Hitachi Develops RFID Powder | Wired.com This is just peachy.
Conspiracy-minded types can thank Hitachi for something new to worry about — RFID chips so small you’ll never know they’re there.
The electronics conglomerate recently showed a prototype of an RFID chip measuring a .05 millimeters square and 5 microns thick, about the size of a grain of sand. They expect to have ‘em on the market in two or three years. The chips are packed with 128 bits of static memory, enough to hold a 38-digit ID number.
Adam Curry discussed this on the last No Agenda and I pooh-poohed it. More interesting is the spec that has the dot holding a 38 digit number. Following Moore’s law this storage becomes a dossier or a 155,000 word novel in less than 20 years.
the “American” version of this is called Smartdust.
other words to search on would be nanodust & nanoradio. add +military to see all military projects related to this stuff.
iirc, one the “above board” uses of this stuff
was to track animal migrations. -use your own imagination.
they have been working on “dust” the size of blood cells for other interesting applications. -powered
by something akin to the ATP in your cells.
also, for some really easy to understand far out nano concepts, search on “Ray Kurzweil+nano” and Ray+Kurzweil+nano+video -this will give you a wealth
of “commercial uses envisioned” for smart/nano dust.
i believe it was spawned partially from UC Berkely’s carbon nanotube “AM/FM receiver” breakthroughs a while back.
one carbon nanotube will resonate at given frequency
and make a good receiver. put a “tube within a tube”
and you get something that will use resonant energy to transmit.
this stuff was in DARPA’s crosshairs back in 1999.
i’m sure you will find something on their site
conspiracy 101:
-consider: they have this stuff down to less than a penny per “dot” -and $2.3trillion was missing in the pentagon (that we know of) on 9/10/2001. -no doubt some of that was “highly leveraged”
now, add this dust to the aerosol campaign (chemtrail) and its likely parts of the USA
have already been walking around with this stuff in them. -you know, to track the “migration habits” of Homo Sapiens…
imo, typically, major breakthroughs like this have already been in use in the military sector for 10+ years before it “breakthroughs to the civilian sector” -since it’s usually DOE or DARPA that
funds the work.
food for thought
-s
Stops jock itch too!
Something about these things being so small that they can be sprinkled on ice cream that doesn’t make sense. It’s like trying to keep track of dust compared to keeping track of the whole house. I don’t buy it.
I just love how everyone automatically hates RFID…take off your foil hats!
RFID tags of this type reflect some tiny amount of the signal applied to them, and the nature of the reflection is determined by the data in the tag. OK, something this small can only reflect a miniscule amount of RF, meaning the read distance is very, very short. It’s probably a bit longer than the distance for reading the magnetic strip on the back of your credit card.
Two, these chips, like most others, don’t work directly on metal or under any amount of flesh or moisture. Inside your body they are just as useful as an optical barcode within your colon.
RFID on this blog is like listening to those who think there are cameras in their cable boxes. This is new tech that relies heavily on old tech, something very few of you whippersnappers have the patience to learn these days….RF propagation. (I work in the tech school industry, and I know that this subject is not taught much these days)
I come from England and there is a lot on this blog about CCTV and the fascist state. I don’t think it matters how good the tech becomes in the UK, the government is so incompetent that they can never track anybody. Everybody is filmed on CCTV but then they loss 5 million people from the child benefit database.
Saw an article last year in Scientific American about them developing this and…ah-ah-
cHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!
‘scuse me.
Did you get the number of that particle, btw?