<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Gear reviews the Tesla Roadster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:04:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: picante_loco</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1459501</link>
		<dc:creator>picante_loco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1459501</guid>
		<description>Looks like Top Gear fudged a little bit. 

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/22/bbc_top_gear_tesla/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Top Gear fudged a little bit. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/22/bbc_top_gear_tesla/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/22/bbc_top_gear_tesla/' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2008/12/22/bbc_top_gear_tesla/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baswell</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1458454</link>
		<dc:creator>baswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1458454</guid>
		<description>They also fail to mention, in the hydrogen film, that H is only the same price as petrol in the US because it is sponsored.

Not to mention the fact that while they think &quot;hydrogen is as easy to produce as it is to drill for oil&quot;. That may be true, but you need a lot of energy to separate the hydrogen, and where does that come from? For all intents and purposes, unlike oil, H is not an energy source, it is an energy carrier, like a battery.

And if you take grid power and use it to create hydrogen to put in a fuel cell to drive a car, you only get 25% efficiency. If you use grid power to charge batteries to drive your car, you get 75% efficiency.

I am not a roadster kinda guy, but I am looking forward to their family sedan; I would really like that for around town and we&#039;ll keep our LPG powered wagon for the few times we both go in different directions or cross-country with the family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also fail to mention, in the hydrogen film, that H is only the same price as petrol in the US because it is sponsored.</p>
<p>Not to mention the fact that while they think &#8220;hydrogen is as easy to produce as it is to drill for oil&#8221;. That may be true, but you need a lot of energy to separate the hydrogen, and where does that come from? For all intents and purposes, unlike oil, H is not an energy source, it is an energy carrier, like a battery.</p>
<p>And if you take grid power and use it to create hydrogen to put in a fuel cell to drive a car, you only get 25% efficiency. If you use grid power to charge batteries to drive your car, you get 75% efficiency.</p>
<p>I am not a roadster kinda guy, but I am looking forward to their family sedan; I would really like that for around town and we&#8217;ll keep our LPG powered wagon for the few times we both go in different directions or cross-country with the family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angilion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1455443</link>
		<dc:creator>Angilion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1455443</guid>
		<description>At £90K and with the extremely high cost of replacement batteries, the Tesla simply isn&#039;t cost-effective.  It&#039;s more expensive to run than an Elise R, even if you ignore the massive issue of taxation.  EVs are tax free at the moment, but only because they are extremely rare.  On a like for like comparison, the Tesla is at least twice as expensive to run and three times as expensive to buy.  It&#039;s also useless to many people in the UK, as it requires a garage (to charge it overnight).

It&#039;s a rich person&#039;s toy and political statement.  

We couldn&#039;t stand a large-scale change to EVs anyway - it would require too great an increase to electricity production.  

Charging times will remain an issue because charging an EV as conveniently as refueling an ICEV requires in the region of a megawatt supplied to the car and that&#039;s a challenge.  Assuming, of course, that the batteries could take it (Lithium titanate batteries might be able to).

The Tesla is an interesting idea, but it&#039;s a hugely expensive roadster with poor handling, high running costs, low top speed and low practicality - it&#039;s not really competitive except in acceleration (which it excels at - the flat torque curve of an electric motor).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At £90K and with the extremely high cost of replacement batteries, the Tesla simply isn&#8217;t cost-effective.  It&#8217;s more expensive to run than an Elise R, even if you ignore the massive issue of taxation.  EVs are tax free at the moment, but only because they are extremely rare.  On a like for like comparison, the Tesla is at least twice as expensive to run and three times as expensive to buy.  It&#8217;s also useless to many people in the UK, as it requires a garage (to charge it overnight).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a rich person&#8217;s toy and political statement.  </p>
<p>We couldn&#8217;t stand a large-scale change to EVs anyway &#8211; it would require too great an increase to electricity production.  </p>
<p>Charging times will remain an issue because charging an EV as conveniently as refueling an ICEV requires in the region of a megawatt supplied to the car and that&#8217;s a challenge.  Assuming, of course, that the batteries could take it (Lithium titanate batteries might be able to).</p>
<p>The Tesla is an interesting idea, but it&#8217;s a hugely expensive roadster with poor handling, high running costs, low top speed and low practicality &#8211; it&#8217;s not really competitive except in acceleration (which it excels at &#8211; the flat torque curve of an electric motor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1455354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1455354</guid>
		<description>#84 - Greg66

Sure I get it.  It doesn&#039;t charge fast enough, and doesn&#039;t go far enough on a charge.  Big woop.  All barriers fall to technology, eventually. Although I suppose if you want to drive cross-country at 170mph, The electric nature of the car will always be a big problem.  

