<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Smiling Allowed&#8230; on Virginia Drivers License Sez DMV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:53:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphone for free</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1758205</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone for free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1758205</guid>
		<description>im often roaming all across the internet almost all of the time which means that I have a propensity to browse considerably, which isn&#039;t typically a good matter as nearly all of the web sites I see are made up of pointless rubbish copied from various other internet sites a thousand times, on the other hand I&#039;ll hand it to ya this website is in truth enjoyable and even seems to have some original substance, so thank you for breaking the trends of solely replicating other people&#039;s blogs  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im often roaming all across the internet almost all of the time which means that I have a propensity to browse considerably, which isn&#8217;t typically a good matter as nearly all of the web sites I see are made up of pointless rubbish copied from various other internet sites a thousand times, on the other hand I&#8217;ll hand it to ya this website is in truth enjoyable and even seems to have some original substance, so thank you for breaking the trends of solely replicating other people&#8217;s blogs  <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobe_bear5</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1674539</link>
		<dc:creator>bobe_bear5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 06:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1674539</guid>
		<description>I think its ignorant that they wont give ya license to ya til 30 days i mean i payed almost 40 bucks for freakin things!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its ignorant that they wont give ya license to ya til 30 days i mean i payed almost 40 bucks for freakin things!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1532363</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1532363</guid>
		<description>Summary of a study on eye surgery vs iris scan accuracy: 
&lt;i&gt;Cataract surgeries change iris textures in such a way that iris recognition systems, which perform mathematical comparisons of textural biometric features, are able to detect these changes and sometimes even discard a pre-enrolled iris considering it an impostor. In our study, re-enrollment proved to be a feasible procedure.

...
&lt;/i&gt;
From a biometric FAQ:
&lt;i&gt;
Colored contact lenses can reduce the accuracy of iris scans, as can the use of drugs that dilate your pupils.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Summary of a study on eye surgery vs iris scan accuracy:<br />
<i>Cataract surgeries change iris textures in such a way that iris recognition systems, which perform mathematical comparisons of textural biometric features, are able to detect these changes and sometimes even discard a pre-enrolled iris considering it an impostor. In our study, re-enrollment proved to be a feasible procedure.</p>
<p>&#8230;<br />
</i><br />
From a biometric FAQ:<br />
<i><br />
Colored contact lenses can reduce the accuracy of iris scans, as can the use of drugs that dilate your pupils.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brm</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1532291</link>
		<dc:creator>brm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1532291</guid>
		<description>#32:

&quot;Iris damage is rare&quot;

Can you still read the iris through a cataract? Or a colored contact lens?

dunno, just asking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#32:</p>
<p>&#8220;Iris damage is rare&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you still read the iris through a cataract? Or a colored contact lens?</p>
<p>dunno, just asking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olo Baggins of Bywater</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1532090</link>
		<dc:creator>Olo Baggins of Bywater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1532090</guid>
		<description>#28, ummm, that&#039;s incorrect. Iris damage is rare, otherwise it&#039;ll never change throughout your life. Fingerprints are easily damaged, permanently and temporarily. And fingerprints are easily faked, too. 

DNA is irrelevant.

#31...This subject reminds me of the RFID paranoia prevalent on this blog. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#28, ummm, that&#8217;s incorrect. Iris damage is rare, otherwise it&#8217;ll never change throughout your life. Fingerprints are easily damaged, permanently and temporarily. And fingerprints are easily faked, too. </p>
<p>DNA is irrelevant.</p>
<p>#31&#8230;This subject reminds me of the RFID paranoia prevalent on this blog. <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geezopete</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1532051</link>
		<dc:creator>geezopete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 22:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1532051</guid>
		<description>What are you people trying to hide? What are you doing that you don&#039;t want people to be able to identify you? Do you think it would be fine for you to walk around wearing a ski mask all the time? That&#039;s essentially what you&#039;re asking for: &quot;I want to be unidentifiable to the police should I commit a crime&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you people trying to hide? What are you doing that you don&#8217;t want people to be able to identify you? Do you think it would be fine for you to walk around wearing a ski mask all the time? That&#8217;s essentially what you&#8217;re asking for: &#8220;I want to be unidentifiable to the police should I commit a crime&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531981</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531981</guid>
		<description>We have this in Canada now - you can&#039;t smile for passport or driver&#039;s license photos.

