<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft vision of Rent-a-PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:34:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Animby</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462980</link>
		<dc:creator>Animby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462980</guid>
		<description>Certainly no prior art on this is there?

Seems to me, even when desktop units were running upwards of a thousand bucks, companies had a hard time with similar business models.

Not only should this not be patented, as it simply retreads previous marketing attempts, but should a gimmick like this really be patentable at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly no prior art on this is there?</p>
<p>Seems to me, even when desktop units were running upwards of a thousand bucks, companies had a hard time with similar business models.</p>
<p>Not only should this not be patented, as it simply retreads previous marketing attempts, but should a gimmick like this really be patentable at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim h</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462933</link>
		<dc:creator>jim h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462933</guid>
		<description>Another stunningly bad, outdated concept from Microsoft.  Meanwhile Apple keeps on intuiting what consumers would really like to have - and producing it - and selling it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another stunningly bad, outdated concept from Microsoft.  Meanwhile Apple keeps on intuiting what consumers would really like to have &#8211; and producing it &#8211; and selling it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amodedoma</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462908</link>
		<dc:creator>amodedoma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462908</guid>
		<description>There are plenty of sheeple out there to shear, and M$ knows it.  What the hell, there&#039;s room in this market for lots of alternatives.  But if M$ thinks they&#039;re going to use monopolistic strong-arm techniques to force the entire market to this model, they are very, very, mistaken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of sheeple out there to shear, and M$ knows it.  What the hell, there&#8217;s room in this market for lots of alternatives.  But if M$ thinks they&#8217;re going to use monopolistic strong-arm techniques to force the entire market to this model, they are very, very, mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462889</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462889</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t the &quot;Free PC&quot; segment of the dotcom boom establish prior art?  I guess they just charged a monthly fee instead of metering your bandwidth.  I still don&#039;t see how this patent is defensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the &#8220;Free PC&#8221; segment of the dotcom boom establish prior art?  I guess they just charged a monthly fee instead of metering your bandwidth.  I still don&#8217;t see how this patent is defensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462881</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462881</guid>
		<description>This marketing model certainly worked for cell phones but isn&#039;t it WAY too late for PCs?

When PCs were $1,500 or $2,000 I might have  considered such a program -- but when  you can pick one up for $400, how steeply can they discount it?

More likely to work is if the cable or phone companies, give away a free media PC with a broadband connection and a one-year contract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This marketing model certainly worked for cell phones but isn&#8217;t it WAY too late for PCs?</p>
<p>When PCs were $1,500 or $2,000 I might have  considered such a program &#8212; but when  you can pick one up for $400, how steeply can they discount it?</p>
<p>More likely to work is if the cable or phone companies, give away a free media PC with a broadband connection and a one-year contract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QB</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462864</link>
		<dc:creator>QB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 22:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462864</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or does Ballmer look like Al Capone in that picture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or does Ballmer look like Al Capone in that picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462835</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462835</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... So maybe we&#039;ll eventually get &quot;free&quot; basic broadband in the US. But we&#039;ll end up paying thru the nose, usage fees for anything that connects up to it. Yeah, that&#039;s how these things always work out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; So maybe we&#8217;ll eventually get &#8220;free&#8221; basic broadband in the US. But we&#8217;ll end up paying thru the nose, usage fees for anything that connects up to it. Yeah, that&#8217;s how these things always work out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn E.</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462833</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462833</guid>
		<description>Microsoft has come up with NOTHING new. They saw the &quot;Tivo&quot; and they WANTED IT!!! But in the form of their software, since they aren&#039;t in the PC making business. So this approach will be like turn PCes in Tivos. Or rather Peevos. You&#039;ll be peeved at them just as much. But you&#039;ll have to pay a monthly fee to continue to be peeved at them. And there will be even less financial incentive for Microsoft to update and fix its OS&#039;s problems. Since they&#039;ll be getting a renewal fee, anyway, regardless of whether they do anything or not!

Of course some alternative OS might come to the foreground to fill the gap, if M$ takes this approach. That&#039;s why M$ will have to work with the PC and device makers to keep all the driver info proprietary and secret, between them. And don&#039;t depend on Congress passing some law to free up driver code. They&#039;ll bail out of protecting free computing, at the wave of a lobbyist&#039;s dollar bill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has come up with NOTHING new. They saw the &#8220;Tivo&#8221; and they WANTED IT!!! But in the form of their software, since they aren&#8217;t in the PC making business. So this approach will be like turn PCes in Tivos. Or rather Peevos. You&#8217;ll be peeved at them just as much. But you&#8217;ll have to pay a monthly fee to continue to be peeved at them. And there will be even less financial incentive for Microsoft to update and fix its OS&#8217;s problems. Since they&#8217;ll be getting a renewal fee, anyway, regardless of whether they do anything or not!</p>
<p>Of course some alternative OS might come to the foreground to fill the gap, if M$ takes this approach. That&#8217;s why M$ will have to work with the PC and device makers to keep all the driver info proprietary and secret, between them. And don&#8217;t depend on Congress passing some law to free up driver code. They&#8217;ll bail out of protecting free computing, at the wave of a lobbyist&#8217;s dollar bill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zybch</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462813</link>
		<dc:creator>Zybch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462813</guid>
		<description>So tell me, how is this different to signing up with a new cell phone contract where the phone itself is greatly subsidized??
So long as people ultimately have the option to buy a computer and software outright and not have ongoing usage fees whats the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So tell me, how is this different to signing up with a new cell phone contract where the phone itself is greatly subsidized??<br />
So long as people ultimately have the option to buy a computer and software outright and not have ongoing usage fees whats the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimD</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462809</link>
		<dc:creator>JimD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462809</guid>
		<description>M$ = &quot;Software as a (PAY ME NOW ***AND*** PAY ME LATER) &quot;SERVICE&quot; &quot; !!!   

