» Caption This Photo Dvorak Uncensored: General interest observations and true web-log.

# 1 Dave said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:11 am

“Damn, that is one hot piece of ass! Can I get an amen, brother?”

# 2 Angel H. Wong said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:14 am

The Republican’s excuse to impeach the President.

# 3 Techzen said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:14 am

Morpheus: Were you listening to me, Obama? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?

# 4 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:17 am

Michelle gets a new $6000.00 Alligator skin handbag.

# 5 Mac Guy said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

Daaaaaaaamn!

# 6 Rick's Cafe said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

What a high class operation…had hoped for something better from the leader of the strongest nation in the world.

# 7 McCullough said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:20 am

#4. LOL Funny!!!!!

# 8 Rick's Cafe said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:21 am

Oh yeah – she’s reportedly under-age too.
Maybe Obama and Letterman should get together for some “home movies”.

# 9 Neo-Postdarwinst Ben said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:22 am

He is just trying to be sensitive to the French PM who is standing next to him….

# 10 Greg Allen said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:24 am

Nothing sets off the racists more than a black man looking at a white woman.

# 11 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:26 am

#8 – I’ll bet Letterman, et al will NOT use this as fodder like advocating statutory rape as he did with Palin’s daughter… Any takers?

BTW- Yes, she is a minor…

# 12 dodgema said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:26 am

Oh, grow up, guys.

# 13 addicted2tv said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:26 am

Nice 16 year old ass.

# 14 d said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:27 am

Hey, if that walked in front of me, I’d look too!

# 15 Mikey Twit said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:28 am

“What? I’m married, not dead!”

# 16 b said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:28 am

after seeing the video version on ABC news this morning, it looks more like Obama is looking down at the step as he looks back and offers his hand to the woman in the flower skirt to help her down. Berlusconi looks very obvious and actually moves around Obama to get a better look.

# 17 Mr Anderson said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:30 am

White is right

# 18 Mr Anderson said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:30 am

[duplicate post]

# 19 m said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:31 am

I’m no Obama fan, but would you rather have a president that didn’t look at that ass.

# 20 Uh Huh said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:32 am

#16. Uh-huh

# 21 dodgema said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:33 am

Right on, MikeyTwit. That’s exactly what my husband would have said.

b, thank you for confirming what I suspected.

# 22 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:34 am

Global warming.

# 23 Rick's Cafe said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:35 am

There are more examples…different females.
hotair.com/archives/2009/07/09/caption-contest-first-ogler/

…doesn’t the man know what the secret service are for?

# 24 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:39 am

Re#4, Patrick… it was a $1000 handbag.

# 25 gmknobl said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:40 am

A – nice butt
B – watch the vid, if he’s looking it’s incidental to helping his wife down the stairs
C – Smarmy Sarkozy is probably checking her out for real, as opposed to the corrupt imagination of some neocon, yellow journalists.
D – What desperate faux news people we have these days, not that I expected anything more from the over-coverage of Michael Jackson to who actually owns their companies. If this is what we can expect from them, they aren’t worth anything.
E – Kill your tv

# 26 Mojo Yugen said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:43 am

“Can I pardon myself for statutory rape?”

# 27 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:44 am

# 23 JimR said, “Re#4, Patrick… it was a $1000 handbag.”

No, the manufacturer positively ID’ed it and then WH came down hard on them. They caved under the pressure…

# 28 Greg Allen said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:46 am

Uh-Huh,

You can’t know if Obama was staring or moving is head. You can’t even see where is eyes are pointed, let alone how long he was looking and at what.

A photo snapped like this is meaningless. Only a fool would draw a conclusion from it.

# 29 PapaSmurph said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:47 am

My, Chelsea sure has grown up fast! Hey, Hillary, oh yeah, you weren’t invited on this trip. Never mind, I’ll just hit it.

# 30 Named said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:51 am

8, 11,

She’s 17. And from Brazil.

