
The call came in at 7:06 p.m. Juveniles, seven of them, on a quiet residential street, selling an uncontrolled substance: lemonade. A neighbor had dimed them out, and a Haverford Township police officer responded in a hurry. When he arrived at the two-story brick house on Maryland Avenue, he dutifully informed Dana Kleinschmidt, mother of four of the reputed offenders, who included 5-year-old triplets, that they were violating the law. They were selling lemonade without a permit.
Kleinschmidt was nonplussed. She told the children to cease and desist, but the law was news to her – and evidently to the rest of the township’s police department.
“We all sold lemonade when we were kids,” said John F. Viola, the deputy chief of police. “We all went, like, who calls [police] on kids?” As it turns out, according to Viola, the officer’s visit was a misunderstanding that finally was left to Sgt. Joe Hagan to straighten out.
For 12 years, Hagan acknowledged, he has patrolled the streets of Haverford buying lemonade, paying the kids a buck and surreptitiously not drinking it. It never occurred to him that he was aiding and abetting law-breakers. Legality became an issue on July 10, when William Nickerson called to complain that neighborhood children were peddling the stuff. Nickerson said they were going house-to-house ringing doorbells, and he didn’t think they were being properly supervised by adults. “I’m not being Scrooge,” he said.
The responding officer – who was unavailable, whom Viola would not identify, and whose name and badge number were blacked out of the police report – invoked a township ordinance against vending without a permit. What the officer didn’t realize, Viola said, is that the law doesn’t apply to anyone younger than 16.
“The police officer would have no way of knowing this on the street,” Viola said. “He acts on information he has available.”
There is just no shortage of “stupid” in this country.












When the law is so complicated that you have no reasonable expectation of knowing what it is, everyone is a criminal.
The flip side is that when the laws are so complicated that the cops cant keep them straight, they just assume you are a criminal an expect you to bow to their authority.
Neither situation is acceptable in a free society.
That’ll teach these kids to think for themselves, be entrepreneurs, and not rely on the government.
[/sarcasm]
“You can’t fix stupid.”
Ron White
Maybe if Nickerson was concerned about the kids going to people’s houses then maybe he should have got off his ass and walked down the street and talked with the parents.
That’s what grownups do.
What a crock, That will teach Kids to trust Authority! Lucky they were not Tazed!!!! What happened to common sense? America Aint what she used to be.
What kind of idiot would call the police about a children’s lemonade stand in the first place?
This, my friends, is socialism.
They (police?) released the name of the complaining citizen for everyone to know…but not the responding officer?
Is this a subtle way of telling everyone in town – Don’t be a tattletale?
Eliminate 90% of the laws off the books and you’ll have a better society.
Eliminate 90% of society, and You will have better laws..
Sure the cop who responded was/is a DA but I have to figure those protecting his behind are DA and stupid as well. This, it seems, is how many state and federal functions work. Pathetic and we wonder why we’re in such a bad state.
Those lemonade kids are a menace to society…
What? No tasers?
“What the officer didn’t realize is that the law doesn’t apply to anyone younger than 16.
The police officer would have no way of knowing this on the street.”
A police officer who doesn’t know the law has no business enforcing it.
These kids are a threat to the sales at Whole Foods and the other grocery stores. If they want to sell, tell them to get a permit. That should reduce the number of competitors for the big players, and keep the market stable.
understand something strange.
UNDER 16 you have NO RIGHTS.
As a person with NO RIGHTS, most laws do not apply. the person incharge of you, is RESPONSIBLE..
For those groups TRYING to give children RIGHTS, I say to them, TAKE them, they are yours to raise. Once she gets 6-8 kids and trys to raise them and WORK, I will call the State on them ALSO..
Oh, SUE the neighbor and the COPS.
#13 is right BTW!
Miss-understanding, should never be mistaken as ignorance.
Circling the drain.
Wow, half a penny per glass. Their parents must work for Verizon.