California’s Govinator is for debating it. A majority in a US poll favor legalizing it. And then there’s Oaksterdam.

While there might be additional costs for dealing with those who can’t handle responsible toking — just as we now have with alcoholics, etc — they are vastly outweighed by the savings in then unneeded prisons, law enforcement, and so on, plus there’s the potential windfall in tax money for ailing local, state and fed governments.

If there should be changes, how far should we go? Simple decriminalization or full legalization? Should it be taxed like cigarettes and booze, both of which are far more dangerous, but legal? You know where Crackpot and Buzzkill stand. Where do you?

Are Americans really ready to consider legalizing marijuana? This week, California’s governor said it was time to debate the issue, and a new nationwide poll suggests a majority of voters favor decriminalizing the drug.

While legalization advocates say they’ve never seen such widespread public support for reforming marijuana laws, they still don’t expect drug policy to change overnight. But, they say, the country appears to be at tipping point in how it views recreational use of marijuana, which is now legal in 13 states for medically-approved use.

“We are actually talking about historic highs when it comes to public support of taxing and regulating marijuana for adult consumption,” says Paul Armentano, deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). But, he adds, “the most difficult task is how you convert public sentiment into public policy.”

In Washington, Mr. Armentano says, politicians are still not ready to rethink US drug policy.


Changing Marijuana Laws

View Results
Create a Poll




  1. Paddy-O says:

    # 62 Hugh Ripper said, “Your pathetic attempt to link marijuana ‘addiction’…”

    I never said anything about addiction. Fail.

  2. soundwash says:

    you know..aside from the usual politics
    blocking decriminalization,i bet more than anything 2 prime reasons keeping it illegal are:

    1) cannabis almost completly blocks any mind
    control techniques, and..

    2) it was found in the 70′s that the THC in smoke can shrink/inhibit and/or stop many forms of brain tumors (cancer)

    the medical industry would lose billions a year
    in toxic cancer therapies and surgeries, if it was known all you needed was some smoke that you could grow yourself if you wanted to, to inhibit/stop tumors.

    -and well, government and consumer marketing industries would have a cow if people knew there was a relatively simple way to inhibit
    the common place mind control/brainwashing of the masses that advertising and political campaigns engage in.

    this might explain why my liberal, pot-smoking, non-tv watching friends are immune to the hypnotic trance of the obama
    campaign.

    my “straight” liberal buddies are only now
    starting to complain of being mislead by his
    campaign. -and only slightly.

    imagine the repubs having with a new campaign
    sogan:

    “a toke a day keeps the lying liberal scum
    away” -ha!

    -s

  3. soundwash says:

    /afterthought

    -lol… could explain why Adam so clearly
    see’s the conspiracy and corruption in government and many other things, while John C. is only now begrudgingly starting to agree
    with him on many fronts.

    -s



Bad Behavior has blocked 26275 access attempts in the last 7 days.