# 31 ridin the short bus said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:54 am

#28 get a Life… its a “caption this photo”…

Damn,,how to I order one of those?
Whats her Part Number!!!
Does that come with an Air Bus?…
Now I know how Airbus Out Sells Boeing!!!

[Thank You - ed.]

# 32 Uncle Don said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:55 am

Ooooo la la!

# 33 awake said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:01 am

That photo is so far out of context that people should be ashamed to use it the way that they are.
Watch the video.
Obama steps down from the platform, notices that the girl in question has to take a huge step up and turns around and “as a gentleman” helps the other girl that was next to him take the step down.

# 34 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:02 am

Patrick… bullshit. The manufacturer admitted they were wrong. NY Daily news

# 35 LotsaLuck said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:02 am

Obama’s very own stimulus package…

# 36 Sean said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:02 am

Turns out she’s like 15. A participant in the Junior G8. I would bet it was just a coincidence, but attributing bad motives is more exciting.

# 37 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:05 am

# 33 JimR said, “The manufacturer admitted they were wrong.”

Yes, like I said. Read my post again, slooooowly.

# 38 Named said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:05 am

35,

17. From Brazil.

# 39 MikeN said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:07 am

Leno has a video like this of Ted Kennedy staring. Only the target being ogled was John Kerry.

Then again, wasn’t Obama’s brother accused of statutory rape?

# 40 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:09 am

# 34 LotsaLuck said, “Obama’s very own stimulus package…”

So true. Gotta cut Obama some slack. If I were married to someone that looked like this.
I’d be looking too…

# 41 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:11 am

Obama has a sense of humor and this is not an offensive photo. Geez, I respect the man, but some of you are way too sensitive. If he couldn’t take a “nudge, nudge, wink, wink” comment on such a benign, very natural situation… accurate or not…. he wouldn’t be worth his salt.

# 42 Named said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:15 am

39, Paddy-o

Are you saying this is more your liking?

# 43 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:15 am

Patrick, you said the White House caved under pressure. Reading slowly makes no difference to your posting false information.

# 44 rpk said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:15 am

It also called faked as seen on media matters site

# 45 GF said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:18 am

Watch my magic mojo baby, your ass is going to be on the front page of every major newspaper in the world.

# 46 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:20 am

# 42 JimR said, “Patrick, you said the White House caved under pressure.”

Really? Below is what I said. Are you blind or stupid?

“and then WH came down hard on them. They caved under the pressure”

# 47 pedro said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:25 am

#5 Make that “Dayum!”

#8 Don’t forget to add Morgan Freeman to the mix

#24 What a lame apologist, man. He WAS chasing the tail. Nothing wrong there, is it?

#32 I think you’re still asleep.

#34 for the win!

# 48 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:27 am

Patrick, If you had used “when” instead of “then” and defined which “they” you were referring to… in other words used better english, then your statement would have been clear. No wonder you get into a lot of arguments.

# 49 Mr. Fusion said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:28 am

#10, Greg,

Well, seeing one run and win the Presidency might beat that.

# 50 Olo Baggins of Bywater said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:31 am

“Too skinny for me.”

Here’s the video.

# 51 Olo Baggins of Bywater said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:32 am

#47….being vague means never having to admit error.

# 52 Brian said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:32 am

“A little small for booty but still nice!”

# 53 Patrick said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:34 am

# 24 gmknobl said, “B – watch the vid, if he’s looking it’s incidental to helping his wife down the stairs”

His wife wasn’t there…

# 54 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:48 am

OT, Re: #50, Olo…
“being vague means never having to admit error.”

that’s a great translation for…

“love means never having to say you’re sorry”

# 55 chuck said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:06 am

Obama got jungle fever.

or

Oh no you di ‘ nt!

# 56 Mark Derail said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:40 am

“I think I see a FLY that I should swat…”

# 57 Mark Derail said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:41 am

#55 FTW !!!!!

