<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dvorak Poll: Should We Bailout The Car Companies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:19:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenskidusautoparts</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1467821</link>
		<dc:creator>greenskidusautoparts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1467821</guid>
		<description>Bailouts never solve anything. It makes problems worse, since businesses doesn’t have to adapt to survive, meaning that in a couple of years time the same situation will arise once more, most likely worse than now. And that isn’t specific for the auto industry, it applies to everything. Yes, a lot of people will lose their jobs, and no they won’t be saved by a bailout. Not in the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bailouts never solve anything. It makes problems worse, since businesses doesn’t have to adapt to survive, meaning that in a couple of years time the same situation will arise once more, most likely worse than now. And that isn’t specific for the auto industry, it applies to everything. Yes, a lot of people will lose their jobs, and no they won’t be saved by a bailout. Not in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soundwash</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446643</link>
		<dc:creator>soundwash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446643</guid>
		<description>if i may rear my ugly head up after some datamining
on the topic...

any corporation on line for a bailout should shown the door, period.

- as stated by others, bankruptcy gets all the bad/toxic debt off the balance sheets and allows the corp to start w/a clean slate. bailouts just ensure further pain down the line for the taxpayer.

-and since we&#039;re going to be &quot;killed off&quot; from hyperinflation and taxes next year anyway, might as well break out the pain stick early and let them bankrupt/cleanup, deal with the blow to the economy NOW, so we&#039;ll be that much more ahead of the next wave of crashes.

sadly, it looks like the car-bailout is just a little side show for us peons debate over and politicians to gloat/point fingers over. -it&#039;s going to happen, one way or the other. 
-otherwise the banks would lose even more, not to mention more loan fraud exposed in the way of car loans made to people that could never afford them.
(who the F is OKaying all these loans??)

-there is a reason the banks (Fed included) are never taken to task in front of congress or the public.

note this snippet from Bloomberg News as reported in August..
--
...&quot;A default by one of the automakers would trigger writedowns and losses in the $1.2 trillion market for collateralized debt obligations that pool derivatives linked to corporate debt… Credit-default swaps on GM and Ford were included in more than 80 percent of CDOs created before they lost their investment-grade debt rankings in 2005, according to data compiled by Standard &amp; Poor&#039;s.&quot; 
--

i think this means that those Auto CDO&#039;s are bundled in *the same* toxic securites/derivitives  held by the recently bailed out companies like fan-mae as moratge debt..

if you let those trigger, the losses in &quot;fake&quot;/synthetic CDOs will be huge.

-no doubt, it would result in more in-house bank-fraud being exposed, -before it&#039;s time, i&#039;m sure.

imo, all this &quot;political theater&quot; is merely to entertain and distract us while the guts of the illusion take place.

-anyway, the bailout will go through soon enough, esp since we have 2.99 houses of democrats applying major pressure to save their beloved union(s)

-s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if i may rear my ugly head up after some datamining<br />
on the topic&#8230;</p>
<p>any corporation on line for a bailout should shown the door, period.</p>
<p>- as stated by others, bankruptcy gets all the bad/toxic debt off the balance sheets and allows the corp to start w/a clean slate. bailouts just ensure further pain down the line for the taxpayer.</p>
<p>-and since we&#8217;re going to be &#8220;killed off&#8221; from hyperinflation and taxes next year anyway, might as well break out the pain stick early and let them bankrupt/cleanup, deal with the blow to the economy NOW, so we&#8217;ll be that much more ahead of the next wave of crashes.</p>
<p>sadly, it looks like the car-bailout is just a little side show for us peons debate over and politicians to gloat/point fingers over. -it&#8217;s going to happen, one way or the other.<br />
-otherwise the banks would lose even more, not to mention more loan fraud exposed in the way of car loans made to people that could never afford them.<br />
(who the F is OKaying all these loans??)</p>
<p>-there is a reason the banks (Fed included) are never taken to task in front of congress or the public.</p>
<p>note this snippet from Bloomberg News as reported in August..<br />
&#8211;<br />
&#8230;&#8221;A default by one of the automakers would trigger writedowns and losses in the $1.2 trillion market for collateralized debt obligations that pool derivatives linked to corporate debt… Credit-default swaps on GM and Ford were included in more than 80 percent of CDOs created before they lost their investment-grade debt rankings in 2005, according to data compiled by Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s.&#8221;<br />
&#8211;</p>
<p>i think this means that those Auto CDO&#8217;s are bundled in *the same* toxic securites/derivitives  held by the recently bailed out companies like fan-mae as moratge debt..</p>
<p>if you let those trigger, the losses in &#8220;fake&#8221;/synthetic CDOs will be huge.</p>
<p>-no doubt, it would result in more in-house bank-fraud being exposed, -before it&#8217;s time, i&#8217;m sure.</p>
<p>imo, all this &#8220;political theater&#8221; is merely to entertain and distract us while the guts of the illusion take place.</p>
<p>-anyway, the bailout will go through soon enough, esp since we have 2.99 houses of democrats applying major pressure to save their beloved union(s)</p>
<p>-s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446567</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446567</guid>
		<description># 65 David Dzidzikashvili said,  &quot;The Big 3 should not be bailed out,&quot;