As to the iPhone, it may charge as quickly as a real cell phone, but once the battery dies and you have to bring it back to the shop to be replaced (at great cost), then it becomes relevant again.  And you can&#039;t do MMS messaging, something that has been available on regular cell phones for years.  Just like the electric car, it&#039;s a technology that hasn&#039;t had the bugs worked out of it yet.

I&#039;m not buying either an iPhone OR an electric car this year, but maybe in the future, when they&#039;ve taken care of the problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#84 &#8211; Greg66</p>
<p>Sure I get it.  It doesn&#8217;t charge fast enough, and doesn&#8217;t go far enough on a charge.  Big woop.  All barriers fall to technology, eventually. Although I suppose if you want to drive cross-country at 170mph, The electric nature of the car will always be a big problem.  </p>
<p>As to the iPhone, it may charge as quickly as a real cell phone, but once the battery dies and you have to bring it back to the shop to be replaced (at great cost), then it becomes relevant again.  And you can&#8217;t do MMS messaging, something that has been available on regular cell phones for years.  Just like the electric car, it&#8217;s a technology that hasn&#8217;t had the bugs worked out of it yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not buying either an iPhone OR an electric car this year, but maybe in the future, when they&#8217;ve taken care of the problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg66</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1455327</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1455327</guid>
		<description>#80 - Mister Mustard

Yeah, you really don&#039;t get the death blow point, do you? In 1885 it took a few minutes to refill the fuel tank of a car and get it moving again. That was Car version 1.0. Try doing a long journey in any electric car. Hell,write postcards to your destination on the way because they&#039;ll get there first.

Until electric cars can be recharged or otherwise refueled in 5 minutes, they will remain curios. 

Your rambling about iPhones is irrelevant and misconceived. An iPhone refuels no slower than its competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#80 &#8211; Mister Mustard</p>
<p>Yeah, you really don&#8217;t get the death blow point, do you? In 1885 it took a few minutes to refill the fuel tank of a car and get it moving again. That was Car version 1.0. Try doing a long journey in any electric car. Hell,write postcards to your destination on the way because they&#8217;ll get there first.</p>
<p>Until electric cars can be recharged or otherwise refueled in 5 minutes, they will remain curios. </p>
<p>Your rambling about iPhones is irrelevant and misconceived. An iPhone refuels no slower than its competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1455040</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1455040</guid>
		<description># 82 Mister Mustard said,  &quot;After the muffler was invented, virtually no work was done on electric cars.&quot;

Right, and work stopped on rubber band powered cars at that time too.  It is because it is a technology that isn&#039;t well suited for that application...

Must suck to be ignorant of the physical sciences...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 82 Mister Mustard said,  &#8220;After the muffler was invented, virtually no work was done on electric cars.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right, and work stopped on rubber band powered cars at that time too.  It is because it is a technology that isn&#8217;t well suited for that application&#8230;</p>
<p>Must suck to be ignorant of the physical sciences&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1455029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1455029</guid>
		<description>#81 - Paddy-RAMBO

&gt;&gt;No. It hasn’t worked out the bugs since 1842

It must suck to be a luddite, RAMBO.

After the muffler was invented, virtually no work was done on electric cars.  Why bother, when the Saudi teat let people like you fill up your high-capacity minivans and Humpers with cheap fuel.  And the enviromaniacs weren&#039;t out in force for 150 years, so there was no pressure on that front.

Now that gasoline-powered SuperCars are rapidly attaining the social status of s stinky cigar, work begins anew on the electric car, and all you dinosaurs can do is bitch and moan that the technology isn&#039;t perfect yet.

Pfffft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#81 &#8211; Paddy-RAMBO</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;No. It hasn’t worked out the bugs since 1842</p>
<p>It must suck to be a luddite, RAMBO.</p>
<p>After the muffler was invented, virtually no work was done on electric cars.  Why bother, when the Saudi teat let people like you fill up your high-capacity minivans and Humpers with cheap fuel.  And the enviromaniacs weren&#8217;t out in force for 150 years, so there was no pressure on that front.</p>
<p>Now that gasoline-powered SuperCars are rapidly attaining the social status of s stinky cigar, work begins anew on the electric car, and all you dinosaurs can do is bitch and moan that the technology isn&#8217;t perfect yet.</p>
<p>Pfffft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy-O</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454978</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454978</guid>
		<description># 80 Mister Mustard said,  &quot;So this bleeding-edge technology hasn’t worked out all the bugs that gasoline-powered cars have been working on since Karl Benz first built his Patent Motorwagon in 1885.&quot;