# 58 Stars & Bars said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:41 am

In the November 1976 issue of Playboy magazine Jimmy Carter stated, “I’ve looked on a lot of women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.”

What is it with Democratic CEO’s i.e. Presidents?

# 59 Stars & Bars said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:51 am

This video clears up the matter.

http://abcnews.go.com/video/playerIndex?id=8049121

http://huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/09/what-are-they-staring-at_n_228963.html

Sarkozy is the horny bastard.

# 60 Mac Guy said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:03 am

pedro – I was thinking more along the lines of this.

# 61 Phydeau said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:08 am

#57 What is it with Democratic CEO’s i.e. Presidents?

They openly admit that sexuality is part of their human nature, as opposed to the Republicans who try to pretend that it isn’t, to satisfy the sexually stunted puritan right-wing wackos in the Republican party.

Glad I could clear that up for you.

# 62 Phydeau said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:14 am

Not that all the right-wing wackos in the Republican party are sexually stunted. Just a lot of them.

# 63 MikeN said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:20 am

#60, so all the people denying in this thread, are Republicans?

# 64 John Paradox said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:23 am

What surprised me was that Greta Van Sustern (Fox) had an absolute tizzy over how the photo was misleading (visit Media Matters:
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907100001

J/P=?

# 65 GuyWhoKnowsEnglish said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:24 am

#47 JimR

You are dumber than a bag of hammers. The White House came down on them. So of course the antecedent of they was the “them” just mentioned. When you come down on someone, the person on which you’ve come down is the one that caves, because you are coming down on them.

# 66 Rick's Cafe said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:45 am

#64
…and being a business smart enough to sell women $6,000 hand bags, they are also smart enough to NOT get in a pissing match with the WH.

and just a reminder (#22), this isn’t the only picture of our President checking out what apparently stimulates his package.

# 67 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:48 am

Re: GuyWhoThinksHeKnowsEnglish but is too cowardly to use a standard alias… Where’s the news story where it states that White House came down on the Italian handbag manufacturer and forced them rescind their claim? Where’s your proof? I supported my claim, like other posters here who don’t try to post outdated, unsubstantiated or vague comments.

# 68 JimR said, on July 10th, 2009 at 11:56 am

#65, a smart manufacturer would stick to their story if it were true, and they would sell a lot more of those ridiculously overpriced bags. Look how the shoe manufactures cashed in on the Bush fiasco.

They backed off because they were full of shit.

# 69 Troublemaker said, on July 10th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

6 Rick’s Cafe said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

What a high class operation…had hoped for something better from the leader of the strongest nation in the world.

Obama is the President of China?

# 70 Phydeau said, on July 10th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

#62 so all the people denying in this thread, are Republicans?

??? Don’t know what you’re talking about. If you watch the video, it’s clear that he wasn’t ogling that woman.

# 71 The Ox said, on July 10th, 2009 at 12:40 pm

There’s a stimulus package I could get behind…

# 72 Cow-Patty said, on July 10th, 2009 at 1:11 pm

#42, Jim,

I always type slowly because it is well known that Patrick reads very slowly. And selectively.

# 73 pedro said, on July 10th, 2009 at 1:43 pm

#60 We should ask an Ed. to embed that pic.

#61 Hmmm, if I didn’t read the name, I’d have thought it was someone else, what with all that “wingnuts” banter. That’s all you people think about. I wonder why.

# 74 Alfred1 said, on July 10th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

The best caption was on Drudge:

“Mr. President!”

# 75 RSweeney said, on July 10th, 2009 at 3:18 pm

They don’t make 16 year old’s like they used to.

# 76 Cap'nKangaroo said, on July 10th, 2009 at 4:09 pm

my caption for photo after watching video

“One picture can lead to a thousand lies.”

Did the Prez check her out? Maybe, maybe not. If he did it was a great example of “glance and move on” as opposed to Sarkozy’s and his obvious ogling.

