Comments on: Applying for food stamps? Republican lawmaker says, “Pee in a cup, first!”

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:12:22 +0000

#93, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike

Read it Lyin’ Mike. I really want to believe you can read. Seriously, I want to give you credit for more than being Cow-Patty’s stooge.

By: MikeN

MikeN — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:30:38 +0000

>The Federal Law requires only that you be attempting to find work. There is no other means test allowed.

Where in your link does it say this?

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:09:19 +0000

#91 Why? You’ll still be conFused.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:16:55 +0000

#86, ‘dro

???

Get back to me when you figure out what you intended to say.

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:11:29 +0000

#89 Be prepared to be attacked by “libs” in disguise, who push for people’s liberties but neglect to see nor condemn the consequences of their acts. Wonder why?

By: goron32

goron32 — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:52:17 +0000

As a WV resident and someone who works in Emergency Medicine, I supported this new law. A significant percentage of those who refuse to work have substance abuse problems. I see the people who abuse the system and use our tax dollars to buy their drugs. The first week of the month is always the busiest in the ER for drug overdoses and the end of the month is the busiest for drug seekers. Most of these people don’t have jobs, they “get a check.”

This law was an attempt to stem the problem. So, look down your nose, if you will, but I applaud Craig Blair’s efforts.

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:35:25 +0000

#87 You didn’t read all the post, did you?

By: revere

revere — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:19:04 +0000

so what if i ate a poppyseed bagel that morning?

instant fail – yet i dont do drugs

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:20:18 +0000

#84 Projecting? I hope you don’t wonder why I call you conFused.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:12:32 +0000

#51, Cow-Patty, Ignorant Shit Talking Sociopath, Retired Mall Rent-A-Cop, Pretend Constitutional Scholar, Fake California Labor Law Expert, Pseudo Military Historian, Phony Climate Scientist, and Real Leading Troll Extraordinare,

It is actually paid into by the employer…

You cut that short.

It is actually paid into by the employer… on behalf of the employee.

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:05:29 +0000

#82, ‘dro,

What is this with wanting people to go to London? Are you too busy sunning yourself in Castro’s paradise to bother attending yourself?

Effen lazy as—le

By: Mr. Fusion

Mr. Fusion — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 13:03:33 +0000

#22, Stooopid Lyin’ Mike,

Got a link?

Ya, try this

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:27:19 +0000

#81 Yeap, you’re as naive as I thought. You could have score some money by attending the London portests. Then again, you would have come cheap to the organizers of the protest, you’re a true believer.

By: Hugh Ripper

Hugh Ripper — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:23:52 +0000

#80 Pedro

>You have to help those that really deserve to >be helped whether is a poor person or a >company in need.

Who makes the call about who ‘really deserves’ help? I take it your not a Christian. What would Jesus say to that?

I know many ‘dopers’ and ‘boozers’ and most of them lead normal peaceful productive lives. I have no wish to see them, or anyone for that matter, persecuted and criminalised if they are suddenly cast into poverty or unemployment.

As for the London protesters, I care little about ‘making the world leader do the right thing’, because they serve the elite and don’t give a rats rectum about you and I. However, it pleases me to see them inconvenienced and I’m glad that many people took to the streets, regardless of their individual motives, to make as much noise and uproar as possible to show that not everyone will take their shit quietly.

The anarchists smashed up a bank because they hate bankers and see them as the root of all evil. Cant say I disagree, and the bank will get over it.

>Abolish money, fer cryin’ out loud!

Clearly this is a reactionary slogan. I personally see it as pretty stupid, but I know where the anger comes from.

>And, you have to admit that hating stupidity >is way better than hating poverty.

I have no idea what your on about here. Perhaps you should have thought about it more.

By: pedro

pedro — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:26:14 +0000

Where to start, since you are into several “me too” illusions.

The one pertaining this post is that everybody needs blind solidarity by default. You have to help those that really deserve to be helped whether is a poor person or a company in need. Boozers & freeloaders deserve a much help as AIG execs: None! (note I didn’t separate doper s’cause you’ll find them everywhere, maybe that’s why companies are failing, huh?)

Regarding the G-20 portest, believing that the protest was real. They’re just riding the wave to get their own agenda. It has nothing to do with “making the leaders of the world do the right thing” and everything to do with “it’s my time to get the loot”

On top of that, they don’t even try to make it look real. Abolish money, fer cryin’ out loud! And the Bank of England & the Royal Bank of Scotland (didn’t someone said this is not a Brit-generated crisis?) could have been burglarized anyday of the week, why yesterday? I don’t see any “global” protest with that.

And, you have to admit that hating stupidity is way better than hating poverty.