No. It hasn&#039;t worked out the bugs since 1842, when Thomas Davenport and Robert Davidson were producing electric cars...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 80 Mister Mustard said,  &#8220;So this bleeding-edge technology hasn’t worked out all the bugs that gasoline-powered cars have been working on since Karl Benz first built his Patent Motorwagon in 1885.&#8221;</p>
<p>No. It hasn&#8217;t worked out the bugs since 1842, when Thomas Davenport and Robert Davidson were producing electric cars&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Mustard</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454954</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Mustard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454954</guid>
		<description>#79 - Greg66

Oh poo.  So this bleeding-edge technology hasn&#039;t worked out all the bugs that gasoline-powered cars have been working on since Karl Benz first built his Patent Motorwagon in 1885.

This thing is Version 1.0.  If you want to be The Grooviest Kid On The Block, and have a lot of extra money burning a hole in your pocket, you&#039;ll get one.  Just like the iPhone.  If you want something that will replace the Dodge minivan or the Humper, you&#039;ll wait until Version 2.0 or later.  Just like the iPhone.  

Someday they&#039;ll get that thing off the shitty AT&amp;T network, work out the &quot;features&quot; with MMS messaging, etc., and then it will be a Phone For The Rest Of Us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#79 &#8211; Greg66</p>
<p>Oh poo.  So this bleeding-edge technology hasn&#8217;t worked out all the bugs that gasoline-powered cars have been working on since Karl Benz first built his Patent Motorwagon in 1885.</p>
<p>This thing is Version 1.0.  If you want to be The Grooviest Kid On The Block, and have a lot of extra money burning a hole in your pocket, you&#8217;ll get one.  Just like the iPhone.  If you want something that will replace the Dodge minivan or the Humper, you&#8217;ll wait until Version 2.0 or later.  Just like the iPhone.  </p>
<p>Someday they&#8217;ll get that thing off the shitty AT&amp;T network, work out the &#8220;features&#8221; with MMS messaging, etc., and then it will be a Phone For The Rest Of Us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg66</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454918</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454918</guid>
		<description>The Tesla just doesn&#039;t deliver. It looks like a sports car, and has straight line sports car performance, but through the corners it was rolling like a tall ship in a crosswind. It produced a good time on the track despite its handling, not because of it (and mainly because of its straight line speed). 

But crucially, the recharge time is the death blow. It means you can&#039;t use it for any significant distance driving; in fact, it means that it&#039;s only really suitable for short journeys during the day with an overnight charge. And if you want an electric  around-town runabout, why on earth would you go for a two seater pseudo-sports car? The comparisons with how quickly a petrol care can be run to dry on their track are irrelevant; a petrol car can be refuelled in 5 minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tesla just doesn&#8217;t deliver. It looks like a sports car, and has straight line sports car performance, but through the corners it was rolling like a tall ship in a crosswind. It produced a good time on the track despite its handling, not because of it (and mainly because of its straight line speed). </p>
<p>But crucially, the recharge time is the death blow. It means you can&#8217;t use it for any significant distance driving; in fact, it means that it&#8217;s only really suitable for short journeys during the day with an overnight charge. And if you want an electric  around-town runabout, why on earth would you go for a two seater pseudo-sports car? The comparisons with how quickly a petrol care can be run to dry on their track are irrelevant; a petrol car can be refuelled in 5 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gulfie</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454840</link>
		<dc:creator>Gulfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454840</guid>
		<description>Guys, guys... Top Gear has been an entertainment show for several years. The only things you should treat as facts are the lap times for the cars and stars - everything else is entertainment, pure and simple, by three guys who are complete petrolheads. To get the Tesla on at all was something, can&#039;t wait to see what they do with the Lightning.

Compared to the flames that Jeremy Clarkson in particular gives to any car that fails to meet his expectations, the review was on the whole positive - yes really. Many of the sports cars they test break down, and JC&#039;s Ford GT was alleged never to have completed a journey he started.