# 77 Buzz said, on July 10th, 2009 at 4:10 pm

All security-minded men have a sworn duty to keep track of any ass in the immediate area. It is written.

# 78 Special Ed said, on July 10th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

Nice turd cutter!

# 79 ridin the short bus said, on July 10th, 2009 at 4:50 pm

#78 Special… thanks for ruining my day..(night where I am)… You can better than that!!!

# 80 Hugh Ripper said, on July 10th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

so this is where all the white women are at…

# 81 yo said, on July 10th, 2009 at 5:56 pm

If the exact same thing happened with Bush or Cheney, you’d be calling for impeachment, and the media wouldn’t have instantly leapt to his defense.

My personal view is that a quick ogle would be pretty much automatic with most men and nothing to be ashamed of. But the usual “Protect The One” instinct points up the fact that me media is Obama’s willing bitch.

# 82 Mr. Fusion said, on July 10th, 2009 at 7:43 pm

#81, yo,

the usual “Protect The One” instinct points up the fact that me media is Obama’s willing bitch.

Wrong. It is the usual slam the President comments from the right wing nuts that were expected. An otherwise innocent moment has been depicted as OUR President “oogling” a minor. Shit, we even had his wife slammed for her purse and she isn’t even in the picture.

# 83 Toxic Asshead said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:13 pm

Jesus people. This has nothing to do with the girl at all. Look at his legs and feet. He cheesed himself and he’s looking around to see if anyone noticed or smelled it yet.

God, get out of the gutter. This is nothing more than poopy butt.

# 84 deowll said, on July 10th, 2009 at 8:14 pm

I don’t care if he did look though in truth in the video he seemed to be being ignoring her. The other guy wasn’t actually looking at the woman either or I don’t think so. Again I don’t care. When guys stop looking at women the species is going to end.

# 85 faustus said, on July 10th, 2009 at 9:37 pm

god you got to love all the obama apologists on here and in the media… they have done everything but come out and publicly flagellant themselves and promised he will never do it again. almost as sickening as the republicans

# 86 god said, on July 10th, 2009 at 10:59 pm

I’ve figured it out. Our cute little Fusion-chan is really a random Obama Defense generator bot. With “right wing nut” required in every one.

He’s funny.

# 87 pedro said, on July 11th, 2009 at 12:02 am

#82 Please, next time save bandwidth and just write “wingnuts” as your comment. We can pretty much know (not guess) what you wanna say from there.

# 88 pedro said, on July 11th, 2009 at 12:03 am

god is onto something

# 89 Uncle Patso said, on July 11th, 2009 at 2:59 am

This is what passes for news?

Okay, get in the spirit…

To me it looks like he’s thinking “Damn! Where’d she get those SHOES?”

# 90 Mr. Fusion said, on July 11th, 2009 at 3:16 am

#85, faustus,

god you got to love all the obama apologists on here and in the media…

It appears god, in the very next post didn’t take your suggestion too well. Anyway, there isn’t one comment above yours apologizing for Obama. Defend him, yes. Apologize, no.

Of course, you seem to conveniently overlook all those who would suggest Obama is committing something indecent, the Drudge Report being just one. Instead of everyone seeing the delightful purulent interest you do, most people are normal.

# 91 god said, on July 11th, 2009 at 4:00 am

actually, Fusion-chan, most people DO think it’s normal, and the right is not slamming him for this…pointing it out is different from saying he did anything wrong or abnormal. What’s happening that’s interesting is that the willing-toadie press is falling all over themselves to make it look like he didn’t…when in fact he did.

Pedro’s suggestion is a good one….just say “wingnut” and we’ll just say “Oh Fusion-chan, there you go again” and you can say “wingnut AND linguistic pedantry” and we’ll move on to real life while you search the blog for more situations to blame Bush for and write “wingnut”.

It’ll be like the circle of nature.

