<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nokia says WiMax is wireless Betamax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:49:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1509960</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1509960</guid>
		<description>Editor==


This is about the third time I have noticed Sarah posting the same message.  You might send the paramedics to her website and see if she is off her meds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Editor==</p>
<p>This is about the third time I have noticed Sarah posting the same message.  You might send the paramedics to her website and see if she is off her meds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1509953</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 12:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1509953</guid>
		<description>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#039;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Sarah

http://www.clpostingguide.info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don&#8217;t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.</p>
<p>Sarah</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clpostingguide.info" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href='http://www.clpostingguide.info' rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.clpostingguide.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sargasso</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507957</link>
		<dc:creator>sargasso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507957</guid>
		<description>#12. you bet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#12. you bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shenzhov</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507864</link>
		<dc:creator>Shenzhov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507864</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does that picture of these two remind you of a couple of sleazy used car salesman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does that picture of these two remind you of a couple of sleazy used car salesman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atmusky</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507669</link>
		<dc:creator>atmusky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507669</guid>
		<description>&quot;I like the concept of RF-based communications competing with copper and fibre - just to kick everyone along in the direction of providing bandwidth capable of lots of IPTV for example. But, I ain’t holding my breath waiting.&quot;

Internet TV will soon be dead, the cable companies are starting to charge by the GB - in my area Time Warner prices will be $30/ mo for 5 GB &amp; $50/mo for 20 GBs if you go over it will cost you $1/GB. Change goes into effect this summer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I like the concept of RF-based communications competing with copper and fibre &#8211; just to kick everyone along in the direction of providing bandwidth capable of lots of IPTV for example. But, I ain’t holding my breath waiting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Internet TV will soon be dead, the cable companies are starting to charge by the GB &#8211; in my area Time Warner prices will be $30/ mo for 5 GB &amp; $50/mo for 20 GBs if you go over it will cost you $1/GB. Change goes into effect this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ggore</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507667</link>
		<dc:creator>ggore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507667</guid>
		<description>They are &quot;going full blast&quot; in rolling out LTE, huh?   Interesting.  Is there one LTE tower running in the US yet?...NO   Have they covered the ENTIRE US with 3G yet?....NO     Have they covered the ENTIRE US with EDGE yet?....NO    Have they covered the ENTIRE US with plain digital yet?....NO.  

This is a crock.  Wi-Max has always been touted as the way broadband was finally going to be able to reach EVERY populated corner of the country at last.  Fewer towers, better reach, etc.   Now I read that Wi-Max will only be available in a few major cities this year, rolled out in a few more next year, and on and on.  No mention of smaller towns or rural areas.  

These companies have NEVER completed a generation of technology to the extent that everyone in the country can use it, before they move on to the &quot;next big thing&quot;, leaving half the country in a huge coverage hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are &#8220;going full blast&#8221; in rolling out LTE, huh?   Interesting.  Is there one LTE tower running in the US yet?&#8230;NO   Have they covered the ENTIRE US with 3G yet?&#8230;.NO     Have they covered the ENTIRE US with EDGE yet?&#8230;.NO    Have they covered the ENTIRE US with plain digital yet?&#8230;.NO.  </p>
<p>This is a crock.  Wi-Max has always been touted as the way broadband was finally going to be able to reach EVERY populated corner of the country at last.  Fewer towers, better reach, etc.   Now I read that Wi-Max will only be available in a few major cities this year, rolled out in a few more next year, and on and on.  No mention of smaller towns or rural areas.  </p>
<p>These companies have NEVER completed a generation of technology to the extent that everyone in the country can use it, before they move on to the &#8220;next big thing&#8221;, leaving half the country in a huge coverage hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echeola</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507642</link>
		<dc:creator>echeola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507642</guid>
		<description>They have wimax here in madison wi. I can get 6 meg a sec for $45 a mo. Hardly competitive with the cable co, but still decent. So it&#039;s here right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have wimax here in madison wi. I can get 6 meg a sec for $45 a mo. Hardly competitive with the cable co, but still decent. So it&#8217;s here right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507628</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507628</guid>
		<description>#4 you&#039;re smoking the good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 you&#8217;re smoking the good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507591</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507591</guid>
		<description>Follow the money.   Nokia (and Ericsson) both have intellectual property interests in LTE. 

In addition, they both are top infrastructure equipment suppliers to LTE&#039;s predecessor (GSM and 3G/Edge). 

Why would they support a new technology that levels the playing field?  Either way, WiMax and LTE are built on the same OFDM foundation so it will be nothing more than what you have today with 802.11 A/B/G/N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money.   Nokia (and Ericsson) both have intellectual property interests in LTE. </p>
<p>In addition, they both are top infrastructure equipment suppliers to LTE&#8217;s predecessor (GSM and 3G/Edge). </p>
<p>Why would they support a new technology that levels the playing field?  Either way, WiMax and LTE are built on the same OFDM foundation so it will be nothing more than what you have today with 802.11 A/B/G/N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507586</link>
		<dc:creator>Special Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507586</guid>
		<description>Nokia hasn&#039;t seen my technology yet.  400Mb up/down and it is secure.  We will double that speed shortly.  OFDM will do broadband over power lines as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia hasn&#8217;t seen my technology yet.  400Mb up/down and it is secure.  We will double that speed shortly.  OFDM will do broadband over power lines as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roland</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507571</link>
		<dc:creator>roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507571</guid>
		<description>He got his analogy wrong... Betamax is superior to VHS, it failed because Sony was greedy and wanted big dough for licensing...

He should probably just say Wimax is the wireless dialup vs. LTE&#039;s wireless fibre....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He got his analogy wrong&#8230; Betamax is superior to VHS, it failed because Sony was greedy and wanted big dough for licensing&#8230;</p>
<p>He should probably just say Wimax is the wireless dialup vs. LTE&#8217;s wireless fibre&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hhopper</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507566</link>
		<dc:creator>hhopper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507566</guid>
		<description>LTE would be nice... 150mbps down and 30mbps up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LTE would be nice&#8230; 150mbps down and 30mbps up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507555</link>
		<dc:creator>pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507555</guid>
		<description>Well, after more than 6 months using wimax I can safely say it sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, after more than 6 months using wimax I can safely say it sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gquaglia</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507549</link>
		<dc:creator>gquaglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507549</guid>
		<description>No surprise that soon to be dead Sprint is backing wimax while all the other players are embracing LTE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise that soon to be dead Sprint is backing wimax while all the other players are embracing LTE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdmFubar</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/04/02/nokia-says-wimax-is-wireless-betamax/comment-page-1/#comment-1507535</link>
		<dc:creator>AdmFubar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=45041#comment-1507535</guid>
		<description>all i hear is $$$$ in somoene&#039;s pocket, it sure aint mine...

with just at&amp;t and verizon in control there really wont be any competition.. so there will be high rates for these services..


when googl rolls out their network in about a year or two from now, it might be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all i hear is $$$$ in somoene&#8217;s pocket, it sure aint mine&#8230;</p>
<p>with just at&amp;t and verizon in control there really wont be any competition.. so there will be high rates for these services..</p>
<p>when googl rolls out their network in about a year or two from now, it might be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

