Nuclear fears prompt Pakistan to prepare attack on Taleban – Times Online

The Taliban are relentless and the Pakistani’s may not have the will power to stop them. They already gave them concessions rather than resistance.

Thousands of Pakistani troops were massing for an assault on Taleban positions 65 miles from the country’s capital last night after giving the insurgents 24 hours to withdraw from their advanced positions or face attack.

The threat of force follows a stern warning from American policymakers that Islamabad was doing too little to stem a growing militant insurgency.




  1. hhopper says:

    The Taliban definitely needs to be stopped. What if they got their hands on a nuclear weapon?

  2. Ah_Yea says:

    So let me get this straight. We send good men over to Afghanistan to remove the Taliban because they supported the guy who backed 911.

    They leave Afghanistan and set up shop in Pakistan. Now they are possibly going to take over that place and have nukes.

    In other words, getting their asses kicked out of Afghanistan was the best thing that ever happened to them…

  3. sargasso says:

    #2. Yes. The Pakistan military have so far, been protecting the Taliban from cross-border attacks by the Allies, and feeding shared intelligence to the Taliban. I have a feeling that the outcome of this conflict has already been decided.

  4. #2
    oh it gets better the Reagan Doctrine where the U.S. provided support to just about any anti-communist resistance forces helped get them started. We made the Taleban in a force to be reckoned with.

    Almost every time we go around thinking the enemy of our enemy is our friend, it comes back to bite us in the butt. Lets hope Obama is smarted than Reagan Clinton and the Shrubbery Twins on this.

  5. SparkyOne says:

    I am mighty glad I learned to duck and cover as a child.

  6. chuck says:

    I refer to my previous post: Nuke both Pakistan and Afghanistan. Kill ‘em all and let Allah sort it out.

  7. bill says:

    I don’t agree… with #6. I would support the Pakistan army, unless you want to go there and take care of business yourself. Something about the “enemy of my enemy is my friend? ” We should support them in any way we can.
    WTF? Time for the ‘only superpower’ to start acting like one.
    Let the culling begin!

  8. Andy Lowry says:

    Dear Mr. John C. Dvorak,

    Far more dangerous and frightening to me than loose nukes is the superfluous apostrophe in “Pakistani’s.”

    I mean this in a loving and kindly way, as I’m sure you know.

    Thanks,

    Andy

  9. Ah_Yea says:

    You all are aware that if Islamabad falls to the taliban, that there will be a major preemptive strike by India against pakistan, right?

    India in no way can allow the taliban to get their hands on nuclear weapons.

    We are talking a huge, major and possibly nuclear regional war.

  10. Joe says:

    so thats the limited nuclear war thats been predicted for 2009.

  11. Greg Allen says:

    >> sargasso said,
    >> The Pakistan military have so far, been protecting the Taliban from cross-border attacks by the Allies, and feeding shared intelligence to the Taliban.

    Wow you guys have a simplistic understanding of this conflict.

    If the Pakistan military is protecting the Taliban, please explain this article. (or the zillion like it reported everywhere if you were paying attention)

    “10 Pakistani Soldiers Killed in Battle with al-Qaida”

    Pakistani military authorities say 10 of their soldiers were killed Wednesday, in a gun battle with suspected al-Qaida fighters, in tribal areas, near the Afghan border. At least two Pakistani military officers and a number of al-Qaida fighters are reported to have been killed in the incident.

  12. bob says:

    But Obama was going to fix it all!

    And I seem to remember being told over and over again that the Taleban were not so bad. Of course that was when Bush was against them.

  13. Selvy says:

    The problem with Afghanistan started when we pulled out after the Soviets left. Our objectives were met, we didn’t have a need or desire to govern/control. So the wrong people made it to the top, assisted by the Pakistani ISI because they were seen as possible allies against India (and a great excuse to get their own people some combat training).

    The situation in Pakistan has occrred because the same mindset is in play. The military and ISI are loathe to let the Taliban get eliminated, they’re so focused on India. Also, what passes for a democratic government thinks appeasement will work when it hasn’t. The only time the Taliban (or any Islamist group) proposes to agree to a cease-fire or anything else is in order to consolidate their holdings and build up for the next offensive. It is never ending, there is no concept as peaceful co-existence. Nor ‘moderate’ Taliban. That is the contrivance of journalists and diplomats.

    We can’t rush in ourselves, that isn’t a real option. Which leaves the Pakistanis themselves. The military has to see the Talibani and Al Qaeda types as a threat to their own power, and take action. It won’t do anything for the government itself.

    Worst case scenario is that Pakistan ceases to exist as a nation-state. With militants so obviously on the other side of the border, India will have no choice but to reabsorb parts of Pakistan. They’ll leave the truly lawless portions off their map. That will be for the world to clean up if they like.

    And no, Obama isn’t ‘smarter’. He is smart, but intelligence means little when strong ideological tendencies and wishful thinking get in the way of policy making. You cannot charm your enemies into submission, every nation has their own interests and that has to be served first. This is not a job for Carter II.

  14. Special Ed says:

    #1 – What would they launch it from, a camel? At best they would nuke India and we’d get all of the outsourced jobs back.

  15. Sister Mary Hand Grenade of Quiet Reflection says:

    Should I go buy duct tape and plastic for the convent windows?

  16. Faxon says:

    I guess a “RAGHEAD SHAKER” app would get me arrested in Britain, right?

  17. Faxon says:

    Think of it as population control. We certainly need it, don’t we?

  18. #12
    reality check bob

    Bob said
    And I seem to remember being told over and over again that the Taleban were not so bad. Of course that was when Bush was against them.

    Bob show me a link where Obama or anyone on his campaign staff said “The Taleban were not so bad” All you will find is Fox/Rush personal interpretations of Obama saying he was willing to engage some of leaders we are not so keen on in conversations without preconditions.

    That’s a far cry from “The Taleban were not so bad” Like all large diverse groups some Taliban are worse than others who knows some might be worth talking to.

    So far Obama is being the President his campaigning said he would be and deciding the big stuff the way he said he would. That should make the people who voted for him with realistic expectations satisfied and those whom he was not to there liking just as disappointed as on election day. The only ones who should be disappointed are the ones that had unrealistic expectations.

  19. RBG says:

    How long will it be before a nation run by Taliban/Al Qaeda types develop a nuke, just like Pakistan, and uses it to deliver Allah’s will? (I guess that would be ok as long as it was democratically placed in power.)

    Then ask yourself why the universe isn’t teeming with intelligent life as Drake’s equation postulates and as would be expected after millions of years of expansion opportunity.

    RBG

  20. Judge Jewdy says:

    #19 – Aw who gives a shit, lets get it over with.



Bad Behavior has blocked 25834 access attempts in the last 7 days.