# 92 pedro said, on July 11th, 2009 at 4:03 am

#90 I was apologizing for him. I said there was nothing wrong with trailing some tail. There was another one (#19) suggesting if this was not better than having a gay president. That’s another apology.

# 93 Winston said, on July 11th, 2009 at 5:22 am

“Is that dress stain resistant?”

# 94 pedro said, on July 11th, 2009 at 9:31 am

Wanna make a post as Mr. Fusion in this blog? Just send “wingnut” to the 387466 and a full inane banter will be placed here. Network & roaming surcharges may apply. Remember, “wingnut” to the 387466

# 95 Alex said, on July 11th, 2009 at 11:07 am

Watching the video, Obama was focused on helping the girl with glasses for beginning to the end. I am a man If I would have been checking the girl with red dress I would not have been able to take the hand of the first girl, do the step, and initiate a conversation in the same split second.

# 96 Ward William said, on July 11th, 2009 at 11:10 am

Sarkozy is saying to Obama “Don’t even think about it, Berlusconi had her last night”

# 97 canucklehead said, on July 11th, 2009 at 1:20 pm

I vote for #71.

btw – #10 Greg — neither of them are black nor white. They are both mixed.

# 98 Gary, the dangerous infidel said, on July 11th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

A lot of people act as if they must resent the fact that one of the most visible icons representing family values is not only a Democrat, but the one who was labeled the “most liberal” of all 100 U.S. senators during the recent campaign.

Liberals are supposed to be having orgies and eating children, not respecting their wives and cherishing their kids. This new image of a good liberal husband and father cannot be allowed to stand.

The video in #50, though, is most telling. As the young lady ascends a rather large step, the President’s gaze does not follow its purported object. It wouldn’t be damning if it did, but as it turns out, it simply did not.

A brief note to those who referred to the young lady in the photo as a minor — remember that this was Italy, where the age of consent is 14. U.S. laws are not quite so portable to other countries and cultures.

Several worthy contenders here for captions, but I’ll pick Patrick’s #4 for the win (which makes up for his oversight on the aforementioned age issue). Even though false, the premise of the photo was that Obama was staring at her ass

# 99 pedro said, on July 11th, 2009 at 4:39 pm

#95 Generally, women are the ones that cannot chew gum and walk at the same time. Care to rephrase your statement?

#98 I gotta hand it to you, you made a great effort on that apology. It’s now perfectly clear that you think today’s democrats are the old republicans. Save that brain, it needs to be studies later on.

Also, that looking tail is lasbeled as bad in your current democrat standards.

# 100 Rick's Cafe said, on July 11th, 2009 at 7:33 pm

#69
Funny!!

# 101 Mr. Fusion said, on July 12th, 2009 at 2:00 am

#91, god,

… the right is not slamming him for this…pointing it out is different from saying he did anything wrong or abnormal.

OH? Here are a few comments. Please notice I didn’t copy those just making light of the photo. Apparently several right wing sites, including FOX and Drudge, are making these same comments.

#6, Rick’s Cafe

What a high class operation…had hoped for something better from the leader of the strongest nation in the world.

#8, Rick’s Cafe

Oh yeah – she’s reportedly under-age too.
Maybe Obama and Letterman should get together for some “home movies”.

#11, Patrick,

I’ll bet Letterman, et al will NOT use this as fodder like advocating statutory rape as he did with Palin’s daughter… Any takers?

BTW- Yes, she is a minor…

#17, Mr. Anderson

White is right

#39, MikeN

Then again, wasn’t Obama’s brother accused of statutory rape?

#40, Patrick,

# 34 LotsaLuck said, “Obama’s very own stimulus package…”

So true. Gotta cut Obama some slack. If I were married to someone that looked like this.
I’d be looking too…

#58, Stars and Bars

In the November 1976 issue of Playboy magazine Jimmy Carter stated, “I’ve looked on a lot of women with lust. I’ve committed adultery in my heart many times.”