Paulson will write them a check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 65 David Dzidzikashvili said,  &#8220;The Big 3 should not be bailed out,&#8221;</p>
<p>Paulson will write them a check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dzidzikashvili</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446561</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dzidzikashvili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446561</guid>
		<description>The Big 3 should not be bailed out, since they are putting the products on the market that people do not want to buy. Besides the Big 3 will need much more money to sustain themselves and this bailout won’t work, due to the companies short-term and long-term financial obligations that will create further troubles for the automakers in future. They will ask for more bailout next year and the year after….</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big 3 should not be bailed out, since they are putting the products on the market that people do not want to buy. Besides the Big 3 will need much more money to sustain themselves and this bailout won’t work, due to the companies short-term and long-term financial obligations that will create further troubles for the automakers in future. They will ask for more bailout next year and the year after….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446525</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446525</guid>
		<description>#62 - Paddy-RAMBO

&gt;&gt;if in the future you want to know what’s 
&gt;&gt;happening on the Hill, just ask. 

Come on, O&#039;Pinocchio.  You&#039;ve already been busted on that &quot;I mingle with the shakers and the movers&quot; scam. Totally busted.

Time to move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#62 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;if in the future you want to know what’s<br />
&gt;&gt;happening on the Hill, just ask. </p>
<p>Come on, O&#8217;Pinocchio.  You&#8217;ve already been busted on that &#8220;I mingle with the shakers and the movers&#8221; scam. Totally busted.</p>
<p>Time to move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deowll</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446514</link>
		<dc:creator>deowll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446514</guid>
		<description>Ya got two issues.

Almost nobody in my county makes the kind of money anyone in these companies in making. Expecting us to bail them out so they can keep on living a life style we&#039;ve never had is not going to fly with many of us.

The other thing is this is going to take more than money. 

If these guys can&#039;t come up with a business modal that works  a 100 trillion  dollars  isn&#039;t enough to keep them afloat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya got two issues.</p>
<p>Almost nobody in my county makes the kind of money anyone in these companies in making. Expecting us to bail them out so they can keep on living a life style we&#8217;ve never had is not going to fly with many of us.</p>
<p>The other thing is this is going to take more than money. </p>
<p>If these guys can&#8217;t come up with a business modal that works  a 100 trillion  dollars  isn&#8217;t enough to keep them afloat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446457</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446457</guid>
		<description># 35 Mr. Fusion said,  This just in, YOUR EFFEN WRONG.&quot;

Mr. CONfusion, if in the future you want to know what&#039;s happening on the Hill, just ask.  If I can tell you without violating confidentiality, I will.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/13/business/13auto.html?ref=business&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Senate Drops Automaker Bailout Bid&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 35 Mr. Fusion said,  This just in, YOUR EFFEN WRONG.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. CONfusion, if in the future you want to know what&#8217;s happening on the Hill, just ask.  If I can tell you without violating confidentiality, I will.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/13/business/13auto.html?ref=business" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Senate Drops Automaker Bailout Bid</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amodedoma</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-4/#comment-1446394</link>
		<dc:creator>amodedoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446394</guid>
		<description>#57 the idea was a cash rebate to stimulate sales, but there are other formulas.  It won&#039;t do any good to pump these companies up with taxpayer cash if they continue to have such low sales figures. It would only delay the inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#57 the idea was a cash rebate to stimulate sales, but there are other formulas.  It won&#8217;t do any good to pump these companies up with taxpayer cash if they continue to have such low sales figures. It would only delay the inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brendal</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446344</link>
		<dc:creator>brendal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446344</guid>
		<description>My bro had a long career as a design engineer at GM and was laid off 2 years ago, one month after receiving an employee commendation. Nice. Here&#039;s what he has to say:

&quot;In the time that I was at GM, all I ever heard was work harder and things will turn around. I, as well as a lot of other people (non management white collar), busted our tails in doing so only to see our medical insurance go up, our profit sharing reduced or disappear, cost of living adjustments taken away and raises disappear while the executives and UAW&#039;s (the UAW was never asked to sacrifice nor would they) did not.