I wouldn&#039;t buy a Tesla though - did you see the body roll around the corners? Need to get that battery weight lower down! If it looks like a sports car, it needs to handle like one. At least for us Europeans. Maybe you guys are just too used to soft springs and cars the size of a small whale... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, guys&#8230; Top Gear has been an entertainment show for several years. The only things you should treat as facts are the lap times for the cars and stars &#8211; everything else is entertainment, pure and simple, by three guys who are complete petrolheads. To get the Tesla on at all was something, can&#8217;t wait to see what they do with the Lightning.</p>
<p>Compared to the flames that Jeremy Clarkson in particular gives to any car that fails to meet his expectations, the review was on the whole positive &#8211; yes really. Many of the sports cars they test break down, and JC&#8217;s Ford GT was alleged never to have completed a journey he started.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t buy a Tesla though &#8211; did you see the body roll around the corners? Need to get that battery weight lower down! If it looks like a sports car, it needs to handle like one. At least for us Europeans. Maybe you guys are just too used to soft springs and cars the size of a small whale&#8230; <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454667</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454667</guid>
		<description>For reference the Ferarri 599 managed 1.7 miles on a gallon of fuel (Top Gear, series 11, episode 1), and has a 23 gallon tank (wikipedia), so does 39 miles flat out on the track. The winner of that challenge was the Audi R8 (5mile/gallon) which with a 16 gallon tank would take you 80 miles.

By those standards the 55 miles of the tesla is perfectly reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For reference the Ferarri 599 managed 1.7 miles on a gallon of fuel (Top Gear, series 11, episode 1), and has a 23 gallon tank (wikipedia), so does 39 miles flat out on the track. The winner of that challenge was the Audi R8 (5mile/gallon) which with a 16 gallon tank would take you 80 miles.</p>
<p>By those standards the 55 miles of the tesla is perfectly reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britcoder</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454653</link>
		<dc:creator>Britcoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454653</guid>
		<description>#40 
&quot;I am also unclear as to why Clarkson said it took 16 hours to recharge the Roadster without qualifying that statement at all. The vast majority of people who have taken delivery of their Roadsters (and there are more than 100 of them now) have much faster systems that recharge from dead to full in as little as 3.5 hours.&quot;

The statement was perfectly qualified. Clarkson said that the charging time from a standard 13amp plug was 16 hours, which is the normal domestic high capacity plug in Britain. This plug can only handle about 3kW. The next step up in domestic supplies is getting a direct wire to the fusebox and that will give a supply of about 7 -8 kW with 9kW at a push. This would bring down the charging time to something manageable but you would have to get a qualified electrician to install that to be legal in Britain.

A three-phase system, which could provide enough juice, can cost anything from between 3000 to 72000 GBP depending on location and may not even be available to you at any price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#40<br />
&#8220;I am also unclear as to why Clarkson said it took 16 hours to recharge the Roadster without qualifying that statement at all. The vast majority of people who have taken delivery of their Roadsters (and there are more than 100 of them now) have much faster systems that recharge from dead to full in as little as 3.5 hours.&#8221;</p>
<p>The statement was perfectly qualified. Clarkson said that the charging time from a standard 13amp plug was 16 hours, which is the normal domestic high capacity plug in Britain. This plug can only handle about 3kW. The next step up in domestic supplies is getting a direct wire to the fusebox and that will give a supply of about 7 -8 kW with 9kW at a push. This would bring down the charging time to something manageable but you would have to get a qualified electrician to install that to be legal in Britain.</p>
<p>A three-phase system, which could provide enough juice, can cost anything from between 3000 to 72000 GBP depending on location and may not even be available to you at any price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454398</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454398</guid>
		<description>Seems moot, (a) If it works every manuf with years of experience building and selling cars will use the tech, so a company based purely on the idea of using laptop batteries to power a car is pretty much going to fail in the long term anyway. [And no, don&#039;t think patents unless you consider all the patents that car manufs have on everything cars have]

(b) the show basically pointed out that Honda&#039;s Hydrogen Cell car they featured was far more practical...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems moot, (a) If it works every manuf with years of experience building and selling cars will use the tech, so a company based purely on the idea of using laptop batteries to power a car is pretty much going to fail in the long term anyway. [And no, don't think patents unless you consider all the patents that car manufs have on everything cars have]</p>
<p>(b) the show basically pointed out that Honda&#8217;s Hydrogen Cell car they featured was far more practical&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/15/top-gear-reviews-the-tesla-roadster/comment-page-2/#comment-1454396</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=33729#comment-1454396</guid>
		<description>Seems moot, (a) If it works every manuf with years of experience building and selling cars will use the tech, so a company based purely on the idea of using laptop batteries to power a car is pretty much going to fail in the long term anyway. [And no, don&#039;t think patents unless you consider all the patents that car manufs have on everything cars have]

(b) the show basically pointed out that Honda&#039;s Hydrogen Cell car they featured was far more practical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems moot, (a) If it works every manuf with years of experience building and selling cars will use the tech, so a company based purely on the idea of using laptop batteries to power a car is pretty much going to fail in the long term anyway. [And no, don't think patents unless you consider all the patents that car manufs have on everything cars have]</p>
<p>(b) the show basically pointed out that Honda&#8217;s Hydrogen Cell car they featured was far more practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
