David Letterman’s hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
Speaking of anti-Semitism, it’s Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who’ve gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
Wrong! It’s the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that’ll outdo even Hitler’s by stating that “Judah hath dealt treacherously” and “the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this” and asks “Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?”
Haven’t evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and persons perceived to be Jewish? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard and Kathy Griffin) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin’s continuing “crucifixion”!
While David, Sandra, and Kathy are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
(For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in “Separation of Raunch and State,” “Michael the Narc-Angel,” and “Bible Verses Obama Avoids.”)

Hillary needs the women’s vote to get in in 2012. She’s got to make sure the last thing people remember about Sarah is very negative. Her news media will make Sarah a non-person from now on.

Sarah herself is getting out of the governor’s chair so when the economy collapses none of the fallout can be held against her by Hillary’s media.

Rahm is in charge of Obama’s cabinet — and is a Clintonista. The future back-stabbing will be interesting.

It appears you are doing exactly what you accuse Fusion of doing. Did he touch the wrong nerve?

Since the names are at the beginning of the comment, why not just skip over his if they bother you that much?

I’m curious too. Why would you make spurious claims then walk away from them instead of backing them up? Yup, another right wing nut tactic.

*

I couldn’t give two constipated farts about her. It has been the far right wing of the Republican Party, the “fringe element”, that loved her and she played to. This fringe group got their little weenies all exited whenever and where ever she spoke. They would have followed her to the grave because she winked at them. But they are not the moderate, moneyed group of conservatives the Republican Party wants to appeal to. Generally (and I am generalizing) they are the group of religious nutbags and Liebertarians that almost ruined the Republican Party.

The Republican Party leaders tolerated her as she excited the troops. Yet they saw her lack of intellect and compassion. Any national election with her would be detrimental to the party as a whole. She reminded everyone too much of Bush in a time when that legacy is way too toxic. In short, they didn’t see her as a winner.

Palin was just a small time player trying to make in the big league. She couldn’t cut it because she wasn’t the right material. Argue that all you want but it won’t change the fact. Personally I wish she had stayed around as she polarized the electorate into the extreme right wing element and normal people. This also galvanized the center and left to stop the neo-cons and religious nuts.

http://1260.am/programming/hosts/bios/?host=26

Sounds like you would favor taking some of the stimulus money and building ovens to get rid of people you feel are inferior to your vast elitist intelligence. Another man did that in Germany last century.

This country was built on all people having a right to hold their own ideas and views even if they differ from our own. If your ideas and views are better then they will win out. But the discourse should be carried out in a civil manner instead of this vile personal attacks under taken by so many on the left like yourself.

Using her style and speech patterns and family to mock her is fine if it does the job. The ends really are what’s important…don’t go feeling sorry for her, she’d put you in a Jesus Reeducation camp in a heartbeat.

Capiche?

And please, don’t just say it’s because she deserves it. She never has had power and might not ever.

Fusion is acting like the 9-year-old who can’t believe how funny he is and keeps repeating the same playground insult for a week. Except that he’s been doing it for a lot longer.

Rush is easy enough to hack apart on the merist, you just make the left look petty and unimaginative.

I suggest that people stop responding to little Fusion-chan until he comes up with some non-ad-hominem insults.

Maybe next time there is a site update, we could get an “ignore” button.

If we just move on these cretins will just vote for another Bush.

The “non-politician” turned out to be a politician after all. But now all of that is behind her, and the real reason she is resigning is so she can enter a different competition…

http://mrsalaskapageant.com/

As for the headline on this blog post, she’s probably no more insane than any other person who talks to the creator of the universe. This time, the voice in her head told her to resign. How can I possibly disagree with the wisdom of that?

I went to usa today’s website’s Palin section and didn’t see any story with “palin flameout” as the headline. Where is it?

Say what?

You condemn everyone yet offer nothing as evidence. You claim the US Today article makes conclusions but doesn’t report. First, WHAT EFFEN US TODAY REPORT? You don’t link to one or even tell us which one. Was it an op-ed, a column, under a by-line, or AP?

You made the claim, you supply the evidence. Until then this is just more sour grapes from the “Nailin Palin” crowd.

How about USA Today; “Palins Flameout”. This is clear intent to draw conclusions, not report. It’s the kind of language that is used when you want people to think a certain thing. Usually, when someone steps down or makes a political mistake it’s self minimizing and there’s no smear campaign needed. But a few people like Palin there’s a doubt about whether this action is going to minimize her so the left decides that a smear campaign is warranted, just to make sure.