The Man on the Street Reacts to Conservative Talk Show Host’s Pornographic Audiobook

By Wednesday March 25, 2009

Har! The Moral Voice of America indeed.

Found by the Warnerian.



57 Comments
  1. amodedoma says:
    3/25/2009 at 1:57 pm

    Sure but did he record/write it before, during, or after being a school teacher. Friggin’ hypocrite. Anybody who takes Oreily seriously deserves to be in a coma. Yeah you can trust the cultural warrior, he’ll save you from the radical left agenda. If you can believe that, you are gullible. Yeah, I know it’s not in the dictionary….

    Reply
  2. ronwp54 says:
    3/25/2009 at 2:25 pm

    Typical left nutballs, you can’t logically argue against the message, so you scour through every bit of a persons life looking for something to try an destroy them personally. If this is the worst you can find you should go back to rummaging thru Bill’s garbage for some better material.

    Reply
  3. Angel H. Wong says:
    3/25/2009 at 2:49 pm

    To Republicans it’s okay because:

    a) It’s fantasy so it’s no real proof of an orgams.

    b) It’s not gay sex.

    Reply
  4. spot the charlatan says:
    3/25/2009 at 3:07 pm

    #22
    “you can’t logically argue against the message, so you scour through every bit of a persons life looking for something to try an destroy them personally”

    Straight out of the Karl Rove play book.

    Reply
  5. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/25/2009 at 3:20 pm

    #14, Alphie,

    Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…

    Its relevant.

    Please explain how it is relevant. And please post some source for your accusation Obama sold drugs.

    We all realize your extreme fanaticism. We also are aware of how your god told you to forgive and love your fellow man. If it was good enough for Bush and Boss Limpdick to do drugs, it should be just peachy for others to have experimented.

    You do remember experimenting. Like when the Youth Pastor gave you that pill that made you dizzy.

    Reply
  6. deowll says:
    3/25/2009 at 3:21 pm

    Not high class. When did this occur and why should I care? He wasn’t running around with terrorist or something.

    Reply
  7. Alfred1 says:
    3/25/2009 at 3:47 pm

    Mr. Fusion said, on March 25th, 2009 at 3:20 pm

    #14, Alphie,

    Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…

    Its relevant.

    Please explain how it is relevant.

    Glad too…if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.

    If O’reilly should stop, so should Obama.

    As for Obama’s past drug use…and sales…see his books.

    As for my former drug use…I once was a like you, drug crazed…irrational…slandering all who disagreed…

    Yes…we can tell by your posts the chemicals were good…but that does not mean we want to remain in a rut, as you have…the 60′s are over.

    Reply
  8. Jim says:
    3/25/2009 at 4:23 pm

    #17. “You can smell the lib panic in the air. LOL”

    Panic? What the Fuck are you talking about? Your mommy really needs to up your meds son.

    Reply
  9. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/25/2009 at 4:45 pm

    #27, Alphie,

    …if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.

    That does not explain anything. O’Reilly promotes his image as All-American. The passages read from his book don’t sound very “wholesome” to me. They sound quite hypocritical.

    There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature. The closest he could ever get to James Joyce or Terry Southern would be to pop some acid and dream on. Maybe he already did.

    BTW, I don’t see you invalidating Bushes Presidency because his reputation as a free for all drug addict and drunk is well mentioned.

    Reagan also smoked pot with Errol Flynn and David Niven (see Bring on the Empty Horses). Of course, all Presidents drank alcohol both before and while in office.

    Reply
  10. bobbo says:
    3/25/2009 at 4:50 pm

    #29–Fusion==I don’t see what is written by a struggling author as fiction as a young man as establishing hypocrisy of any sort for positions taken later in life “unless” O’Reilly criticized someone else for the same thing without revealing his own efforts.

    In fact, having committed the sin/crime he is in the best position to comment on the harm it causes.

    Alfred is becoming quite inane and irrelevant, thats true without hypocrisy no matter what the background of a commenter.

    Reply
  11. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/25/2009 at 5:41 pm

    #30, Bobbo,

    I don’t see what is written by a struggling author as fiction as a young man as establishing hypocrisy of any sort for positions taken later in life

    I agree. But apparently Alphie wants to “invalidate” Obama as a bad President for having experimented with drugs as a teen. Like 90% of Americans have done, including, by his own admission, Alphie. In my opinion, very few people should have their juvenile actions follow them through their whole lives.

    BUT, if you later on decide to criticize others for similar actions, be prepared to be called out for it. BTW, this was published around 1998 and O’Reilly wasn’t that struggling a person.

