<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Courthouse religious display ruled unconstitutional – of course</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/</link>
	<description>General interest observations and true web-log.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:43:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, the dangerous infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537449</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, the dangerous infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537449</guid>
		<description>#93 Triple oops!!!

I plugged this into the wrong window.  You&#039;d be impressed if you saw it in the right thread ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#93 Triple oops!!!</p>
<p>I plugged this into the wrong window.  You&#8217;d be impressed if you saw it in the right thread <img src='http://www.dvorak.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, the dangerous infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537448</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, the dangerous infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537448</guid>
		<description>I think the most telling moment of the video is when she is on the ground, shrieking in agony, and the cop yells &quot;Put your hands behind your back or you&#039;ll be tased again!&quot;

To me, that indicates a desire that goes well beyond mere control of the situation, which he already has at that point.  He&#039;s insisting that she completely submit to his authority and command.  By that time, she may very well be incapable of the muscle control necessary to put her hands behind her back, but the officer has expressly left himself the option to tase her again if her muscles can&#039;t comply.

They&#039;re both quite lucky that she didn&#039;t break her hip when she fell to the ground.  Many women her age never recover from a hip fracture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the most telling moment of the video is when she is on the ground, shrieking in agony, and the cop yells &#8220;Put your hands behind your back or you&#8217;ll be tased again!&#8221;</p>
<p>To me, that indicates a desire that goes well beyond mere control of the situation, which he already has at that point.  He&#8217;s insisting that she completely submit to his authority and command.  By that time, she may very well be incapable of the muscle control necessary to put her hands behind her back, but the officer has expressly left himself the option to tase her again if her muscles can&#8217;t comply.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re both quite lucky that she didn&#8217;t break her hip when she fell to the ground.  Many women her age never recover from a hip fracture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hyrneson</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537438</link>
		<dc:creator>Hyrneson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537438</guid>
		<description>&quot;This crap never seems to end, does it?&quot;

I&#039;ll tell you what, when a court doesn&#039;t put a granite marker stating &quot;There shall be no other God before me&quot; as inspiration for how law should be done, then yeah, this crap will end.

It&#039;s this basic lack of understanding that keeps the Creationist thinking that Creationism is a science.  Theology is neither secular law nor science and neither should be substituted as a base for the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This crap never seems to end, does it?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what, when a court doesn&#8217;t put a granite marker stating &#8220;There shall be no other God before me&#8221; as inspiration for how law should be done, then yeah, this crap will end.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s this basic lack of understanding that keeps the Creationist thinking that Creationism is a science.  Theology is neither secular law nor science and neither should be substituted as a base for the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537283</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537283</guid>
		<description>Always good to post that there is no such thing or need of god, and that if he did exist, he would only be a powerful alien to defeat.

That cornerstone reiterated, the stupidity and evil or religion has long been noticed and therefore announced as declining as man becomes more aware.  It just ain&#039;t happening.  Religions are consolidating, once there were many, fewer now.  This feeds fanaticism.

Biology v Theology==which is more likely to end culture?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to post that there is no such thing or need of god, and that if he did exist, he would only be a powerful alien to defeat.</p>
<p>That cornerstone reiterated, the stupidity and evil or religion has long been noticed and therefore announced as declining as man becomes more aware.  It just ain&#8217;t happening.  Religions are consolidating, once there were many, fewer now.  This feeds fanaticism.</p>
<p>Biology v Theology==which is more likely to end culture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ArianeB</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537276</link>
		<dc:creator>ArianeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537276</guid>
		<description>#2 &quot;It represents divine authority for the rule of law and of self governance.&quot;

IMHO, we should replace all public displays of the 10 commandments, with the 10 most important laws of physics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2 &#8220;It represents divine authority for the rule of law and of self governance.&#8221;</p>
<p>IMHO, we should replace all public displays of the 10 commandments, with the 10 most important laws of physics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmeyers</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1537111</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmeyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1537111</guid>
		<description>Thanks Fusion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Fusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536942</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536942</guid>
		<description>#71, Meyers,

Part II

As I said in #87, we basically agree. 

Where I lean towards the subjugation side and opposite the morality side is most of the stories teach no morals.

Sodom and Gommorah? No morals, just do what God tells you to.

Jacob&#039;s ladder? Don&#039;t do drugs before bedtime?

Jonah and the big fish / whale? I tell you, ya jes gotta have faith. (And maybe after Faith, you should try Becky)

Noah and the great flood? So if you don&#039;t believe in God, he is going to kill you.

The Good Samaritan is the only one I can think of where there is some morality.

I should add I enjoyed your post. Well framed arguments and fun to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#71, Meyers,</p>
<p>Part II</p>
<p>As I said in #87, we basically agree. </p>
<p>Where I lean towards the subjugation side and opposite the morality side is most of the stories teach no morals.</p>
<p>Sodom and Gommorah? No morals, just do what God tells you to.</p>
<p>Jacob&#8217;s ladder? Don&#8217;t do drugs before bedtime?</p>
<p>Jonah and the big fish / whale? I tell you, ya jes gotta have faith. (And maybe after Faith, you should try Becky)</p>
<p>Noah and the great flood? So if you don&#8217;t believe in God, he is going to kill you.</p>
<p>The Good Samaritan is the only one I can think of where there is some morality.</p>
<p>I should add I enjoyed your post. Well framed arguments and fun to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536929</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536929</guid>
		<description>#71, Meyers,

The first part I think we agree but are just using different views and words.