Interestingly, you can insist on wearing a face-covering veil and burka if are a female Muslim. (Or if you are pretending to be one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have this in Canada now &#8211; you can&#8217;t smile for passport or driver&#8217;s license photos.</p>
<p>Interestingly, you can insist on wearing a face-covering veil and burka if are a female Muslim. (Or if you are pretending to be one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knotta Trole</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531965</link>
		<dc:creator>Knotta Trole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 16:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531965</guid>
		<description>&quot;We are being governed by idiots.&quot;

IN GENERAL, these guys are who were voted in. We get the government we deserve.

BTW this means all we have to do to avoid face recognition is go around with a sh*t eating grin all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We are being governed by idiots.&#8221;</p>
<p>IN GENERAL, these guys are who were voted in. We get the government we deserve.</p>
<p>BTW this means all we have to do to avoid face recognition is go around with a sh*t eating grin all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531938</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531938</guid>
		<description>11 Olo Baggins of Bywater said,  &quot;and only an iris scan is reliable over time.&quot;


Umm, no.  Eye damage can occur.  It&#039;s not really any better than finger print in that respect. DNA is FAR more reliable over time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11 Olo Baggins of Bywater said,  &#8220;and only an iris scan is reliable over time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Umm, no.  Eye damage can occur.  It&#8217;s not really any better than finger print in that respect. DNA is FAR more reliable over time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531937</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531937</guid>
		<description>all your smiles are belong to us</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all your smiles are belong to us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bb</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531934</link>
		<dc:creator>bb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531934</guid>
		<description>No smiling in the first state.  (Delaware)  Also, no glasses - my driver&#039;s license picture is the only picture of me without glasses taken in the last 50 years.  Yeah, I started wearing them early.

But I wonder, I am so near-sighted and with a high astigmatism that my eye shape, size, and placement is different when viewed through the glass lenses as opposed to not.  Will that invalidate the face recognition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No smiling in the first state.  (Delaware)  Also, no glasses &#8211; my driver&#8217;s license picture is the only picture of me without glasses taken in the last 50 years.  Yeah, I started wearing them early.</p>
<p>But I wonder, I am so near-sighted and with a high astigmatism that my eye shape, size, and placement is different when viewed through the glass lenses as opposed to not.  Will that invalidate the face recognition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusanmal</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531924</link>
		<dc:creator>dusanmal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531924</guid>
		<description>@#, eaze: &quot;its just a more accurate way of identifying people’s faces. it has nothing to do with civil liberties and should not be clouded with them.&quot;

Govt. should not collect biometrics data from  citizens at the point which citizens can&#039;t avoid for normal daily lives: ex. drivers license. Such collection is what makes this civil liberty issue. I don&#039;t mind Govt. collecting biometric photos of convicted criminals or of people in charge of extreme security sites/data/... who work for the Govt. But collecting biometrics from my drivers license photo is where it crosses the line from free society to police state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#, eaze: &#8220;its just a more accurate way of identifying people’s faces. it has nothing to do with civil liberties and should not be clouded with them.&#8221;</p>
<p>Govt. should not collect biometrics data from  citizens at the point which citizens can&#8217;t avoid for normal daily lives: ex. drivers license. Such collection is what makes this civil liberty issue. I don&#8217;t mind Govt. collecting biometric photos of convicted criminals or of people in charge of extreme security sites/data/&#8230; who work for the Govt. But collecting biometrics from my drivers license photo is where it crosses the line from free society to police state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The0ne</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531919</link>
		<dc:creator>The0ne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531919</guid>
		<description>China&#039;s involved, I just know it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China&#8217;s involved, I just know it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert_Bear</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert_Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531917</guid>
		<description>#21 Total rubbish. 
DVLA has nothing to do with vehicle ownership. If you buy a car with finance, the finance company own the car until you&#039;ve paid up. You cannot give ownership of a car to the DVLA if you don&#039;t actually own it yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21 Total rubbish.<br />
DVLA has nothing to do with vehicle ownership. If you buy a car with finance, the finance company own the car until you&#8217;ve paid up. You cannot give ownership of a car to the DVLA if you don&#8217;t actually own it yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dallas</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/05/30/no-smiling-allowedon-virginia-drivers-license-sez-dmv/comment-page-2/#comment-1531910</link>
		<dc:creator>Dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=49864#comment-1531910</guid>
		<description>Cheney as asked to smile in order to get within the dull face range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheney as asked to smile in order to get within the dull face range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