    The hypocracy

    The Book
    Those who Trespass: A Novel of Murder and Television
    By Bill O’Reilly
    Published by Bancroft Press, 1998
    ISBN 0963124684, 9780963124685
    288 pages

    Reply
  12. bobbo says:
    3/25/2009 at 5:48 pm

    #31–Fusion==that recently huh? Popular novelist Grisham jokes that he can’t write sex scenes so he doens’t even try.

    Bill-O should take the same advice==that passage that is provided is about as lame as I have ever heard.

    I’ve played with the notion of writing fiction myself but years ago heard that a good author will not use phrases they have read/hear before. Being about as unoriginal as possible, that guideline keeps me from even trying. Didn’t hold Anne Rice back any at all however.

    I’m jut a critic, not an artist.

    Reply
  13. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/25/2009 at 5:50 pm

    #30, Bobbo,

    Please excuse me. All this talk about O’Reilly has given me an extreme need to shower.

    Reply
  14. JimD says:
    3/25/2009 at 5:58 pm

    What would you expect from Dildo O’Liely ???

    Reply
  15. webstershamm says:
    3/25/2009 at 6:57 pm

    I wonder if bill has nude slideshow pic’s of ann coulter and michele malkin on his ipornphone.

    Reply
  16. Alfred1 says:
    3/26/2009 at 3:17 am

    #27, Alphie,
    …if O’Reilly’s fictional works somehow invalidates his commentary on the news…then Obama’s past drug use invalidates his work as President.
    That does not explain anything. O’Reilly promotes his image as All-American. The passages read from his book don’t sound very “wholesome” to me. They sound quite hypocritical.
    Non sequitur…O’relly never promoted THAT WORK OF FICTION as “all American” therefore my argument remains valid…

    If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events, then Obama’s past drug use is also. Both have the same connection.

    In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

    There are very few successful writers that have written porn and serious literature. The closest he could ever get to James Joyce or Terry Southern would be to pop some acid and dream on. Maybe he already did.
    BTW, I don’t see you invalidating Bushes Presidency because his reputation as a free for all drug addict and drunk is well mentioned.
    Reagan also smoked pot with Errol Flynn and David Niven (see Bring on the Empty Horses). Of course, all Presidents drank alcohol both before and while in office.

    Again you argue like a girly man, irrational. The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound…if O’Reilly’s analysis of the news is “a priori” wrong because of fictional statements, THEN Obama’s grasp of reality is “a priori” wrong because of his past actions with drugs…

    But it is plausible to suppose the chemicals you once addled your brain with…were first class, as they seem to continue to addle your brain.

    Reply
  17. bobbo says:
    3/26/2009 at 4:29 am

    #36–whats it all about Alfie?==if “a priori” a fish swims what does that tell us of a man walking?

    Reply
  18. Paddy-O says:
    3/26/2009 at 5:53 am

    The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…

    Reply
  19. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/26/2009 at 6:32 am

    #36, Alphie, the Qualude Queen

    If O’Reilly’s fictional work is relevant to analysis of world events,

    It isn’t. What is relevant is his condemnation of actions that he has approved of in his other words. Yes, it may be fiction, but that is not an excuse. He has condemned the porn industry when he himself has written it. He blamed a rape victim because of the way she was dressed as if that has something to do with the fact she was assaulted when he has written it

    In other words, for the critically challenged, your argument is unsound, and my Obama “analogy” is supposed illustrate that fact EVEN to you, a very irrational person.

    The second clause is totally incomprehensible.

    The question isn’t whether presidents experimented with drugs, the issue is whether YOUR reasoning is sound

    Ah, Alphie, you just condemned Obama because he admitted using drugs as a youth. That is the whole thrust of your argument. In #14 you wrote

    Good…now Obama’s past drug associates and customers need to come out…and tell us all about Obama’s words to them…

    Its relevant.

    I don’t see anything in that post about MY reasoning being sound. I asked you to show some proof that he sold drugs(post #25). Yes, he admitted experimenting in his book. You didn’t give us any proof he ever sold drugs, a much more serious accusation.

    Now, instead of supplying anything to back up your accusation, you want to claim my reasoning is unsound. Instead of replying to the question, you attack the questioner.

    Is that what “god” told you to do?

    Reply
  20. Mr. Fusion says:
    3/26/2009 at 6:39 am

    #38, Cow-Paddy, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

    The amount of lib spittle here may cause the sea level rise that leftist nut jobs are always yammering about…

    Damn, coming from a guy that couldn’t get a date in High School lecturing others on teen pregnancy, that is funny.

    I disparately want to add that to your handle, do you have any suggestions?

    Reply

« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

Leave a Response


Bad Behavior has blocked 26637 access attempts in the last 7 days.