&quot;Quality of the vehicles is not the issue here. We designed and engineered vehicles to be of the highest quality. However, sacrificing on the part of the executives and the UAW as we had, to get back market share by lowering the price of the vehicles, was out of the question as far as they were concerned. If they had, these companies would have been in line with their competitors in what they pay their workers and executives and could have beaten them in the market place. These two entities refused to do so and now they have to ask for help because of it.

&quot;I understand people&#039;s defense of these companies, but I was not laid off because of my excellent work performance - but because they had to lay people off and my name was picked. Yes, this was what I was told in my exit review. In other words, because I was not someone&#039;s relative or a suck up, I was let go. They always wanted to hear (upper management) that everything is great (the &#039;Emperor&#039;s New Clothes&#039; syndrome) and that the system is not broken, even though they knew it was.

&quot;I was in a meeting one time where they had people from different departments meet to come up with ideas to improve the profitability of the company. At that time, Ford was one year away from releasing the Mustang to the market. I suggested that we needed to bring the Camaro and Firebird back to compete with Ford and that would get market share back for us. I was belittled and told by the person who was running the meeting (who was a director) that we are GM and we are not desperate for market share. That was in 2004 and when I left that meeting, I realized that no matter what I did, the company was going to be in a world of hurt within 10 years and that I could do nothing to change it if this was the way that they treated their people. This meeting was nothing but a dog and pony show.

&quot;Another example is the apology that GM is spewing out about how they are sorry that the lied to the public about the quality of their vehicles and that they will do better in the future. This is the same crap, line for line, that they have put out twice before within the past 15 years when they were in trouble. When I started reading this statement the other day, I was half way through it when I realized that it was the exact statement that they had released through the media to the public twice before. I stopped reading it because I got upset over the fact that this bailout really is a con game on their part.

&quot;The executives of these companies and the UAW today are not the greatest generation like their forefathers, but the greediest generation, and the rest of us are going to have to pay for that greed.

&quot;In fact I wish Congress would of asked people like myself to go before them and weigh in on all of this. They should have forced all of these companies to file for Chapter 11. If they had done so, then the executives and the UAW would have had to really change. What they got is what they wanted and the changes that they will have to make will only be half hearted. And when the spotlight is off of them it will be business as usual.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bro had a long career as a design engineer at GM and was laid off 2 years ago, one month after receiving an employee commendation. Nice. Here&#8217;s what he has to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the time that I was at GM, all I ever heard was work harder and things will turn around. I, as well as a lot of other people (non management white collar), busted our tails in doing so only to see our medical insurance go up, our profit sharing reduced or disappear, cost of living adjustments taken away and raises disappear while the executives and UAW&#8217;s (the UAW was never asked to sacrifice nor would they) did not.</p>
<p>&#8220;Quality of the vehicles is not the issue here. We designed and engineered vehicles to be of the highest quality. However, sacrificing on the part of the executives and the UAW as we had, to get back market share by lowering the price of the vehicles, was out of the question as far as they were concerned. If they had, these companies would have been in line with their competitors in what they pay their workers and executives and could have beaten them in the market place. These two entities refused to do so and now they have to ask for help because of it.</p>
<p>&#8220;I understand people&#8217;s defense of these companies, but I was not laid off because of my excellent work performance &#8211; but because they had to lay people off and my name was picked. Yes, this was what I was told in my exit review. In other words, because I was not someone&#8217;s relative or a suck up, I was let go. They always wanted to hear (upper management) that everything is great (the &#8216;Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes&#8217; syndrome) and that the system is not broken, even though they knew it was.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was in a meeting one time where they had people from different departments meet to come up with ideas to improve the profitability of the company. At that time, Ford was one year away from releasing the Mustang to the market. I suggested that we needed to bring the Camaro and Firebird back to compete with Ford and that would get market share back for us. I was belittled and told by the person who was running the meeting (who was a director) that we are GM and we are not desperate for market share. That was in 2004 and when I left that meeting, I realized that no matter what I did, the company was going to be in a world of hurt within 10 years and that I could do nothing to change it if this was the way that they treated their people. This meeting was nothing but a dog and pony show.</p>
<p>&#8220;Another example is the apology that GM is spewing out about how they are sorry that the lied to the public about the quality of their vehicles and that they will do better in the future. This is the same crap, line for line, that they have put out twice before within the past 15 years when they were in trouble. When I started reading this statement the other day, I was half way through it when I realized that it was the exact statement that they had released through the media to the public twice before. I stopped reading it because I got upset over the fact that this bailout really is a con game on their part.</p>
<p>&#8220;The executives of these companies and the UAW today are not the greatest generation like their forefathers, but the greediest generation, and the rest of us are going to have to pay for that greed.</p>
<p>&#8220;In fact I wish Congress would of asked people like myself to go before them and weigh in on all of this. They should have forced all of these companies to file for Chapter 11. If they had done so, then the executives and the UAW would have had to really change. What they got is what they wanted and the changes that they will have to make will only be half hearted. And when the spotlight is off of them it will be business as usual.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECA</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446337</link>
		<dc:creator>ECA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446337</guid>
		<description>AND
the Auto makers are saying..
IF we QUIT making cars, you will loose the TAXES from the Workers, FROM the Purchasers, from the registrations of NEW cars, from the insurance carriers, from traffic tickets...from property tax, from the Property tax of our EMPLOYEES,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AND<br />
the Auto makers are saying..<br />
IF we QUIT making cars, you will loose the TAXES from the Workers, FROM the Purchasers, from the registrations of NEW cars, from the insurance carriers, from traffic tickets&#8230;from property tax, from the Property tax of our EMPLOYEES,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446333</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 05:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446333</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t somebody please think of the children!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t somebody please think of the children!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Adventure</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446310</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Adventure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446310</guid>
		<description>OK, this whole thing is such nonsense!  It astounds me that we are wasting so much energy over what amounts to 1/28th of what was approved without so much as a blink of Congress&#039; eye.  