KA-CHING, KA-CHING, KA-CHING !!!

JUST SAY NO !!!

Time for GNU/Linux, OpenOffice, Firefox, etc - FREE, OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE - Computing WITHOUT BEGGING !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M$ = &#8220;Software as a (PAY ME NOW ***AND*** PAY ME LATER) &#8220;SERVICE&#8221; &#8221; !!!   </p>
<p>KA-CHING, KA-CHING, KA-CHING !!!</p>
<p>JUST SAY NO !!!</p>
<p>Time for GNU/Linux, OpenOffice, Firefox, etc &#8211; FREE, OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE &#8211; Computing WITHOUT BEGGING !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GetSmart</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462763</link>
		<dc:creator>GetSmart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462763</guid>
		<description>Epic. Fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epic. Fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breetai</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462745</link>
		<dc:creator>Breetai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462745</guid>
		<description>God Please someone break the monopoly these guys are idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God Please someone break the monopoly these guys are idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deowll</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462742</link>
		<dc:creator>deowll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462742</guid>
		<description>They are welcome to take a long walk  on a short peer will carrying a large walk hopefully while heading out to sea.

The incompatents at the patent office will most likely be brain dead enough to actually give them a patent on this though how renting anything can be a noval idea escapes me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are welcome to take a long walk  on a short peer will carrying a large walk hopefully while heading out to sea.</p>
<p>The incompatents at the patent office will most likely be brain dead enough to actually give them a patent on this though how renting anything can be a noval idea escapes me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Mulne</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462725</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Mulne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462725</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me, too, like the Cellular business model (see the article on text messaging in today&#039;s blog)....

Or King Gillette, many years ago - give away the razors and rape &#039;em for the blades....

Or the telco before the breakup....

People WILL go for it....  It removes thinking (and knowledge) from a good part of the procurement process (software and hardware).  Think about most notebook deals today - fairly decent hardware bundled with MS Office (some flavor or other) and a copy of AOL, and you&#039;re done.  You don&#039;t need to make decisions about memory, processor, graphics cards, etc.  Just take it home an power it up....

(IMHO, a lot of people bought laptops for this reason, rather than any cool factor, back when most PC purchases involved specifying features &amp; such - that they didn&#039;t understand anyway.)

That people are buying desktops bundled up the same way is nice, too, of course....

I just got a new cellphone for my daughter (my new one&#039;s been a horror story of undocumented features that I needed, but that&#039;s another story).  The new bill has a $30 &quot;data&quot; charge on it.  A bunch of ring tones, a game, and $10 for downloading the GPS software....  I called &#039;em about that one....

Which, btw, is another place where the cellular people rip you off - buy a new phone, and all the expensive toys that you had to buy separately go away until you buy them again....  

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me, too, like the Cellular business model (see the article on text messaging in today&#8217;s blog)&#8230;.</p>
<p>Or King Gillette, many years ago &#8211; give away the razors and rape &#8216;em for the blades&#8230;.</p>
<p>Or the telco before the breakup&#8230;.</p>
<p>People WILL go for it&#8230;.  It removes thinking (and knowledge) from a good part of the procurement process (software and hardware).  Think about most notebook deals today &#8211; fairly decent hardware bundled with MS Office (some flavor or other) and a copy of AOL, and you&#8217;re done.  You don&#8217;t need to make decisions about memory, processor, graphics cards, etc.  Just take it home an power it up&#8230;.</p>
<p>(IMHO, a lot of people bought laptops for this reason, rather than any cool factor, back when most PC purchases involved specifying features &amp; such &#8211; that they didn&#8217;t understand anyway.)</p>
<p>That people are buying desktops bundled up the same way is nice, too, of course&#8230;.</p>
<p>I just got a new cellphone for my daughter (my new one&#8217;s been a horror story of undocumented features that I needed, but that&#8217;s another story).  The new bill has a $30 &#8220;data&#8221; charge on it.  A bunch of ring tones, a game, and $10 for downloading the GPS software&#8230;.  I called &#8216;em about that one&#8230;.</p>
<p>Which, btw, is another place where the cellular people rip you off &#8211; buy a new phone, and all the expensive toys that you had to buy separately go away until you buy them again&#8230;.  </p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nth of the 49th</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2008/12/30/microsoft-vision-of-rent-a-pc/comment-page-1/#comment-1462706</link>
		<dc:creator>Nth of the 49th</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=35044#comment-1462706</guid>
		<description>Microsoft trying to get into the hardware side of things .....again.
What that definition of insanity again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft trying to get into the hardware side of things &#8230;..again.<br />
What that definition of insanity again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
