marry a muff-muncher.
Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit … , practices bigamy. He is married to both hands and can switch hands without missing a beat !!!
Thanks Mr Mustard for making my point. Always great to hear from the tolerant, free speech crowd that is todays liberal. You can go back to spewing your hate.
#82 – FuckUp
>>Thanks Mr Mustard for making my point.
What point was that, ‘Up?
That you have a fixation on old lesbians and little “straight” boys?
That you have an unhealthy obsession with World “News” Daily, the most laughable piece of yellow journalism to ever desecrate the First Amendment?
That like so many guys who bellow the loudest and most angrily about crimes against nature committed by the ass bandits and carpet munchers, you walk a very fine line with your own sexuality yourself?
Tell me, won’t you?
Fukup,
The whole idea of those questions were to get the students to think. Anyone who with an education has experienced the process.
To castigate the thinking process because you disagree with the points you need to argue only demonstrates the intelligence of those complainer. The benefit of this process is that it will usually enlighten the person to some salient point that had not occurred before.
On the other hand, how can you denigrate a position if you don’t even understand it? Why criticize Marxism if you don’t even know what it is about? Or homosexuality, caviar, or Ford Fusions?
#84 – Mr. Fusion
FuckUp might not know anything about caviar or Ford Fusions, but I have a sneaking suspicion that he knows a whole heck of a lot more about homosexuality than he’s letting on.
Nobody bellows that loud unless they have some intimate (heh heh) knowledge of the topic. Marxism, I’m not sure about.