# 96 bobbo said, “I did address the “science” and the economics”

Umm, actually, no. You didn’t address ANY of the scientific or economic issues …

Bobbo did address the issues. You, unfortunately, are still here trolling. You only consider the “science” and “economic” issues that you can understand. And that isn’t very much. And I am not sorry Bobbo did not stoop to your infantile level.

Cow-Patty School of Economics,
If you buy poopcycles for $2.50 a dozen and sell them for $0.20 each, you don’t make much money. So that means you have to sell two dozen poopcycles. And if you still don’t make much money, sell three dozen.

It must be very sad living your life. Being such a failure you need to resort to lies to get attention. A truly sad existence.

Umm, actually, no. You didn’t address ANY of the scientific or economic issues associated with attempting to use wind or solar as a substitute for actual base energy generation technology. Nor did you even mention that choice and the final effect on kh/h rates vs. existing technology that produces our electricity.

But, you don’t know anything about this so, what can I expect?

Regis Philbin: Final answer?

HMeyers: Final answer.

Fettuccine Alfredo is one of those trolls that get their science and smarts from the FOX and Friends TV show. If you are ever feeling just a little too smart some day, just watch for an hour or so and BAM, just like taking two stupid pills! And it lasts all day too. Most often longer.

Links? Who needs stinking links? If you heard it on Fox and Friends then it is true. The TV wouldn’t lie. At least not FOX.

We are discussing oil…I say “What is both natural and organic MUST be biodegradable, it is elementary deduction.

Making the same false statement again and again does not make it true. Diamonds, by your own logic, are also natural and organic. Tell me that in your brain they are biodegradable. Go ahead already. It’s the same elementary deduction exactly as the one you keep touting based on no evidence at all.

With typical liberal irrationality, you of course cannot view the reality of oil, deduce from its actual nature, and conclude truth…rather you focus upon an unreality of your own construct…critically speaking…a false analogy:

Deduce? How about just checking the facts. Is it or is it not biodegradable? If so, how long does it take to degrade? Clearly it is more than 14 years. Is that too slow to be a non-problem? Yes. Do you care? No.

We were talking about oil, not diamonds. They are not analogous…oil is not rock hard compressed substance…

Moran!!! By your logic, they were organic material. The underwent a natural process. Therefore, they are biodegradable.

You are failing to understand that this is your logic I am applying. Coal, like oil is organic. Compression into diamonds is natural. Therefore it is natural and biodegradable, just exactly like oil. It’s not an analogy. It’s your logic applied. It is exactly the same. Both started from organic matter and underwent geological processes.

Now, back to the real question. Do you have a damn link showing the length of time for oil to biodegrade?

Back in post #72, you claimed that Valdez was already clean. Do you have a link to back that up? I have a link that says otherwise from a reputable publication citing a peer reviewed article in science?

Would it be too liberal of you to back up one freakin’ thing you said??!!?

I guess so. You sir are a troll. Come out and see the sun. May it turn you into stone quickly.

BTW, MikeN (post #79), it was post #72 where Fettuccine Alfredo said:

As for the Exon [sic] Valdez oil spill…that’s gone, long ago…

Perhaps you’d care to back that up for him since he’s too much of a moran.

Obama’s spending plan is not stimulus, as even the Congressional Budget Office has observed, alone with all other reputable ecconomists…

Several times you have been asked to provide a link. You haven’t so I did. The CBO said nothing about the Stimulus Package being harmful to the economy.

See what happens when you get your news from Limbarf?

They are bankrupting the country in the name of their ideology…

Whatever this Administration does, it will be to repair the damage done by the previous lot of neo-cons, conservatives, libertarians, evangelicals, right wing nuts, chicken hawks, Republicans, and the radio-shut-in talking heads. Whatever damage done will be far less than the damage if nothing is done.

If you don’t know someone hurt by this recession, then it can only be because you are hiding behind the furnace so your mother won’t make you take out the garbage. It is so easy to say this Stimulus is bad, but you have no alternative plan other than cut taxes from the very people that caused this mess.

I’m firmly convinced you must have gone to the same trolling seminar as Cow-Patty.

I think you are soon to go from Zero into the negative range. Pull up before its too late.

No, the difficult part is the science. As you have so painfully discovered.

My immediate reaction is not to believe a gosh darned thing BushtheRetard says==and didn’t he say the big banks needed the bailouts?

There is always another way.

Paddy-Zero–check. Just being difficult.

Me surly? Never

Seriously? Let all the banks fail? Most companies wouldn’t make payroll, people won’t be able to buy groceries because they have no cash, etc.

I’m not saying leave the banks exactly as they were before Lehman went down, but the mess has to be straightened out – and it hasn’t yet. Bad banks, yes, get rid of them. Good banks, let’s make them better.

But a cascade failure of the entire banking system (which is still a possibility) would be a catastrophe. Yes it sucks, but the alternative would last for decades and the US would basically be owned by foreign interests.

What I’m concerned about is that $100′s billions have been thrown at the banks with very little thought to restructuring and improving. Everyone is still operating under the same rules which hasn’t solved anything yet. Until that ‘little item’ is sorted out the rest of it doesn’t matter.

If you can’t address the technical aspect of the question, why comment?

You can’t plug you TV into an outlet powered by campaign slogans. If you have something to add regarding technology let me know…

Are you this calcified, or just being difficult??

Irrelevant. If you don’t replace fossil fuel base generation we won’t ever be free of using fossil fuel.

Get it?

This will be your last lesson from me…
A smart grid allows decentralization power generation so you could let your wind mill sell power back to the utility when you are making surplus power from all the hot air you plow out.

A smart future would be to get off the corporate coal/gas tit and have many ways to generate power some small some large the more and the cleaner the better.

Like I said if $58 billion is not enough for energy lets spend more. This energy thing is the key. Solve this energy thing and you gain independence from oil selling countries, get clean air and water, employ lots of people and gain technology and products you can export. The biggest obstacle will be the current energy producers lobbies.

Remember I KNOW ALL! Disagreeing with me only shows your ignorance.

I have decided you are not worth my time. My advice to you 0-Paddy is unplug that radio and work towards Nirvana. I wish you the best and I mean that.