(CNN) – Erik Roberts, an Army sergeant who was wounded in Iraq, underwent his 13th surgery recently to save his right leg from amputation. Imagine his shock when he got a bill for $3,000 for his treatment. “I just thought it was bull—- that I’m getting billed for being wounded in Iraq doing my job. I always put the mission first, and now that I was wounded in Iraq, they’re sending me bills,” he said.
“I put my life on the line and I was wounded in combat, and I came back and they’re not going to take care of my medical bills?” It’s a level of outrage shared by his mother, as well as the doctor who performed the surgery. “It’s hard to understand why we’re not taking care of guys like Erik whose injuries are clearly related to their service. They deserve the best care of anybody,” said Dr. William Obremskey, an Air Force veteran and surgeon at Vanderbilt Orthopaedics in Nashville, Tennessee.
“For him to be responsible for $3,000, I think, is a little ridiculous or is uncalled for, particularly in this situation.”
His mother, Robin Roberts, put it more succinctly: “Why should any soldier pay one penny of a medical bill from injuries that occurred while they were fighting in a war? That’s what really frustrates me.” The Department of Veterans Affairs has now decided to pay his bill, but only after prodding from a U.S. senator who got involved after CNN brought it to his attention. He retired from the Army in October 2007, because of his war injuries, and enrolled in college last fall at Youngstown State University, majoring in finance and minoring in economics.
But in December, he says, a golf ball-sized lump appeared on his wounded leg. He says he went to a Veterans Affairs hospital and was told not to worry about it.
A few days later, he says, he went to the emergency room after the lump flared up more. A doctor there, he says, told him that the leg was badly infected and that it might have to be amputated. His leg was saved. The $3,000 billed to Roberts wasn’t for the surgery itself. It’s a portion of the bill for six weeks of daily antibiotics to prevent the infection from coming back. His private insurance plan picked up the majority of the $90,000 in costs.
Roberts has been administering the drugs himself — up to seven IVs a day, with a nurse coming to his home once a week to check on him. At one point, his mom says, the insurance company suggested the war veteran should be put in a nursing home to receive the round-the-clock antibiotics.
“Now why would you want to put an injured soldier who is 25 years old in a nursing home to get IVs?” Robin Roberts said. “He said, ‘Send me home and teach me to do it myself.’ “












#12 BillM
I decided to bite…
Well, I have nothing against making a profit. Just not with lives. What happens if you are a self employed American with a heart condition? You’re screwed, that’s what. Even if you make a decent, above average, income. And what happens if you are out of work with some kind of industrial disease?
Private Health, based on Insurance policies only works if you are working for others, preferably, a large company, and you don’t have cronical conditions (in witch case you can’t find a good job…).
Anyone thinking the government will do a better job at deciding who is worthy of what treatment is sadly mistaken. You can sue insurance companies and public pressure tends to keep them mostly in line. However, that won’t happen if the govt. takes control. You’ll get what they say and that will be the end of it. No one in this country is denied needed medical treatment. Try going to the emergency room sometime, it will often be half full of illegal immigrants and people with no insurance. That is one of the main reasons health care is so expensive, you’re paying for all the ones who don’t pay. It wasn’t very long ago you either paid out of your own pocket or you did without. Our system right now isn’t perfect, but it certainly seems to do a pretty good job for the most part.
#17 & 20
We have a voluntary armed force. Not a conscripted one.
NO ONE asked him. He chose to go.
Bully for him.
But don’t expect a government that rationed his munitions, exposed him to possible biological agents, told his fellow soldiers they were pussies and to buck up when they had depression and battle fatigue, gave them insufficient armour and provisions; that they will take care of you.
Didn’t history show you from the post civil war to Desert Storm show how they take care of you?
Oh that’s right we’re in the US, we are taught WHAT to think, not HOW to.
Cursor_
#23, Cursor,
We have a voluntary armed force. Not a conscripted one.
Very true. If he had of been conscripted then WE wouldn’t have asked him, WE would have told him to join.
Strange . . . when I was in the military we were given a promise, by the Federal Government, of free and full medical benefits for life, with no strings attached – no income qualification, no nothing. That was part of the deal period. It is interesting how our country has flat out broken the contract with the veterans – and is getting away with it. This isn’t a hand out, but payment in return for my service and putting my life on the line. While I hope I never need VA medical, it would have been nice to know I had something to fall back on if absolutely necessary. The veteran in this story earned the right to this treatment. Instead he is being pimped by a lying government and ungrateful people.
Just looking at your medical system as someone who lives in the UK, and I have to say it is scary. IMOs who can avoid paying your costs provided their lawyers can find some excuse, no state provision that makes sure everyone is covered, particularly, especially those who for love of their country put themselves in harm’s way.
Our NHS is not perfect, and can screw up big time, but when I see what you have over there, I thank God for Nye Bevin and “socialized medicine”!