What is it with Democratic CEO’s i.e. Presidents?

(more #91)
… that the willing-toadie press is falling all over themselves to make it look like he didn’t…when in fact he did.

The media is rightfully correcting false allegations being made in several right wing outlets. The video shows the President’s actions quite clearly, so no, he didn’t.

That doesn’t make them a “willing-toadie press”. It means they are publishing the truth and not being willing accomplices in promoting something embarrassing that didn’t happen. This is as immoral to pass off as legitimate as photo-shopping a picture would be.

I always gave you more credit for fairness. Suggesting the MSM is now being a “toadie” for displaying some journalistic integrity belies that.

# 102 Mr. Fusion said, on July 12th, 2009 at 2:13 am

#92, ‘dro,

I said there was nothing wrong with trailing some tail.

Actually there is. If your mind were not so small to understand why, there would be no reason to explain it. HINT, look up the word “dignity”.

There was another one (#19) suggesting if this was not better than having a gay president. That’s another apology.

#19 made no suggestion of a gay President;

I’m no Obama fan, but would you rather have a president that didn’t look at that ass.

in no way may be construed as advocating anything other than the pedestrian viewing of women as sex objects. So, what apology?

# 103 Mr. Fusion said, on July 12th, 2009 at 2:15 am

#94, ‘dro,

Thank you for helping to defining “wingnut”.

# 104 pedro said, on July 12th, 2009 at 3:30 am

#102 said:”…in no way may be construed as advocating anything other than the pedestrian viewing of women as sex objects…”

Reading comprehension problems won’t go away, huh? The person said that, albeit not a fan of the man, he rather have a president that is interested in watching a woman’s behind than one that isn’t.

Connect the dots, conFused.

What doesn’t make sense here is your lame attempt fro an apology where you wrongly conclude that, alebit not a fan of the man, he rather have a president with no dignity (as per your word of the day) than one with it.

No wonder your mind is a spaghetti.

#103 No need to go online to know it. You only need to go to a mirror to find the definition.

# 105 Rick's Cafe said, on July 12th, 2009 at 6:25 am

Congrats to:
Patrick, Mr.Anderson, MikeN, LotsaLuck, Stars and Bars and myself. We apparently have become “the” defination of RightWing.

Don’t know whether to be honored with the title or saddened by the what some posters are using for arguments.

# 106 Mr. Fusion said, on July 12th, 2009 at 8:48 am

#104, ‘dro,

Connect the dots, conFused.

In other words, you want me to see the world through YOUR small, narrow, perverted mind. I decline your invitation to read into something that is not plain on the face.

The need to denigrate others into pigeon holes in order to make one feel better about themself is truly the mark of a small mind. You appear to be doing that in spades. A person’s ability to see others, not their race, color, sex, disability, or sexual orientation, is what separates those little minds from the great ones.

As I suggested before, look up the word “dignity”. You should, you obviously don’t know what it means.

# 107 pedro said, on July 12th, 2009 at 12:54 pm

#106 It’s not my view of the world. It’s called analysis. Something you’re utterly incapable of doing. That’s what that person’s post means. If you want to create a completely illogical explanation to keep your world intact, that’s your prerogative.

But believe me, you look silly. Last I checked, sillyness was not part of the definition of dignity.

# 108 Mr. Fusion said, on July 12th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

#107, ‘dro,

#106 It’s not my view of the world. It’s called analysis.

You do realize how you just contradicted yourself. YOUR analysis is YOUR view of the world. Words plain on their face mean exactly that. If you see some hidden meaning then it YOUR analysis that sees that meaning.

I honestly think only you and three or four other regulars are stupid enough to find a hidden message in that post.

# 109 pedro said, on July 13th, 2009 at 9:02 am

#108 said: “I honestly think only you and three or four other regulars are stupid enough to find a hidden message in that post.”

Believe me, nobody’s above you in the stupidity dept.