Comments on: Give phony info to Homeland Security — “here’s your passport!”

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:30:49 +0000

#19, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

I’m writing this real slow, just for you.

The Republican Party and President Bush implemented new regulations making it harder to obtain most types of ID.

This was sold to the American people as an effort to thwart terrorism. This test showed how poorly those new regulations are working.

This happened during Bushes Presidency. Bushes and the right wing nut cry to stop terrorism is a sham.

And you are still an idiot.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:40:34 +0000

# 18 Mr. Fusion said, “Read my post, idiot.”

Again you don’t have a point. I said that docs have always been easy to forge. You retorted with babble. What was your point.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 01:14:47 +0000

#16, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

Fraud isn’t attempted by the honest. Bush is the greatest President ever.

Read my post, idiot. That is exactly what I wrote. This test was using forged documents. The same thing the heightened requirements were designed to halt.

Why do you hate America. I’m sure you could find a new home in some Central American country.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:17:17 +0000

I’m talking generally, that the government is hiring too many people, and has too many people right now. The various protections built in make it nearly impossible to lower the workforce.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:46:20 +0000

# 15 Mr. Fusion said, “Not for those who are honest and play by the rules.”

You’re babbling again. Fraud isn’t attempted by the honest. So, what was your point?

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:34:31 +0000

#6, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

No surprise. It has been this easy, or easier since at least ‘89.

Not for those who are honest and play by the rules. But then the Bush Administration “tightened the rules” to prevent terrorists from gaining American identification.

You do remember your idol, George Bush? AKA Jr., Shrub, “W”, Baby Bush, and “The Turd Blossom Butt Kisser”. Your hero that fell to a new record in disapproval ratings at 20% (you do remember how you lied about that one).

And before you blame the current Administration, read the effen article. The test was done between July and December 2008, while your hero was still in office.

By: ECA

ECA — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:17:45 +0000

5,
What the F% are you talking about.

There is 1 agency in the USA that can track 90% of the Cits, EASY..
The corps that track your credit scores.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:27:19 +0000

#5, Lyin’ Mike,

Some days you just blow me away. I can only hope you didn’t mean what you wrote.

Instead of replacing, how about you just eliminate the positions, and not hire the hundreds of thousands Obama is planning on hiring?

If the positions are eliminated, then who will complete the passport process? Then, if there are no passports, how will Americans travel to other countries?

If there is a problem with the current system, how about we fix it instead of getting all poopy on Obama because of the system Bush implemented. Or did you forget that this is another of Bushes messes?

By: MikeN

MikeN — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:40:36 +0000

People can get by security measures, so do you want to just keep tightening?

By: airphloo

airphloo — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:11:05 +0000

The U.S. is a laughing stock when it comes to identification documents, largely due to our federal system. Yes, there are plenty of deadbeat bureaucrats and automatons running these things but being familiar with all of the thousands of different identity docs out there is not easy. I really think you either toughen up and make some strict national standards with biometrics or you live with this kind of thing. It really just depends on your personal philosophy: is security or privacy more important?

By: eaze

eaze — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:53:38 +0000

How bout you guys just get rid of the fed, wouldn’t that solve half your problems?

By: Wretched Gnu

Wretched Gnu — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:10:29 +0000

Please remember that the principle of Bush’s “Homeland Security” strategy was not a careful consideration of facts, evidence and research. It is based solely on the principle of “Lock up the darkies”.

By: Mr Diesel

Mr Diesel — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:23:53 +0000

Yep, I went from business and consulting to a state government job.

I can safely say that the too many of the workers at my employer are just waiting to collect a pension check. I remember sitting in a meeting tell a bunch of them that so many of the people working here could not make it on the outside…….they were aghast at me even thinking such a thing. Exactly my point.

By: ECA

ECA — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:22:10 +0000

to much paperwork,
NONE of it is cross matched, like BIRTH and death certificate..
NO computerized, reference to STATE licenses..

ALL of which should of been installed and RUNNING 30 years ago..AND SHOULDNT be that hard to get running. EXCEPT that MOST states have 1 MAIN server to control the WHOLE state, including welfare, Motor vehicles, Police, and most other offices..when that server goes DOWN, IT ALL GOES DOWN.

By: Paddy-O

Paddy-O — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:00:33 +0000

No surprise. It has been this easy, or easier since at least ’89.