Fanboy says:

Nothing to see here. Hey! Lookit THAT!

denacron says:

It really looks to me like a $449 balloon. At least that’s what this site sells them for in their ‘special products’ section.

wholesaleinflatable.com

Jägermeister says:

#26 – denacron
#27 – Fanboy

Fully agree.

denacron says:

# 29 – That reminds me of this story.

http://tinyurl.com/5zta

whaap says:

#23,
UFO does NOT mean alien, it simply means Unidentified Flying Object.

Looks like the inflate-o-saucer already mentioned several times above.

Smile you're on saucer camera says:

The very first thing I noticed, was the tone of voice of the narrators, it’s so easy to hear in their voice their bad acting skills. There was also the odd mention of “metallic object” and they way it was said as if from a rough script making sure they say that over used term “metallic object” as that’s always what people associate with UFO descriptions. They needed to have had more rehearsals for a better more believable performance, no alien Oscars here. Also notice the way it floats like a balloon in the air. Alien ships do not float and sway and stay on it’s side. Even if they were drunk illegal aliens from Mars, their beers would spill if they flew this way. No alien would let their drink spill in a high tech spacecraft. The thing acts exactly like a balloon. Good catch on the focus disparities and the reflection and shadows, the light and shadowing from the “sun” or other light source keeps changing directions, clearly showing this unidentified flying object was not natural to this background scene. It’s so easy to do this overlay stuff now at home with an editing program, they probably had their 7 year old do it for everyone’s entertainment saying “Hey let’s put this on YouTube and see what happens! Hahahaha.”

Buzz says:

Why is it that every time there’s a supposedly “credible” UFO sighting, the footage comes from the world’s crappiest camera operator?

Can’t anyone who knows how to focus at infinity AND KEEP IT THERE shoot a picture of a sky novelty? How come no steadicam operator with a fine camera ever sees a “UFO”?

It’s so farging prevalent, the bad-camerawork=”real”-UFO thingie, that people who FAKE sightings always make it look like the cameraman was Novice J. Thumbs shooting his camera five minutes out of the box, twitching like he was on crack.

Fanboy says:

Hope whoever owned the balloon got it back. Very pricey thing, at $400. Plus all that helium. Paper lanterns with candles inside set adrift in the night sky work just as well. But then, they should only be used on rainy nights.