The US Homeland Security Department, under fire for saying US forces returning from the Iraq and Afghan wars were potential right-wing extremist recruits, said Wednesday it honors US veterans.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano sought to douse anger among conservatives and veterans groups like the American Legion over a report from her department warning of a rising threat of right-wing extremism. “We are on the lookout for criminal and terrorist activity but we do not — nor will we ever — monitor ideology or political beliefs,” Napolitano said in a statement amid charges that the department had done just that.
American Legion chief David Rehbein on Tuesday blasted the report as “incomplete, and, I fear, politically-biased” and took special aim at its warning that returning veterans having difficulties reintegrating society could be recruited by right-wing groups for possible terrorist attacks. In a letter to Napolitano, Rehbein underlined the document’s mention of Oklahoma City bombing author Timothy McVeigh’s US Army background and called it “as unfair as using Osama bin Laden as the sole example of Islam.”
The report said that fears of possible new restrictions on firearms, as well as troubled veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, “could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.” Rehbein said the accusation, leveled in an April 7 document designed for local law enforcement officials, was “without any statistical evidence.”
It’s humorous when a government is afraid of the same people they train to kill. Who was it that said people shouldn’t fear their government, but the government should fear the people?
Typical liberal military hatred.
All part of the attack on the fairness doctrine. Once they establish the new enemies of the state, they can go after their voices.
This is shaping up to be 1984, only a few years late…
All part of the attack on conservatives. Once they establish them as the new enemies of the state (or at least President Obama), they can go after their voices with the fairness doctrine.
You liberals can laugh, but someday, if they are vindictive enough, the conservatives might use these tactics on you…
This is shaping up to be 1984, only a few years late…
Nice pick on the Sec DHS O’Mama.
“Who was it that said people shouldn’t fear their government, but the government should fear the people?” – maybe, Marx (Groucho?)
#4
“When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”
-Jefferson
Why would vets who risked their lives to serve and saw their buddies die be hostile to a government who is staffed by hostile people like Napolitano? hmmm
Labeling someone worthy of respect and gratitude as dangerous and unstable is not going to gain you any supporters from vets.
Maybe so-called right wing extremists pose a threat but her warning seems like a bunch of noise similar to the Home Office official in Britain (Jackie Smith) who told Brits to expect certain groups to riot. Seems like justification for a larger DHS budget and more intrusion into our lives (whether you’re right, left or other).
#5. Yes, thank you.
Ah, the Reagan years.
It’s a trial balloon. This administration throws this stuff out to test how much BS the public is ready to take.
Screw Napolitano. She bankrupted our state and then hightailed it out of here right as the shit hit the fan.
I’d expect as much when her boss accuses the military of “air-raiding villages and killing women and children.”
This is ridiculous. We should bring in legislation to give all past and present military personnel immunity from civilian prosecution.
The military is the cornerstone of our society. They define and represent the United States. Our nation’s borders extend to the tips of our soldiers’ gun barrels the world over.
How can anyone doubt them, no matter what a military man did or does. Military men earned that right by being the cream of our society. The best of the best. The rest should just shut up.
anyone who doesn’t think that any unstable person with weapons training is a possible threat is a fool. The same applies whether it’s a vet, a gang member or a meth addict. It’s simple common sense and in no way is an attack on conservatives (the word isn’t even in the document). And it doesn’t even imply that most or even many vets might be dangerous…just that SOME MAY.
Jeez people use your brains once in a while
#13 We have MUCH more to fear from the psycho nuts in D.C. than from ANY serviceman. ANYONE but a fool knows that.
#13 This story is in reference to the report.
video1.washingtontimes.com/video/extremismreport.pdf
I suggest that you read it and see that it explicitly refers to veterans and the threat from right-wing groups. Nowhere does it mention other groups who may be a threat. Unfortunately to many, “right-wing extremist” and “conservative” are synonymous.
I think the most telling is this quote from the document:
“The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing* terrorists are currently planning acts of violence”
So this is another example of DHS trying to fear monger…
The answer to the question you asked was the same people who gave us the right to keep and bear arms.
Well, let’s think about this.
They have anger issues, they are armed and they have been fed a steady diet of Rush Limbaugh on radio.
Sound like Timothy McVeigh to me!
(I’m joking of course. But Ive heard that the right wing radical groups DO recruit heavily among vets — so THEY obviously thing vets are potential domestic terrorists.)
“The purpose of Terror, is to Terrorise”. V. I. Leinn
Change you can believe in!