Oh, and I don&#039;t think that a $2000 tax credit would make me want to buy an American car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this whole thing is such nonsense!  It astounds me that we are wasting so much energy over what amounts to 1/28th of what was approved without so much as a blink of Congress&#8217; eye.  </p>
<p>Oh, and I don&#8217;t think that a $2000 tax credit would make me want to buy an American car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amodedoma</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446226</link>
		<dc:creator>amodedoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446226</guid>
		<description>Oh, and let&#039;s not forget Ronnie Raygun&#039;s free-market system... Maybe it&#039;s time to dump the idea, and bring back import tarifs.  If volkswagon or mazda turned out to be much more expensive...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and let&#8217;s not forget Ronnie Raygun&#8217;s free-market system&#8230; Maybe it&#8217;s time to dump the idea, and bring back import tarifs.  If volkswagon or mazda turned out to be much more expensive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amodedoma</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446224</link>
		<dc:creator>amodedoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446224</guid>
		<description>The USA, world&#039;s largest consumer of automobiles can&#039;t keep their own production profitable?  Maybe if americans would buy american cars, I have an excellent idea!  Instead of bailing out the big 3 the government should offer $2000 rebates to anyone(american) who buys a car from these guys.  It&#039;ll be a lot cheaper and more cost effective, and it&#039;ll allow the taxpayer to decide who they want to help by their choice of car obligating these companies to be more competitive.  Of course the CEO&#039;s of these inefficient mastadons would rather have a handout, who wouldn&#039;t?  I just think it&#039;s a bad idea to set the precedent of bailing out private industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The USA, world&#8217;s largest consumer of automobiles can&#8217;t keep their own production profitable?  Maybe if americans would buy american cars, I have an excellent idea!  Instead of bailing out the big 3 the government should offer $2000 rebates to anyone(american) who buys a car from these guys.  It&#8217;ll be a lot cheaper and more cost effective, and it&#8217;ll allow the taxpayer to decide who they want to help by their choice of car obligating these companies to be more competitive.  Of course the CEO&#8217;s of these inefficient mastadons would rather have a handout, who wouldn&#8217;t?  I just think it&#8217;s a bad idea to set the precedent of bailing out private industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eds70</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/11/dvorak-poll-should-we-bailout-the-car-companies/comment-page-3/#comment-1446180</link>
		<dc:creator>eds70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33519#comment-1446180</guid>
		<description>How come when I voted in your poll, it locked up my computer, and I had to re-boot to get back to the internet????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come when I voted in your poll, it locked up my computer, and I had to re-boot to get back to the internet????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