&lt;i&gt;Atheism means you don’t believe in religion.&lt;/i&gt;

I stopped to respond right there. 

First, and very important, &lt;i&gt;atheist&lt;/i&gt; is the word used to describe me by someone else. I don&#039;t accept that word anymore than I consider myself an &lt;i&gt;infidel&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;gentile&lt;/i&gt;.

Call me what you want, those are your definitions, terms, and conditions. Just don&#039;t expect me to agree with those terms.

I now return to finish your post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#71, Meyers,</p>
<p>The first part I think we agree but are just using different views and words.</p>
<p><i>Atheism means you don’t believe in religion.</i></p>
<p>I stopped to respond right there. </p>
<p>First, and very important, <i>atheist</i> is the word used to describe me by someone else. I don&#8217;t accept that word anymore than I consider myself an <i>infidel</i> or <i>gentile</i>.</p>
<p>Call me what you want, those are your definitions, terms, and conditions. Just don&#8217;t expect me to agree with those terms.</p>
<p>I now return to finish your post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great American</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536827</link>
		<dc:creator>Great American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536827</guid>
		<description>I believe in a living Constitution DUR DUR DUR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in a living Constitution DUR DUR DUR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great American</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536826</link>
		<dc:creator>Great American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536826</guid>
		<description>This Blog is bullshit...where&#039;s the real news?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Blog is bullshit&#8230;where&#8217;s the real news?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Patso</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536817</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Patso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536817</guid>
		<description>Thing is, if they _really_ wanted to have (and keep) a display of the 10 Commandments by their courthouse, they know how to do it: include it as one of several lawgiving scenarios from history. But that&#039;s not the main idea here. 

Their main purpose was to start a fight.

There was a hilarious bit on last evening&#039;s rerun of the old Drew Carey improv show &quot;Whose Line Is It Anyway?&quot; In a game called &quot;Scenes from a Hat&quot; in which random scenarios are pulled from a hat and acted out by the cast, Carey pulled out one that said, &quot;Something to say that will _always_ start a fight.&quot; So Ryan Stiles walked out to center stage and said, &quot;... Y&#039; wanna fight?&quot;

That&#039;s exactly what the Haskell County, Oklahoma commissioners have done here. They don&#039;t really care about the marker at all, except as a vehicle to stir up trouble and rile up &quot;the base,&quot; and I&#039;m always amazed that none of the news reports talk about that angle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing is, if they _really_ wanted to have (and keep) a display of the 10 Commandments by their courthouse, they know how to do it: include it as one of several lawgiving scenarios from history. But that&#8217;s not the main idea here. </p>
<p>Their main purpose was to start a fight.</p>
<p>There was a hilarious bit on last evening&#8217;s rerun of the old Drew Carey improv show &#8220;Whose Line Is It Anyway?&#8221; In a game called &#8220;Scenes from a Hat&#8221; in which random scenarios are pulled from a hat and acted out by the cast, Carey pulled out one that said, &#8220;Something to say that will _always_ start a fight.&#8221; So Ryan Stiles walked out to center stage and said, &#8220;&#8230; Y&#8217; wanna fight?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly what the Haskell County, Oklahoma commissioners have done here. They don&#8217;t really care about the marker at all, except as a vehicle to stir up trouble and rile up &#8220;the base,&#8221; and I&#8217;m always amazed that none of the news reports talk about that angle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary, the dangerous infidel</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536783</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary, the dangerous infidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536783</guid>
		<description>#82, by mentioning Jesus so much, I think Obama is still just trying to reassure people that he&#039;s not the secret Muslim terrorist that far-right wackos implied he was.  Has it worked yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#82, by mentioning Jesus so much, I think Obama is still just trying to reassure people that he&#8217;s not the secret Muslim terrorist that far-right wackos implied he was.  Has it worked yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeN</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536768</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536768</guid>
		<description>So it is unconstitutional for Barack Obama to be talking about Jesus so much?  He&#039;s done it more than George Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it is unconstitutional for Barack Obama to be talking about Jesus so much?  He&#8217;s done it more than George Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmeyers</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-5/#comment-1536754</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmeyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536754</guid>
		<description>@Nimby

I knew someone would mention Scientology.

Still ... they aren&#039;t killing (a lot) of people as far as I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nimby</p>
<p>I knew someone would mention Scientology.</p>
<p>Still &#8230; they aren&#8217;t killing (a lot) of people as far as I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nimby</title>
		<link>http://www.dvorak.org/blog/2009/06/09/courthouse-religious-display-ruled-unconstitutional-%e2%80%93-of-course/comment-page-4/#comment-1536734</link>
		<dc:creator>Nimby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dvorak.org/blog/?p=50541#comment-1536734</guid>
		<description>Oh, oh, oh: I forgot:
Mormons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, oh, oh: I forgot:<br />
Mormons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

