The only real disaster here is that oil/gas/coal companies are a static target and the science community are shooting with both barrels to create a lot of fervor and hike up the research funding – scientists gotta’ eat dude…!

I don’t dispute that the environment is being polluted but so what? It’s inevitable that the human race implodes and kills itself due to it’s collective aggressive greedy nature, what does the earth care. The planet will rejuvenate itself once the infrastructure is given time to naturally.

The only real positive, effective and sustainable way to cut down pollution of the planets’ ecosystem is to restrict the growth of the populous! Stop the uneducated, young, elderly, poor, middle-class, wealthy, religious and stupid classes of society having children at will/accidentally! Bring in enforced abortion where countries cannot sustain the growth of it’s population – in every nation. Cut the amount of unnecessary births which result in over population and a massive drain on the resources available. Lower the numbers overall.

People are the problem not the technology [possibly one in the same] – just halt the rabbit like spread of the human race instead of flying all over the world and pontificating, over-taxing companies or berating corporations that are only doing what’s natural to companies – making money!

To effect the message of global decay, stop producing the damaging element to the environment – people, not CO2!!

Ya know, Cheerios now have to be labeled as a drug. Coffee causes strokes, but now is now a good defense for Alzheimer. And of course Vitamin C, it’s good, but it’s also worthless.

It seems that some scientists, while smart and talented, are so caught up in their little world, their vision gets limited so ya end up with, “…man is bad, green is good, but too many trees is also bad”.

It’s hard to plan for the future with that kind of scientific information.

Do you believe what’s in the Bible?

I guess that’s just religious activists using an oral history as an authority.

Which is a BAD thing, right? Now I’m confused.

Some people don’t like change.
Other people are greedy.
The greedy people like to make the people who don’t like change, feel guilty. To make them believe that the change is all their fault. The greedy people know that once these people feel guilty, they’ll want to ‘fix it’. The greedy people tell you that the only way to resolve this guilt (and ‘fix it’) is to do what they say.

Other people may or may not like change, but they tolerate it.
They show patience and compassion towards those who are afraid of change.
They call the greedy people crooks.
For this effort they are given all sorts of mean nasty labels by the greedy crooks who stay in power by keeping everyone ignorant.

The sun will rise, the sun will set. Man does not need to pay extra taxes or do other silly things because of this ‘change’. If you do as the crooks tell you, you will still watch the sun rise and set, but you will be poor and the crooks will be rich.

The same applies as to why it is now called “climate change” rather than global warming. When the warming was debunked, they shifted marketing/pr gears and rebranded it as “climate change”.

That means one was doctored for effect.

Exactly!!!! What’s your point? Don’t read the cutline added by the publication or web site, look at the label on the image:

Sea Ice September 21, 2005
Sea Ice September 16, 2007

Is it your point that’s NOT where the sea ice was on those dates? What possible evidence could you have? Did you take your own measurements from your own satellite?

Are you saying NASA is a giant conspiracy, designed to do nothing but fool you? From what I can see, it wouldn’t take the resources of NASA.

Unimaginative, uninformed idjits.

#67 MikeN

I didn’t realize the Inuit were immortal.

Thanks for the intelligent and useful contribution.

Some peoples have an oral tradition and memory that lasts longer than five to seven minutes.

You’d best think about that real quick now – before you forget it and it’s gone forever.

Back when Greenland was green, not covered with ice, before environmentalists began clamoring for the ice age to continue…everything was warm and cozy.

http://tinyurl.com/lgm6b5

This site seems to have figured that out already.

the northern hemisphere ice extent in June is at its average level for the last 30 years, and during the last 30 years, there has been no decrease in ice, with the Southern Hemisphere showing an increase equal to the decrease in the Northern Hemisphere.

I would be the first to agree with you except for one small detail about the satellite images in the article. It clearly says in the caption that they are images, from a satellite, not a representation of the ice melting. That implies two images (plural) and not one.

That means one was doctored for effect.

Idjit